IP Library Granted Patent US 7,788,159
Granted Patent B1
US 7,788,159 · App. 10/883,556 · Granted Aug 31, 2010

Bid management optimization system and apparatus

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,788,159
App. No.
10/883,556
Granted
Aug 31, 2010
Kind
B1
Abstract

Bid management with a robust set of rules that ties bids to actual site-side performance. From site-side performance data, the invention creates an optimal portfolio of keywords by determining optimal mix of keywords, position, and bids to achieve greatest return for risk, comparing keywords against one another to determine allocation of budget, and automatically implementing recommendations.

Claims (46)

1. A server device comprising a software program, the software program including instructions for:

defining a set of bid rules, each bid rule defined to determine at least in part a bid for a pay for performance advertisement;

associating at least some of the bid rules with one and only one bid engine from a set of bid engines;

associating each of the bid rules with one or more keywords, wherein each of the keywords may thereby be associated with more than one of the bid rules; and

transmitting the bid rules to the bid engine, whereby the bid rules govern the placement of pay for performance advertisements provided in response to search queries.

2. The server device of claim 1 , the instructions further including instructions for:

selecting a first subset of the bid rules; and

associating a performance goal with the first subset of the bid rules.

3. The server device of claim 2 , the instructions further including instructions for:

conducting an analysis of history data related to use of the first subset of the bid rules;

selecting a second subset of the bid rules based on the analysis; and

associating the performance goal with the second subset of the bid rules.

4. The server device of claim 3 , wherein the history data includes at least one of data relating to site-side performance and data obtained from the bid engine.

5. The server device of claim 3 , wherein the selection of the second subset of the bid rules includes at least one of a mutation and a crossing.

6. The server device of claim 3 , wherein the analysis includes identifying each bid rule in the first subset of bid rules as one of an elite, a cull, and a pool.

7. The server device of claim 6 , the instructions further including instructions for providing a recommendation relating to at least one bid rule in the first subset of bid rules based at least in part on whether the at least one bid rule is identified as an elite, a cull, or a pool.

8. A method, comprising:

defining a set of bid rules, each bid rule defined to determine at least in part a bid for a pay for performance advertisement;

associating at least some of the bid rules with one and only one bid engine from a set of bid engines;

associating each of the bid rules with one or more keywords, wherein each of the keywords may thereby be associated with more than one of the bid rules;

transmitting the bid rules to the bid engine, whereby the bid rules govern the placement of pay for performance advertisements provided in response to search queries;

selecting a first subset of the bid rules;

associating a performance goal with the first subset of the bid rules;

conducting an analysis of history data related to use of the first subset of the bid rules;

selecting a second subset of the bid rules based on the analysis; and

associating the performance goal with the second subset of the bid rules.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the history data includes at least one of data relating to site-side performance and data obtained from the bid engine.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the selection of the second subset of the bid rules includes at least one of a mutation and a crossing.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the analysis includes identifying each bid rule in the first subset of bid rules as one of an elite, a cull, and a pool.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising providing a recommendation relating to at least one bid rule in the first subset of bid rules based at least in part on whether the at least one bid rule is identified as an elite, a cull, or a pool.

13. A method, comprising:

defining a set of bid rules, each bid rule defined to determine at least in part a bid for a pay for performance advertisement;

associating at least some of the bid rules with one and only one bid engine from a set of bid engines;

associating each of the bid rules with one or more keywords, wherein each of the keywords may thereby be associated with more than one of the bid rules; and

transmitting the at least some of the bid rules to the bid engine, whereby the bid rules govern the placement of pay for performance advertisements provided in response to search queries.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

selecting a first subset of the bid rules; and

associating a performance goal with the first subset of the bid rules.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

conducting an analysis of history data related to use of the first subset of the bid rules;

selecting a second subset of the bid rules based on the analysis; and

associating the performance goal with the second subset of the bid rules.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the history data includes at least one of data relating to site-side performance and data obtained from the bid engine.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the selection of the second subset of the bid rules includes at least one of a mutation and a crossing.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the analysis includes identifying each bid rule in the first subset of bid rules as one of an elite, a cull, and a pool.

19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising providing a recommendation relating to at least one bid rule in the first subset of bid rules based at least in part on whether the at least one bid rule is identified as an elite, a cull, or a pool.

Assignments (21)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 7, 2024
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: THRYV, INC.
Reel/Frame 067341/0434 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2024
From: THRYV, INC.
To: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 067310/0627 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2024
From: THRYV, INC.
To: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 067287/0759 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Recorded Mar 2, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: THRYV, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DEX MEDIA, INC.); THRYV HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DEX MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 055472/0592 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 1, 2021
From: THRYV, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 055452/0258 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2020
From: DEX MEDIA, INC.
To: THRYV, INC.
Reel/Frame 051885/0080 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2017
From: SUPERMEDIA LLC
To: DEX MEDIA, INC.
Reel/Frame 043962/0090 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 15, 2016
From: DEX MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.; SUPERMEDIA LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 040983/0707 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE SECURITY AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039304 FRAME 0666. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Aug 15, 2016
From: DEX MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.; DEX ONE SERVICE, INC.; SUPERMEDIA LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 039682/0579 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2016
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: SUPERMEDIA LLC (FORMERLY IDEARC MEDIA LLC)
Reel/Frame 039559/0376 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2016
From: DEX MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.; DEX ONE SERVICE, INC.; SUPERMEDIA LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 039304/0666 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 30, 2010
From: SUPERMEDIA LLC (FORMERLY IDEARC MEDIA LLC)
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 025414/0364 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 30, 2010
From: IDEARC MEDIA LLC
To: SUPERMEDIA LLC
Reel/Frame 024213/0246 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 30, 2010
From: IDEARC MEDIA CORP.
To: IDEARC MEDIA LLC
Reel/Frame 024213/0232 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 26, 2010
From: IDEARC MEDIA LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 023998/0520 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 19, 2006
From: IDEARC MEDIA CORP.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 018645/0936 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 15, 2006
From: VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP.
To: IDEARC MEDIA CORP.
Reel/Frame 018545/0575 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 14, 2006
From: VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP.
To: IDEARC MEDIA CORP.
Reel/Frame 018515/0030 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2006
From: INCEPTOR, INC.
To: VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP.
Reel/Frame 018132/0840 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2006
From: MASSACHUSETTS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
To: INCEPTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 017957/0884 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2004
From: SACK, MICHAEL
To: INCEPTOR INC.
Reel/Frame 015389/0386 →