IP Library Granted Patent US 7,212,923
Granted Patent B2
US 7,212,923 · App. 10/940,273 · Granted May 1, 2007

Inferred production rates of a rod pumped well from surface and pump card information

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,212,923
App. No.
10/940,273
Granted
May 1, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for inferring production of a rod pumped well. Inferred production is estimated in a well manager which not only performs pump-off control with a down-hole pump card, but also estimates liquid (oil-water) and gas production using the subsurface pump as a meter. Methods are incorporated in the well manager for identifying and quantifying several conditions: pump leakage, unanchored tubing, free gas and oil shrinkage. Quantifying such conditions in the well manger enables accurate inferring of production thereby eliminating the need for traditional well tests.

Claims (439)

1. A method for managing production of a rod pumped well by using a subsurface pump ( 44 ) as a meter comprising the steps of,

generating a down hole pump card ( 212 ) from surface load and position measurements ( 208 , 210 ) of a rod pumping unit ( 10 ),

determining a position of traveling valve (TV) opening ( 214 ) from said down hole pump card;

determining from said down hole pump card a stroke distance S n ( 232 ) traveled by said plunger from said position of TV opening to a bottom of the stroke,

determining the volume of free gas ΔV gas ( 220 ) remaining in the pump at TV opening,

determining a distance S gas ( 222 ) of the stroke distance S n that corresponds to the volume of free gas ΔV gas remaining in the pump at TV opening,

determining a distance S l ( 224 ) of the stroke distance that corresponds to the liquid stroke distance in the pump at TV opening from the equation, S l =S n −S gas ,

determining net liquid production ( 226 ) at pump pressure and temperature for said pumping cycle from the equation,

Δ

V

1

=

π

4

d

2

S

l

where

ΔV 1 is net liquid production measured in cubic dimension at the pump,

d is the diameter of the pump measured in length dimension, and

S l is measured at the pump in length dimension,

converting ΔV l ( 228 ) at pump conditions to stock tank conditions, and

producing a report of liquid production of said well ( 230 ).

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of

identifying fluid load L f (lbs) ( 214 ), gross pump stroke S g (inches) ( 214 ), and tubing stretch S t (inches) ( 204 ) in addition to said net pump stroke S n (inches) from said pump card,

determining leakage in equivalent inches of stroke ( 216 ),

S

leakage

=

stroke

(

inches

)

=

bpd

0.1166

(

d

2

)

SPM

where

S leakage =pump stroke lost by pump leakage

SPM=pumping speed, stroke per minute

bpd=volume production lost by pump leakage, barrels per day

determining adjusted gross stroke ( 218 ),

S g adj =S g −S t −S leakage ,

iteratively solving a pump intake pressure equation ( 206 ),

P

i

=

P

a

-

L

f

A

p

where,

P i =pump intake pressure

P a =pressure above the pump plunger due to tubing head pressure and hydrostatic effects of oil-gas-water in the tubing

L f =fluid load derived from pump card

A p =area of plunger

by

(a) first assuming a low-trial P i , P i start ( 300 ),

(b) calculating an oil shrinkage factor F shrinkage and the gas remaining in solution (SCF/bbl of oil) at P i-start ( 302 ),

(c) computing the distance S gas using gas laws based on P i start pressure ( 318 ),

(d) computing S l ( 316 ) from

S l =S n −S gas ,

(e) determining oil cut at pump conditions ( 320 ) from shrinkage factor F shrinkage and measured oil cut at surface conditions,

(f) determining BOPD and BWPD at P i start ( 322 ) using oil cut at pump conditions, S l and

pump

stroke

=

bpd

0.1166

(

d

2

)

(

SPM

)

(g) determining free gas equivalent stroke ( 304 ),

S free gas =S g adj −S l ,

(h) determining dissolved gas volume (SCF/day) ( 326 ) at P i start using BOPD and gas remaining in solution,

(i) determining total gas (SCF/day) ( 306 ) passing through the pump into tubing by adding free gas volume to dissolved gas volume,

