IP Library Granted Patent US 7,210,749
Granted Patent B2
US 7,210,749 · App. 10/768,286 · Granted May 1, 2007

Vehicle braking system with proportional poppet valve pressure control strategy

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,210,749
App. No.
10/768,286
Granted
May 1, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

An electrohydraulic brake system where brake pressure is controlled by the combined action of an apply valve and a dump valve by the implementation of a method of controlling the voltage applied to the apply and dump valve. The EHB pressure control system receives a desired wheel pressure command and, with a caliper pressure feedback signal, implements an algorithm to compute one voltage command for the apply valve and another for the dump valve, corresponding to a requested flow from the hydraulics. The voltage command drives current control electronics. The electronics in turn power the solenoids of the proportional apply and dump poppet valves to control flow in or out of the brakes and modulate wheel pressure as required. Use of the algorithm to control the electromagnetic poppet valves achieves the commanded pressure at a vehicle's brakes reliably and with good control in all states of flow through the valve. The algorithm is a function of the existing pressure within the system and whether there is bulk or leakage flow through the valves.

Claims (43)

1. A device for controlling the pressure of a hydraulic system including at least one first valve, wherein said device controls said first valve in at least three modes of control including a fully closed control mode, a leakage flow control mode and bulk flow control mode, such that when said device controls said first valve in said leakage flow control mode, said first valve is retained in a closed position, said device including a data carrier for storing an algorithm implementing said modes of control.

2. The device defined in claim 1 wherein said first valve is operated in said leakage control mode when a value of a demanded flow is between a first control constant and a second control constant.

3. The device defined in claim 1 wherein said first valve is operated in said bulk flow control mode when a value of a demanded flow is greater than a first control constant.

4. The device defined in claim 1 wherein said first valve is operated in said pressure control mode when a value of a demanded flow is less than a second control constant.

5. The device defined in claim 1 further comprising a second valve, wherein said device controls said second valve in one of at least three modes of control including a fully closed control mode, a leakage flow control mode, and a bulk flow control mode.

6. The device defined in claim 5 wherein said second valve is operated in said leakage control mode when a value of a demanded flow is between a first control constant and a second control constant.

7. The device defined in claim 5 wherein said second valve is operated in said bulk flow control mode when a value of a demanded flow is greater than a first control constant.

8. The device defined in claim 5 wherein said second valve is operated in said pressure control mode when a value of a demanded flow is less than a second control constant.

9. The device defined in claim 5 wherein:

said first valve is operated in said bulk flow mode when said demanded flow is greater than a first control constant; and

said second valve is operated in said fully closed mode.

10. The device defined in claim 9 wherein:

said first valve is operated in said leakage control mode when said demanded flow is between said first control constant and a second control constant; and said second valve is operated in said fully closed mode.

11. The device defined in claim 10 wherein: said first valve and said second valve are operated in said fully closed mode when said demanded flow is less than said second control constant.

12. The device defined in claim 11 wherein:

said second valve is operated in said leakage control mode when said demanded flow is between said first control constant and said second control constant; and said first valve is operated in said fully closed mode.

13. The device defined in claim 12 wherein:

said second valve is operated in said bulk flow mode when said demanded flow is greater than said first control constant; and

said first valve is operated in said fully closed mode.

14. The device defined in claim 2 wherein said demanded flow is “Q dem ”, said first control constant is a leakage gain factor “sigma” multiplied by a hydraulic gain factor “K,”, and said second control constant is a threshold demanded flow constant “switch” at and below which a constant voltage is applied to said first valve; and

said first valve is operated in said leakage control mode when |switch|<|Q dem |<|sigma*Kh|.

15. The device defined in claim 3 wherein said demanded flow is “Q dem ”, said first control constant is a leakage gain factor “sigma” multiplied by a hydraulic gain factor “K,”; and

said first valve is operated in said bulk flow control mode when |Q dem |>|sigma*K h |.

16. The device defined in claim 4 wherein said demanded flow is “Q dem ”, and said second control constant is a threshold demanded flow constant “switch” at and below which a constant voltage is applied to said first valve; and

said first valve is operated in said leakage control mode when |Q dem |<|switch|.

17. The device defined in claim 6 wherein said demanded flow is “Q dem ”, said first control constant is a leakage gain factor “sigma” multiplied by a hydraulic gain factor “K h ”, and said second control constant is a threshold demanded flow constant “switch” at and below which a constant voltage is applied to said second valve; and

said second valve is operated in said leakage control mode when |switch|<|Q dem |<|sigma*K h |.

18. The device defined in claim 7 wherein said demanded flow is “Q dem ”, said first control constant is a leakage gain factor “sigma” multiplied by a hydraulic gain factor “K h ”; and

said second valve is operated in said bulk flow control mode when |Q dem |>|sigma*K h |.

19. The device defined in claim 8 wherein said demanded flow is “Q dem ”, and said second control constant is a threshold demanded flow constant “switch” at and below which a constant voltage is applied to said first valve; and

said second valve is operated in said leakage control mode when |Q dem |<|switch|.

20. A method for controlling the pressure of a hydraulic system comprising applying one of a voltage or current to a solenoid valve wherein:

the voltage or current applied to the solenoid valve in a first portion of a demanded flow range is constant as flow demand varies;

the voltage or current applied to the solenoid valve in a second portion of the demanded flow range varies such that a curve of voltage versus demanded flow in the second portion is generally linear and has a first slope; and

the voltage or current applied to the solenoid valve in a third portion of the demanded flow range varies such that the curve of voltage versus demanded flow in the third portion is generally linear and has a second slope.

21. The method defined in claim 20 wherein there is a step change between the first portion and the second portion.

22. The method defined in claim 20 wherein the first slope and second slope are different.

23. The device defined in claim 1 wherein said device determines a voltage to be applied to said at least one first valve to retain said first valve in said closed position when said device controls said first valve in said leakage flow control mode.

24. The device defined in claim 1 wherein said at least one first valve has a moving valve element and a valve seat, said at least one first valve being operable in an open position in which said moving valve element is generally spaced apart from said valve seat and in said closed position in which said moving valve element is generally in contact with said valve seat.

25. The device defined in claim 24 wherein said first valve is a solenoid operated poppet valve and wherein when said device controls said first valve in said leakage flow control mode, said device determines a voltage to be applied to said first valve to seat said moving valve element against said valve seat to maintain said first valve in said closed position.

26. The device defined in claim 25 wherein when said device controls said first valve in said leakage flow control mode, said moving valve element intermittently contacts said valve seat.

27. The device defined in claim 1 wherein when said device controls said first valve in said leakage flow control mode, said voltage applied to said first valve holds said moving valve element loosely against said valve seat, so as to allow leakage through said valve.

28. The device defined in claim 1 wherein when said device controls said first valve in said leakage flow control mode, said moving valve element is generally seated against said valve seat, such that said first valve is generally in said closed position.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2013
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC.; TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC; KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY; TRW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP.
Reel/Frame 031645/0697 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 21, 2012
From: TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC.; TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC; KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 029529/0534 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2005
From: KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY; TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC; TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 015991/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 30, 2004
From: ZHENG, YUHONG; MILOT, DANNY R.
To: KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 014952/0625 →