IP Library Granted Patent US 7,180,699
Granted Patent B1
US 7,180,699 · App. 10/802,491 · Granted Feb 20, 2007

Method and apparatus for increasing capacity of magnetic media storage

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,180,699
App. No.
10/802,491
Granted
Feb 20, 2007
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method and apparatus for increasing the capacity of magnetic media storage is disclosed. More specifically, an improved two-sided magnetic tape is disclosed. In one implementation, in order to mitigate pack winding problems, a trade-off can be made between the back-coat roughness of a side of the magnetic tape and the mechanical imprint of that roughness in the recording surface of that side (e.g., compromise between roughness and recording density). For example, a recording density and coding scheme deemed appropriate for a relatively large recording head-to-media separation can be used for the “rougher” side of a two-sided tape, and the highest recording density achievable can be used for the “best” or smoothest side of the two-sided tape. Depending on the recording density/roughness match selected, an optimum capacity gain can be selected from a range of capacity gains with values between 1 and 2 (e.g., 1<(gain in capacity)<2). Thus, for relatively slow spooling applications, an optimum recording density/roughness match can be selected with less roughness for the tape surface(s) involved, and for relatively fast spooling applications, an optimum recording density/roughness match can be selected with more roughness for the tape surface(s) involved.

Claims (31)

1. A method for increasing the capacity of a magnetic tape, comprising the steps of:

selecting a first head-to-media spacing for a first side of a magnetic tape;

forming a first magnetic coating on said first side of said magnetic tape, wherein a distance between a first surface of said first magnetic coating and a first recording head arranged adjacent to said first surface is substantially equal to said first head-to-media spacing;

selecting a performance value for a second side of said magnetic tape;

determining a second head-to-media spacing for said second side of said magnetic tape, said second head-to-media spacing associated with said performance value; and

forming a second magnetic coating on said second side of said magnetic tape, wherein a distance between a second surface of said second magnetic coating and a second recording head arranged adjacent to said second surface is substantially equal to said second head-to-media spacing.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

selecting a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) value for said second side of said magnetic tape; and

determining a recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape, said recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape associated with said SNR value selected for said second side of said magnetic tape and said second head-to-media spacing.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the magnetic tape comprises a two-sided magnetic tape.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said first head-to-media spacing is associated with a roughness of said first surface, said second head-to-media spacing is associated with a roughness of said second surface, said roughness of said second surface is greater than said roughness of said first surface, and a recording density value associated with said first surface is larger than a recording density value associated with said second surface.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein said recording density value associated with said first surface comprises a high recording density value, and said recording density value associated with said second surface comprises a medium recording density value.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

selecting an SNR value for said second side of said magnetic tape; and

determining a recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape, said recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape associated with said SNR value selected for said second side of said magnetic tape and said second head-to-media spacing, and wherein said SNR value is derived from an equation: SNR(dB)=n W λ 2 e −kd /6.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said performance value comprises a spooling performance value.

8. A two-sided magnetic tape, comprising:

means for selecting a first head-to-media spacing for a first side of a magnetic tape;

means for forming a first magnetic coating on said first side of said magnetic tape, wherein a distance between a first surface of said first magnetic coating and a first recording head arranged adjacent to said first surface is substantially equal to said first head-to-media spacing;

means for selecting a performance value for a second side of said magnetic tape;

means for determining a second head-to-media spacing for said second side of said magnetic tape, said second head-to-media spacing associated with said performance value; and

means for forming a second magnetic coating on said second side of said magnetic tape, wherein a distance between a second surface of said second magnetic coating and a second recording head arranged adjacent to said second surface is substantially equal to said second head-to-media spacing.

9. The two-sided magnetic tape of claim 8 , further comprising:

means for selecting a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) value for said second side of said magnetic tape; and

means for determining a recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape, said recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape associated with said SNR value selected for said second side of said magnetic tape and said second head-to-media spacing.

10. The two-sided magnetic tape of claim 8 , wherein said first head-to-media spacing is associated with a roughness of said first surface, said second head-to-media spacing is associated with a roughness of said second surface, said roughness of said second surface is greater than said roughness of said first surface, and a recording density value associated with said first surface is larger than a recording density value associated with said second surface.

11. The two-sided magnetic tape of claim 10 , wherein said recording density value associated with said first surface comprises a high recording density value, and said recording density value associated with said second surface comprises a medium recording density value.

12. The two-sided magnetic tape of claim 8 , further comprising:

means for selecting an SNR value for said second side of said magnetic tape; and

means for determining a recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape, said recording density value for said second side of said magnetic tape associated with said SNR value selected for said second side of said magnetic tape and said second head-to-media spacing, and wherein said SNR value is derived from an equation: SNR(dB)=n W λ 2 e −kd /6.

13. The two-sided magnetic tape of claim 8 , wherein said performance value comprises a spooling performance value.

Assignments (3)
MERGER Recorded Feb 4, 2016
From: STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
To: SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 037692/0820 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 4, 2016
From: SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.; ORACLE USA, INC.; ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
To: ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 037694/0966 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2004
From: DEE, RICHARD H.
To: STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015114/0892 →