IP Library Granted Patent US 7,293,761
Granted Patent B2
US 7,293,761 · App. 10/965,544 · Granted Nov 13, 2007

Diagnostic system for cranes

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,293,761
App. No.
10/965,544
Granted
Nov 13, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A hoist system for critical loads incorporates improved safety technology to monitor various possible fault conditions. For example, a command-not-operated function causes braking of the hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions including a lack of load movement when a movement command is issued by the operating system, failure of encoder feedback, or failure of a control circuit. An uncommanded motion function also causes braking of the hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions including load movement without a movement command issued by the operating system, or reverse directional movement of the load from a directional movement command input by the operating system.

Claims (70)

1. A hoisting system comprising:

a hoist for lifting a load;

brakes connected to said hoist;

an operating system for operating said hoist; and

a controller for providing single failure proof operation comprising a command-not-operated function that causes braking of said hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting essentially of: (1) a lack of load movement when a movement command is issued by said operating system, (2) failure of encoder feedback, or (3) failure of a control circuit.

2. The hoisting system of claim 1 , wherein said command-not-operated function further comprises a programmed time delay.

3. The hoisting system of claim 2 , wherein said programmed time delay compensates for a time delay caused by at least one of backlash and, hoist drive torque proof testing.

4. The hoisting system of claim 1 , wherein said controller further comprises an overspeed function that causes braking of said hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of; (1) a load movement exceeding a predetermined threshold speed in an upward direction, or (2) a load movement exceeding a predetermined threshold speed in a downward direction.

5. The hoisting system of claim 4 , wherein said controller further comprises a differential motion function that causes braking of said hoist when a direction and speed of a load movement does not match a direction and speed of a load movement command issued by said operating system.

6. The hoisting system of claim 5 , further comprising;

a high speed driveline and a low speed driveline; and

wherein said controller further comprises a drive train discontinuity function that causes braking of said hoist when a predetermined ratio difference between said high speed driveline speed and said low speed driveline speed is exceeded.

7. The hoisting system of claim 1 , wherein said controller further comprises a differential motion function that causes braking of said hoist when a direction and speed of a load movement does not match a direction and speed of a movement command issued by said operating system.

8. The hoisting system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a high speed driveline and a low speed driveline; and

wherein said controller further comprises a drive train discontinuity function that causes braking of said hoist when a predetermined ratio difference between said high speed driveline speed and said low speed driveline speed is exceeded.

9. The hoisting system of claim 1 , wherein said encoder is a quadrature encoder.

10. A hoisting system comprising:

a hoist for lifting a load;

brakes connected to said hoist;

an operating system for operating said hoist; and

a controller for providing single failure proof operation comprising:

an uncommanded motion function that causes braking of said hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of; (1) load movement without a movement command issued by said operating system, or (2) reverse directional movement of said load from a directional movement command input by said operating system.

11. The hoisting system of claim 10 , wherein said controller further comprises an overspeed function that causes braking of said hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of: (1) a load movement exceeding a predetermined threshold speed in an upward direction, or (2) a load movement exceeding a predetermined threshold speed in a downward direction.

12. The hoisting system of claim 11 , wherein said controller further comprises a differential motion function that causes braking of said hoist when a direction and speed of a load movement does not match a direction and speed of a movement command issued by said operating system.

13. The hoisting system of claim 12 , further comprising;

a high speed driveline and a low speed driveline;

wherein said controller further comprises a drive train discontinuity function that causes braking of said hoist when a predetermined ratio difference between said high speed driveline speed and said low speed driveline speed is exceeded.

14. The hoisting system of claim 13 , wherein said controller further comprises a command-not-operated function that causes braking of said hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of (1) a lack of load movement when a movement command is issued by said operating system, (2) failure of encoder feedback, or (3) failure of a control circuit.

15. The hoisting system of claim 14 , further comprising a programmed time delay before a function is triggered.

16. The hoisting system of claim 15 , wherein said programmed time delay compensates for at least one of hoist drive deceleration and, operator reverse plugging.

17. The hoisting system of claim 15 , wherein said programmed time delay compensates for at least one of hoist drive deceleration and, operator reverse plugging.

