IP Library Granted Patent US 7,257,088
Granted Patent B2
US 7,257,088 · App. 10/843,218 · Granted Aug 14, 2007

SDMA system using MU-SIMO for the uplink and MU-MISO for the downlink

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,257,088
App. No.
10/843,218
Granted
Aug 14, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to multiple antenna wireless access points that multiplex signals by spatial division. In particular, it relates to grouping clients of the access point for spatial division multiplexing. Particular aspects of the present invention are described in the claims, specification and drawings.

Claims (54)

1. A method of serving clients in a wireless system with m antennas, the clients outnumbering the antennas, the method including:

grouping the clients into sets of m−1 or fewer clients;

determining for the sets whether members of the sets can practically be spatially resolved using the antennas;

for at least one particular set in which at least two set members cannot practically be spatially resolved,

changing the members of the particular set and

reevaluating whether resulting members of the particular set can practically be spatially resolved; and

serving the clients in the wireless system, grouped into the sets and transmitting simultaneously to the members of the particular set during a particular time allocation.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein serving the clients further includes:

utilizing time division to allocate one or more available channels among the sets of clients.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the transmitting includes using the same available channels for transmission simultaneously to the members of the particular set.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the grouping uses a signal quality metric.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar signal quality metrics.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the grouping uses a received signal strength metric.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar received signal strength metrics.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the grouping further includes counting how many clients are in the sets.

9. The method of claim 5 , wherein the grouping further includes counting how many clients are in the sets.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the grouping further includes counting how many clients are in the sets.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining includes deriving at least approximate singular value decompositions (SVDs) for the sets.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar signal quality metrics.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar received signal strength metrics.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

the grouping further includes counting how many clients are in a particular set; and

a matrix for the SVD applied to the particular set includes at least four more columns than the count of how many clients are in the particular set.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

the grouping further includes counting how many clients are in the sets;

the method further includes estimating an expected number of interference sources; and

a matrix for the SVD applied to the particular set includes at least two more columns than the count of how many clients are in the particular set plus the expected number of interference sources.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein sampling of signals received at the antennas for derivation of the SVD is at least 2× over sampling.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein sampling of signals received at the antennas for derivation of the SVD is at least 6× over sampling.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step includes deriving cross-correlations among received signals corresponding to members of the sets.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar signal quality metrics.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar received signal strength metrics.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step further includes:

comparing received signals and expected signals;

characterizing the received signals; and

evaluating variations in the characterized signals.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar signal quality metrics.

23. The method of claim 21 , wherein the grouping produces sets of the clients that have similar received signal strength metrics.

24. The method of claim 1 , wherein the changing the members and reevaluating the resulting members is repeated iteratively.

25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the changing the members and reevaluating the resulting members is repeated until the sets consist of members that can practically be spatially resolved using the antennas.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein grouping the clients includes applying a distributed coordination function (DCF).

27. The method of claim 1 , wherein grouping the clients includes applying a point coordination function (PCF).

28. A device that serves clients in a wireless system, including:

m signal feeds;

logic and resources coupled to the m signal feeds to

group the clients into sets of m−1 or fewer clients;

determine for the sets whether members of the sets can practically be spatially resolved using the signal feeds;

for at least one particular set in which at least two set members cannot practically be spatially resolved, change the members of the particular set, reevaluate whether resulting members of the particular set can practically be spatially resolved and transmit simultaneously to the members of the particular set during a particular time allocation.

29. The device of claim 28 , wherein the logic and resources to determine practicality of spatial resolution derives at least approximate singular value decompositions (SVDs) for the sets.

30. The device of claim 28 , wherein the logic and resources to determine practicality of spatial resolution derives cross-correlations among received signals corresponding to members of the sets.

31. The device of claim 28 , wherein the logic and resources to determine practicality of spatial resolution

compares received signals and expected signals;

characterizes the received signals; and

evaluates variations in the characterized signals.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2015
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 037079/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT PREVIUOSLY RECORDED ON REEL 027329 FRAME 0001 AND 0044. Recorded May 1, 2012
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 028911/0846 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2011
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 027329/0044 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SEE ATTACHED Recorded Jul 15, 2010
From: 3COM CORPORATION
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025039/0844 →
MERGER Recorded Jul 6, 2010
From: 3COM CORPORATION
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Reel/Frame 024630/0820 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2004
From: VAN ERVEN, NIELS
To: 3COM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015378/0508 →