IP Library Granted Patent US 7,418,015
Granted Patent B2
US 7,418,015 · App. 10/784,565 · Granted Aug 26, 2008

System and method for control of optical transmitter

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,418,015
App. No.
10/784,565
Granted
Aug 26, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for controlling an optical transmitter. Proximate to startup of the optical transmitter, the laser bias to the optical transmitter is increased from a minimum to a setpoint according to a predefined function. After the laser bias setpoint is reached, the electrical modulation amplitude is increased from a minimum to a setpoint according to a predefined function. Proximate to shutdown of the optical transmitter, the electrical modulation amplitude is decreased from the setpoint to the minimum according to a predefined function. After the electrical modulation amplitude minimum is reached, the laser bias to the optical transmitter is decreased from a setpoint to a minimum according to a predefined function.

Claims (44)

1. A method for controlling an optical transmitter, the method comprising:

changing a laser bias to the optical transmitter from a first laser bias level to a second laser bias level in accordance with a laser bias control scheme; and

changing an electrical modulation amplitude of an optical signal associated with the optical transmitter from a first value to a second value in accordance with an electrical modulation amplitude control scheme,

wherein the laser bias control scheme and/or the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme include a ramp function; and

wherein the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme is defined such that changing the electrical modulation amplitude to the optical transmitter from a first value to a second value comprises one of: changing the electrical modulation amplitude to the optical transmitter from a minimum to a setpoint; or, changing the electrical modulation amplitude to the optical transmitter from a setpoint to a minimum.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and electrical modulation amplitude control scheme are defined such that at least a portion of the electrical modulation amplitude change is implemented at a different time than implementation of the laser bias change.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme are defined such that the electrical modulation amplitude change is implemented at substantially the same time as implementation of the laser bias change.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme are defined such that a substantial portion of the laser bias change is implemented prior to implementation of a substantial portion of the electrical modulation amplitude change.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme and laser bias control scheme are defined such that a substantial portion of the electrical modulation amplitude change is implemented prior to implementation of a substantial portion of the laser bias change.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme is defined such that at least a portion of the change to the laser bias is implemented linearly with respect to time.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme is defined such that at least a portion of the change to the laser bias is implemented non-linearly with respect to time.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme is defined such that at least a portion of the change to the electrical modulation amplitude is implemented linearly with respect to time.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme is defined such that at least a portion of the change to the electrical modulation amplitude is implemented non-linearly with respect to time.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme is defined such that changing the power to the optical transmitter from a first laser bias level to a second laser bias level comprises one of changing the power to the optical transmitter from a minimum to a setpoint; or, changing the power to the optical transmitter from a setpoint to a minimum.

11. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme are respectively defined such that the laser bias change and the electrical modulation amplitude change are implemented in response to the occurrence of a predetermined event.

12. The method as recited in claim 11 , wherein the predetermined event comprises assertion of an optical transmitter disable signal.

13. The method as recited in claim 11 , wherein the predetermined event comprises deassertion of an optical transmitter disable signal.

14. A method for controlling an optical transmitter, the method comprising:

performing the following during a first predetermined time slot:

changing a laser bias to the optical transmitter from a first laser bias level to a second laser bias level in accordance with a laser bias control scheme; and

changing an electrical modulation amplitude of an optical signal associated with the optical transmitter from a first value to a second value in accordance with an electrical modulation amplitude control scheme,

wherein the laser bias control scheme and/or the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme include a ramp function; and

performing the following during a second predetermined time slot:

changing a laser bias to the optical transmitter from a first laser bias level to a second laser bias level in accordance with a laser bias control scheme; and

changing an electrical modulation amplitude of an optical signal associated with the optical transmitter from a first value to a second value in accordance with an electrical modulation amplitude control scheme,

wherein the laser bias control scheme and/or the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme include a ramp function.

15. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the first predetermined time slot is proximate in time to startup of the optical transmitter, and wherein the second predetermined time slot is proximate in time to shutdown of the optical transmitter.

16. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and electrical modulation amplitude control scheme are respectively defined such that in the first predetermined time slot, a substantial portion of the laser bias change is implemented prior to implementation of a substantial portion of the electrical modulation amplitude change, and wherein in the second predetermined time slot, a substantial portion of the electrical modulation amplitude change is implemented prior to implementation of a substantial portion of the laser bias change.

17. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein in the first predetermined time slot, the first laser bias level comprises a minimum and the second laser bias level comprises a setpoint, and wherein in the second predetermined time slot, the first laser bias level comprises a setpoint and the second laser bias level comprises a minimum.

18. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein in the first predetermined time slot, the first value of the electrical modulation amplitude comprises a minimum and the second value of the electrical modulation amplitude comprises a setpoint, and wherein in the second predetermined time slot, the first value of the electrical modulation amplitude comprises a setpoint and the second value of the electrical modulation amplitude comprises a minimum.

19. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein, in both the first and second predetermined time slots, at least a portion of the change to the laser bias is implemented linearly with respect to time.

20. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme is defined such that in both the first and second predetermined time slots, at least a portion of the change to the electrical modulation amplitude is implemented linearly with respect to time.

21. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the laser bias control scheme is defined such that in both the first and second predetermined time slots, a substantial portion of the laser bias change is implemented linearly with respect to time.

22. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the ramp function includes a predetermined gradual change in the laser bias and/or modulation as a function of time.

23. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the ramp function includes a linear predetermined gradual change in the laser bias and/or modulation as a function of time and a non-linear predetermined gradual change in the laser bias and/or modulation as a function of time.

24. A method for controlling an optical transmitter, the method comprising:

changing a laser bias to the optical transmitter from a first laser bias level to a second laser bias level in accordance with a laser bias control scheme; and

changing an electrical modulation amplitude of an optical signal associated with the optical transmitter from a first value to a second value in accordance with an electrical modulation amplitude control scheme,

wherein the laser bias control scheme and/or the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme include a ramp function; and

wherein the ramp function is associated with a first slope of a first linear portion of the ramp function and a second slope of a second linear portion of the ramp function.

25. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and/or the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme include a second ramp function, wherein the ramp functions are associated with different slopes.

26. The method of claim 2 , wherein the laser bias control scheme and the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme are defined such that a portion of the electrical modulation amplitude change is implemented at substantially the same time as implementation of the laser bias change.

27. The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the laser bias control scheme is defined such that a portion of the change to the laser bias is implemented non-linearly with respect to time.

28. The method as recited in claim 8 , wherein the electrical modulation amplitude control scheme is defined such that a portion of the change to the electrical modulation amplitude is implemented non-linearly with respect to time.

Assignments (5)
PATENT RELEASE AND REASSIGNMENT Recorded Jul 5, 2022
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: II-VI INCORPORATED; MARLOW INDUSTRIES, INC.; EPIWORKS, INC.; LIGHTSMYTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KAILIGHT PHOTONICS, INC.; COADNA PHOTONICS, INC.; OPTIUM CORPORATION; FINISAR CORPORATION; II-VI OPTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; M CUBED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; II-VI PHOTONICS (US), INC.; II-VI DELAWARE, INC.; II-VI OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES, INC.; PHOTOP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 060574/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2022
From: II-VI INCORPORATED; II-VI DELAWARE, INC.; M CUBED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; II-VI PHOTONICS (US), INC.; PHOTOP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; COHERENT, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060562/0254 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 1, 2020
From: FINISAR CORPORATION
To: II-VI DELAWARE, INC.
Reel/Frame 052286/0001 →
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Sep 25, 2019
From: II-VI INCORPORATED; MARLOW INDUSTRIES, INC.; EPIWORKS, INC.; LIGHTSMYTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; KAILIGHT PHOTONICS, INC.; COADNA PHOTONICS, INC.; OPTIUM CORPORATION; FINISAR CORPORATION; II-VI OPTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; M CUBED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; II-VI PHOTONICS (US), INC.; II-VI DELAWARE, INC.; II-VI OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES, INC.; PHOTOP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 050484/0204 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2004
From: HOSKING, STEPHEN
To: FINISAR CORP.
Reel/Frame 015020/0585 →