(j) determining tubing Gas Liquid Ratio, GLR, ( 308 ) from

GLR

=

total

gas

BOPD

+

BWPD

,

(k) determining P a start from said GLR ( 310 ),

(l) determining P a cal ( 311 ) from said pump intake pressure equation,

P

a

cal

=

P

i

start

+

L

f

A

P

(m) determining if P a start =P a cal ( 312 ),

(n) if so, P i n =P i start ( 328 ), if not, increasing P i start ( 314 ) and repeating steps (b) through (m) with P i n

where P i n is an nth iteration until

P a cal =P a n , and

P i true is equal to P i n ,

(o) determining ΔV gas ( 220 ) from P i true , and

(p) determining said S gas ( 222 ) from ΔV gas from,

Δ

V

gas

=

π

4

d

2

S

gas

where ΔV gas is measured in cubic dimensions at pump conditions

d is the diameter of the pump measured in length dimensions

S gas is measured in length dimensions.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of calculating inferred daily liquid production rate ( 228 ) in barrels per day from the equation,

R

IP

=

8.905

Δ

V

I

T

P

+

T

d

where

R IP is inferred daily production rate in barrels per day at stock tank conditions

T P is the cumulative producing time in a day

T d is the cumulative down time in a day, if any,

and each ΔV 1 corresponds to a known instantaneous intake pressure P i .

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising the step of determining

daily free gas rate ( 200 ) in standard cubic dimension per day is determined from the equation

G

IP

free

=

50

T

p

+

T

d

(

P

i

P

s

)

(

z

s

z

i

)

(

T

s

T

i

)

Δ

V

gas

where P i , z i , T i are pressure, compressibility and temperature at pump intake conditions,

P s , z s , T s are pressure, compressibility and temperature at standard conditions, and

ΔV gas is measured on each stroke of the pump while instantaneous P i is known, in standard cubic dimensions.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of determining Traveling Valve (TV)/plunger leakage L TV rate ( 202 ) for said pumping cycle, and

determining net liquid production ( 227 ) from the equation

Δ V net =ΔV l −( L TV )( T )

where T is the cycle time of said pumping cycle.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said step of determining Traveling Valve/plunger leakage L TV for said pumping cycle is derived by finding V crit by observing an increase in pump velocity ( 406 ) from said pump card and from the equation ( 408 ),

L TV =6.99 d 2 C p V crit

where

C p is a coefficient derived from the pump card

d is the pump diameter measured in length dimension, and

V crit is the pump velocity at standing valve opening measured in velocity dimension, and

L TV is leakage rate of the TV/plunger assembly in BPD.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein,

said step of determining Traveling Valve/plunger leakage L TV for said pumping cycle is determined by the substeps of

observing the rod string slowing down ( 428 ) and determining L TV ( 412 ) from the equation

L TV =6.99 d 2 C p V crit

where

C p is a coefficient derived from the position curve

d is the pump diameter is measured in length dimension

V crit is the pump velocity at standing valve closing.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein,

said step of determining Traveling Valve/plunger leakage L TV for said pumping cycle is determined by the substeps of

observing a maximum load loss rate of the traveling valve ( 432 ), and

determining L TV ( 434 ) from the equation

L

TV

=

6.99

d

2

C

p

k

rt

(

F

t

)

max

where

L TV is the leakage rate of the TV/plunger assembly

k rt is the combined stretch constant for the rod string and unanchored tubing and

(

F

t

)

max

is the maximum rate of traveling valve load loss (lb/sec).

9. The method of claim 8 wherein standing valve leakage is determined ( 436 ) from the surface load curve, and the equation

L

SV

=

6.99

d

2

(

1

-

C

P

)

K

rt

(

F

t

)

max

where

(

F

t

)

max

is the maximum rate of traveling valve load increase

(

lb

sec

)

.

