IP Library Granted Patent US 7,136,507
Granted Patent B2
US 7,136,507 · App. 10/917,985 · Granted Nov 14, 2006

Video surveillance system with rule-based reasoning and multiple-hypothesis scoring

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,136,507
App. No.
10/917,985
Granted
Nov 14, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A video surveillance system uses rule-based reasoning and multiple-hypothesis scoring to detect predefined behaviors based on movement through zone patterns. Trajectory hypothesis spawning allows for trajectory splitting and/or merging and includes local pruning to managed hypothesis growth. Hypotheses are scored based on a number of criteria, illustratively including at least one non-spatial parameter. Connection probabilities computed during the hypothesis spawning process are based on a number of criteria, illustratively including object size. Object detection and probability scoring is illustratively based on object class.

Claims (15)

1. A method for use in a video surveillance system, the method comprising

generating a first hypothesis comprising a set of hypothesized trajectories of respective objects hypothesized to have been moving through an area under surveillance at a previous time,

generating a second hypothesis comprising a different set of hypothesized trajectories of respective ones of said objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said previous time,

generating a first extended hypothesis comprising a set of hypothesized trajectories of respective objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at a present time, the trajectories of said first extended hypothesis comprising 1) at least ones of the trajectories of the first hypothesis, 2) one or more of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, and 3) a particular set of connections extending at least ones of the trajectories of said first hypothesis to at least ones of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time,

generating a second extended hypothesis comprising a set of hypothesized trajectories of respective ones of said objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, the trajectories of said second extended hypothesis comprising 1) at least ones of the trajectories of the first hypothesis, 2) one or more of said objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, and 3) a particular set of connections extending at least ones of the trajectories of said first hypothesis to at least ones of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, the first and second extended hypotheses being different from one another,

generating a third extended hypothesis comprising a set of hypothesized trajectories of respective ones of said objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, the trajectories of said third extended hypothesis comprising 1) at least ones of the trajectories of the second hypothesis, 2) one or more of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, and 3) a particular set of connections extending at least ones of the trajectories of said second hypothesis to at least ones of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time,

generating a fourth extended hypothesis comprising a set of hypothesized trajectories of respective ones of said objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, the trajectories of said fourth extended hypothesis comprising 1) at least ones of the trajectories of the second hypothesis, 2) one or more of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, and 3) a particular set of connections extending at least ones of the trajectories of said second hypothesis to at least ones of the objects hypothesized to have been moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, the third and fourth extended hypotheses being different from one another,

identifying at least one of said first, second, third and fourth extended hypotheses as being more likely than others of said first, second, third and fourth extended hypotheses to represent the actual trajectories of the actual objects moving through the area under surveillance at said present time, and

utilizing said at least said one of said first, second, third and fourth extended hypotheses to determine whether at least one predefined alert condition has occurred within the area under surveillance.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said identifying includes computing a likelihood for each of said first, second, third and fourth extended hypotheses, the likelihoods for said first, second, third and fourth extended hypotheses each being a function of connection probabilities each associated with a respective trajectory of that particular hypothesis, each connection probability being a measure of the probability that an object that terminates said associated trajectory is, in fact, an object in the area under surveillance that is on that trajectory.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said at least one of said first, second, third and fourth extended hypotheses is the one having the largest computed likelihood.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said objects are people and wherein said alert condition includes a predetermined pattern of movement of one or more people relative to at least one of a) at least one other person, b) one or more fixed objects, or c) one or more predefined zones within said area under surveillance.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said predetermined pattern of movement includes at least one time criterion.

6. An electronic surveillance system adapted to carry out the method defined by claim 1 .

7. A computer readable medium on which are stored instructions that are executable by a processor to carry out the method defined by claim 1 .

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2024
From: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: AGILENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 067705/0398 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 2, 2022
From: AGILENCE, INC.
To: AXIS AB
Reel/Frame 061960/0058 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2021
From: ACCEL-KKR CREDIT PARTNERS SPV, LLC
To: AGILENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 057941/0982 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2021
From: AGILENCE, INC.
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 057928/0933 →
ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 3, 2019
From: ACCEL-KKR CREDIT PARTNERS, LP - SERIES 1
To: ACCEL-KKR CREDIT PARTNERS SPV, LLC
Reel/Frame 051161/0636 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2019
From: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
To: AGILENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 050082/0077 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 14, 2019
From: AGILENCE, INC.
To: ACCEL-KKR CREDIT PARTNERS, LP - SERIES 1
Reel/Frame 050046/0786 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTERESTS Recorded Jan 9, 2018
From: WF FUND V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, C/O/B/ AS WELLINGTON FINANCIAL LP AND WELLINGTON FINANCIAL FUND V
To: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
Reel/Frame 045028/0880 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2017
From: AGILENCE, INC.
To: WF FUND V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (C/O/B AS WELLINGTON FINANCIAL LP AND WELLINGTON FINANCIAL FUND V)
Reel/Frame 043593/0582 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2017
From: COMERICA BANK, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION
To: AGILENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 043058/0635 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 16, 2012
From: AGILENCE, INC.
To: COMERICA BANK, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 028562/0655 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 6, 2012
From: MMV CAPITAL PARTNERS INC.
To: AGILENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 028509/0348 →