IP Library Granted Patent US 7,460,650
Granted Patent B2
US 7,460,650 · App. 10/852,342 · Granted Dec 2, 2008

Method for designing an automated speech recognition (ASR) interface for a customer call center

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,460,650
App. No.
10/852,342
Granted
Dec 2, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of designing a customer interface for a service center, such as an automated speech recognition (ASR) self-service center. Customer activity to an existing service center is monitored, providing customer model, which includes a collection of customer tasks. These tasks are assigned to action-object pairs, which are further assigned to routing destinations. Dialog modules are designed, based on the customer model data, including disambiguation dialogs.

Claims (40)

1. A method of designing a customer interface for an automated speech recognition (ASR) call center, comprising:

collecting data for a customer model, the customer model comprising at least recorded opening statements of customers to a call center and persona data representing customer personas;

creating a task model comprising a set of action-object pairs, based on the recorded opening statements;

creating a business rules model, representing routing destinations for customer calls;

linking the customer model to the task model, such that the opening statements are assigned to action-object pairs;

linking the task model to the business rules model, such that each action-object pair is assigned to a routing destination;

creating an action-object frequency table indicative of the relative frequency of each action-object pair, based on the results of the step of linking the customer model to the task model; and

designing an interface module for each action object pair;

wherein the designing step is performed in substantially the order of the frequency table, from higher frequency action-object pairs to lower frequency action-object pairs; and wherein the designing step is based on the personal data.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the customer interface is for a how-to-use call center application, and the step of linking the task model to the business rules model comprises linking action-object pairs to the how-to-use call center destination.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of dialog modules is activated in response to a direct routing decision.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the dialog modules is activated in response to a clarification routing decision.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the dialog module is operable to transfer the customer to one of two routing destinations.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the dialog module is a disambiguation dialog module operable to present the customer with choices.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the persona data is used to determine language alternatives.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of dialog modules is activated in response to a direct routing decision.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the dialog modules is activated in response to a clarification routing decision.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the dialog module is operable to transfer the customer to one of two routing destinations.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the dialog module is a disambiguation dialog module operable to present the customer with choices.

12. A method of designing a customer interface for a self-service call center application, comprising:

recording opening statements of customers during visits to an existing service center, thereby creating a customer model representing customer tasks;

creating a task model comprising a set of action-object pairs, based on the customer model;

creating a business rules model, representing routing destinations for customer calls;

linking the customer model to the task model, such that the opening statements are assigning to action-object pairs;

linking the task model to the business rules model, such that each action-object pair is assigned to a routing destination;

creating an action-object frequency table indicative of a relative frequency of each of the action-object pairs, based on the results of the results of the linking the customer model to the task model; and

designing an interface module for each action object pair; wherein the designing step is performed in substantially the order of the frequency table, from higher frequency action-object pairs to lower frequency action-object pairs.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the customer interface is for an ASR call center.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the customer interface is for a how-to-use ASR call center, and the step of linking the task model to the business rules model comprises linking action-object pairs to the how-to-use call center destination.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the customer interface is for a web-based self-service center.

16. The method of claim 12 , further comprising the step of collecting customer persona data during customer visits to the existing service center.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the personal data is used to determine language alternatives.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein the customer model data is collected during visits to a call center.

19. The method of claim 12 , wherein the customer model data is collected during visits to a web site via the internet.

20. A method of designing a customer interface for an automated speech recognition (ASR) call center, comprising:

defining a set of action-object pairs based on opening statements of callers to a call center;

assigning each action-object pair is assigned to a routing destination;

creating an action-object frequency table indicative of the relative frequency of each action-object pair ; and

designing an interface module for each action object pair;

wherein the designing step is performed in substantially the order of the frequency table, from higher frequency action-object pairs to lower frequency action-object pairs; and wherein the designing step is based on the persona data.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2017
From: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
To: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 041504/0952 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 23, 2012
From: AT&T KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P.
To: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
Reel/Frame 027752/0703 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 10, 2006
From: SBC KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P.
To: AT&T KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P.
Reel/Frame 018079/0189 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 24, 2004
From: BUSHEY, ROBERT R.; KNOTT, BENJAMIN A.; MARTIN, JOHN M.
To: SBC KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P.
Reel/Frame 015540/0209 →
SEE RECORDING AT REEL 015540 FRAME 0209. (DOCUMENT RECORDED OVER TO CORRECT THE RECORDATION DATE FROM 05/21/2004 TO 05/24/2004. THE WRONG MAILROOM DATE WAS AFFIXED TO THE RECORDATION FORM COVER SHEET BY THE (OIPE) OFFICE OF INITIAL PATENT EXAMINATION. Recorded May 21, 2004
From: BUSHEY, ROBERT R.; KNOTT, BENJAMIN A.; MARTIN, JOHN M.
To: SBC KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P.
Reel/Frame 015393/0047 →