IP Library Granted Patent US 7,562,058
Granted Patent B2
US 7,562,058 · App. 10/826,452 · Granted Jul 14, 2009

Predictive model management using a re-entrant process

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,562,058
App. No.
10/826,452
Granted
Jul 14, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

Models are generated using a variety of tools and features of a model generation platform. For example, in connection with a project in which a user generates a predictive model based on historical data about a system being modeled, the user is provided through a graphical user interface a structured sequence of model generation activities to be followed, the sequence including dimension reduction, model generation, model process validation, and model re-generation. A user generates a predictive model based on historical data about a system being modeled. Structured project information is automatically stored that captures a state of the project at successive steps in generating the model.

Claims (32)

1. A machine-based method comprising:

in connection with a predictive model development project in which a user interacts with a computer application in a succession of steps to generate a predictive model based on historical data about a system being modeled, the user's progress in developing the model having a state at each of the successive steps,

automatically storing structured project information that captures a state of the project at each of the successive steps in generating the model; the successive steps of the project being re-entrant based on the stored structured project information so that the user can make revisions to the project without restarting the project.

2. The method of claim 1 in which the system comprises behavior of prospective customers of a vendor with respect to a product or service offered by the vendor; behavior of prospective customers belonging to a population of potential customers with respect to a product or service; or behavior of current customers with respect to a current product or service.

3. The method of claim 1 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a prospective or current customer with respect to purchase of or payment for a product or service of a vendor.

4. The method of claim 1 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to retention of a current service or product of a vendor.

5. The method of claim 1 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to risk of asserting claims, loan payment or prepayment to a vendor.

6. The method of claim 1 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to usage of a current service or product of a vendor.

7. The method of claim 1 in which the project information comprises model process validation and at least two of: project objectives, project schedules, project requirements, information about the historical data, model ensembles and outputs of the model.

8. The method of claim 1 also including enabling the user to replicate a project based on the stored structured project information.

9. The method of claim 1 also including enabling the user to refine a previous project based on the stored structured project information.

10. The method of claim 1 also including enabling the user to apply the model generated in the project based on the stored structured project information.

11. A machine-based method comprising

in connection with a project in which a user generates a predictive model based on historical data about a system being modeled, storing in a common location project information that includes a model validation process and at least two of: project objectives, project schedules, project requirements, information about the historical data, equations expressing the model, performance characteristics of the model, and outputs of the model, steps in generating the model being re-entrant based on the stored project information so that the user can make revisions to the project without restarting the project.

12. The method of claim 11 in which the system comprises behavior of customers of a vendor with respect to products offered by the vendor.

13. The method of claim 11 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a prospective or current customer with respect to purchase of a product or service of a vendor.

14. The method of claim 11 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to retention of a current service or product of a vendor.

15. The method of claim 11 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to risk of asserting claims, loan payment or prepayment to a vendor.

16. The method of claim 11 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to usage of a current service or product of a vendor.

17. The method of claim 11 in which the project information comprises model process validation and at least two of: project objectives, project schedules, project requirements, information about the historical data, model ensembles and outputs of the model.

18. The method of claim 11 in which the common location comprises a file or folder maintained by an operating system of a computer.

19. The method of claim 11 also including enabling the user to refine a previous project based on the stored structured project information.

20. A machine-based method comprising

enabling users to engage in predictive model development projects to generate predictive models based on historical data about systems being modeled, and

applying a common project tracking paradigm to manage the generation of the models by the users and to store project progress tracking information associated with the respective models in a common format, steps in each model generation project being re-entrant based on the project tracking paradigm so that the users can make revisions to the project without restarting the project.

21. The method of claim 20 in which the predictive models each predicts behavior of a prospective or current customer with respect to purchase of a product or service of a vendor.

22. The method of claim 20 in which the predictive models each predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to retention of a current service or product of a vendor.

23. The method of claim 20 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to risk of asserting claims, loan payment or prepayment to a vendor.

24. The method of claim 20 in which the predictive model predicts behavior of a current customer with respect to usage of a current service or product of a vendor.

25. The method of claim 20 in which the project information comprises model process validation and at least two of: project objectives, project schedules, project requirements, information about the historical data, model ensembles and outputs of the model.

26. The method of claim 20 also including enabling the users to replicate a project based on the stored structured project information.

27. The method of claim 20 also including enabling the users to refine a previous project based on the stored structured project information.

Assignments (12)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2024
From: AI-CORE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: LONGHORN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 066911/0261 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2023
From: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 190 LLC
To: AI-CORE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 065227/0107 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2023
From: TAMIRAS PER PTE. LTD., LLC
To: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 190 LLC
Reel/Frame 065015/0707 →
MERGER Recorded Dec 22, 2015
From: BRINDLE DATA L.L.C.
To: TAMIRAS PER PTE. LTD., LLC
Reel/Frame 037353/0815 →
CORRECTION TO THE COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 027574, FRAME 0488, CHANGING THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE TO MERGER Recorded Oct 22, 2012
From: FORTELLIGENT LLC
To: KNOWLEDGEBASE MARKETING, INC.
Reel/Frame 029170/0124 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2012
From: KNOWLEDGEBASE MARKETING, INC.
To: BRINDLE DATA L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 029169/0618 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME TO "FORTELLIGENT LLC" IN THE ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 022975 FRAME 0203. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE ENTIRE RIGHT, TITLE, AND INTEREST. Recorded Oct 22, 2012
From: HIRSHBERG, JAY C.
To: FORTELLIGENT LLC
Reel/Frame 029170/0060 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 23, 2012
From: FORTELLIGENT LLC
To: KNOWLEDGEBASE MARKETING, INC.
Reel/Frame 027574/0488 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 13, 2011
From: FORTELLIGENT, INC.
To: FORTELLIGENT LLC
Reel/Frame 026583/0709 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2009
From: HIRSHBERG, JAY C.
To: FORTELLIGENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 022975/0203 →
CORRECT COMPANY NAME FROM FORTELLIGENT TO FORTELLIGENT,INC. Recorded Mar 8, 2005
From: PINTO, STEPHEN K.; MANSFIELD, RICHARD
To: FORTELLIGENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 015858/0736 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2004
From: PINTO, STEPHEN K.; MANSFIELD, RICHARD
To: FORTELLIGENT
Reel/Frame 015089/0010 →