10. A method for managing a rod pumped well by using the subsurface pump ( 44 ) as a meter comprising the steps of,

generating a down hole pump card ( 212 ) from surface load and position measurements ( 208 , 210 ) of a rod pumping unit ( 10 ),

determining the gross stroke S g ( 214 ) of the plunger of the subsurface pump ( 44 ) which pumps oil, water and gas to the surface via a production tube, where gross stroke S g is the distance measured from the lowest position where the Traveling Valve TV closes to the highest position where the standing valve SV closes,

identifying a characteristic of unanchored tubing by determining a distance S t ( 204 ) between TV closure to SV opening on said pump card,

determining a distance S n ( 232 ) as the distance traveled by the pump from TV opening to the bottom of the stroke from the equation

S n −S g −S t ,

determining liquid production for said pumping cycle ( 226 ) from the equation

Δ

V

l

=

π

4

d

2

S

l

,

where

ΔV l is measured in cubic dimension

d is the diameter of the pump measured in length dimension, and

S l is measured in length dimension, and

producing a report of liquid production of said well ( 230 ).

11. A method for managing a rod pumped well by using the subsurface pump ( 44 ) as a meter comprising the steps of,

generating a down hole pump card ( 212 ) from surface load and position measurements ( 208 , 210 ) of a rod pumping unit ( 10 ),

determining the gross stroke S g ( 214 ) of the plunger of the subsurface pump ( 44 ) which pumps oil, water and gas to the surface via a production tube, where gross stroke S G is the distance measured from the position where the traveling valve TV closes to the position where the standing valve SV closes,

determining fluid load ( 214 ) from said pump card,

determining tubing stretch ( 204 ) from the equation

S

t

=

K

L

f

D

p

E

t

A

t

where

S t is tubing stretch in length dimension

K is a dimensional constant

L f is fluid load in lb

D p is the pump setting depth in length dimension

E t is the modulus of elasticity of the tubing (Psi)

A t is the cross sectional area of the tubing (area dimension),

determining a distance S n ( 232 ) as the distance traveled by the pump from TV opening to the bottom of the stroke from the equation,

S n =S g −S t ,

determining liquid production ( 226 ) for said pumping cycle from the equation

Δ

V

l

=

π

4

d

2

S

l

,

where

ΔV l is measured in cubic dimension

d is the diameter of the pump measured in length dimension,

S l is measured in length dimension, and

producing a report of liquid production of said well ( 230 ).

12. A method for managing a rod pumped well by using the subsurface pump ( 44 ) as a meter comprising the steps of,

generating a down hole pump card ( 212 ) from surface load and position measurements ( 208 , 210 ) of a rod pumping unit ( 10 ),

determining the position of traveling valve (TV) opening ( 214 ) of said pump from said down hole pump card,

determining the distance S l ( 224 ) of the stroke distance of said pump that corresponds to the liquid stroke in the pump at TV opening,

determining traveling valve (TV)/plunger leakage L TV rate ( 202 ) for said pumping cycle,

determining liquid production ( 226 ) for said pumping cycle from the equation

Δ

V

l

=

π

4

d

2

S

l

where

ΔV l is measured in cubic dimension

d is the diameter of the pump measured in length dimension,

S l is measured in length dimension,

determining net liquid production ( 227 ),

Δ V net =ΔV l −L TV ( T )

where T is the cycle time of said pumping cycle, and

producing a report of liquid production of said well ( 230 ).

13. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of inferring daily liquid production rate ( 228 ) in barrels per day from the equation,

R

IP

=

8.905

Δ

V

l

T

P

+

T

d

where R IP is inferred daily production rate in barrels per day, and

T p is the cumulative producing time in a day, T d is the cumulative down time in a day, if any.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2021
From: RAVDOS HOLDINGS INC.
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 056362/0902 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2020
From: LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, LLC; BAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS LLC FKA BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC FKA BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED; BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, LLC; QUINN PUMPS CANADA LTD.
To: RAVDOS HOLDINGS INC.
Reel/Frame 053285/0640 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 7, 2014
From: LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
To: LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 033494/0400 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2004
From: GIBBS, SAM G.; NOLEN, KENNETH B.
To: LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 015796/0165 →