18. The hoisting system of claim 10 , wherein said uncommanded motion function further comprises a programmed time delay.

19. The hoisting system of claim 18 , wherein said programmed time delay compensates for at least one of hoist drive deceleration and, operator reverse plugging.

20. The hoisting system of claim 10 , wherein said encoder is a quadrature encoder.

21. A method of retrofitting a crane assembly with an improved controller, comprising the steps of:

providing a controller providing a single failure proof operation comprising a command-not-operated function that causes braking of a hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting off: (1) a lack of load movement when a movement command is issued by said operating system, (2) failure of encoder feedback, or (3) failure of a control circuit.

22. A method of retrofitting a crane assembly with an improved controller, comprising the steps of:

providing a controller providing a single failure proof operation comprising an uncommanded motion function that causes braking of a hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of: (1) load movement without a movement command issued by said operating system, or (2) reverse directional movement of a load from a directional movement command input by said operating system.

23. A method of providing a lift hoisting diagnostic system comprising the steps of:

operating an operating system for moving a crane;

issuing a command to move a load with said operating system;

detecting non-movement of said load with an encoder;

transmitting a signal from said encoder to a controller;

comparing said command to move with said signal from said encoder;

transmitting from said controller a command to a braking system; and

braking said crane.

24. The method of providing a lift hoisting diagnostic system of claim 23 , further comprising the step of: compensating for a time delay caused by at least one of backlash and, hoist drive torque proof testing.

25. A method for providing a hoisting diagnostic system comprising steps of:

detecting movement of a load with an encoder:

transmitting a signal from said encoder to a controller;

transmitting a signal from an operating system for commanding movement of said load to said controller;

comparing said signal from said encoder with said signal from said operating system;

transmitting from said controller a command to a braking system; and

braking said crane.

26. The method of providing a hoisting diagnostic system of claim 25 , further comprising the step of compensating for a time delay due to at least one of hoist drive deceleration and, operator reverse plugging.

27. A hoisting diagnostic apparatus comprising;

a controller for providing single failure proof operation comprising;

a command-not-operated function that causes braking of a hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of: (1) a lack of load movement when a movement command is issued by a operating system, (2) failure of encoder feedback, or (3) failure of a control circuit.

28. A hoisting diagnostic apparatus comprising;

a controller for providing single failure proof operation comprising:

an uncommanded motion function that causes braking of a hoist when an encoder detects one of a group of conditions consisting of: (1) load movement without a movement command issued by an operating system, or (2) reverse directional movement of a load from a directional movement command input by said operating system.

29. A hoisting diagnostic apparatus comprising:

a controller for operating a crane comprising:

a complex programmable logic device for receiving signals;

a processor for interfacing with said complex programmable logic device; and

wherein said complex programmable logic device is programmed with encoder counter logic.

30. The hoisting diagnostic apparatus of claim 29 , wherein said complex programmable logic device further comprises encoder signal filters.

31. The hoisting diagnostic apparatus of claim 29 , wherein said complex programmable logic device further comprises encoder edge decoders.

32. The hoisting diagnostic apparatus of claim 29 , wherein said complex programmable logic device further comprises encoder counter control logic.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 15, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC.; A.S.V., INC.; CMI TEREX CORPORATION; TEREX ADVANCE MIXER, INC.; TEREX CORPORATION; TEREX USA, LLC; TEREX-TELELECT INC.
Reel/Frame 033744/0809 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 23, 2011
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC.; AMIDA INDUSTRIES, INC.; A.S.V., INC.; CMI TEREX CORPORATION; TEREX ADVANCE MIXER, INC.; TEREX CRANES WILMINGTON, INC.; TEREX CORPORATION; TEREX USA, LLC; TEREX-TELELECT, INC.
Reel/Frame 026955/0817 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 15, 2009
From: AMERICAN CRANE & EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 023649/0374 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 19, 2009
From: TEREX CORPORATION; AMIDA INDUSTRIES, INC.; A.S.V., INC.; CMI TEREX CORPORATION; GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC.; TEREX ADVANCE MIXER, INC.; TEREX CRANES WILMINGTON, INC.; TEREX USA, LLC (FORMERLY CEDARAPIDS, INC.); TEREX-TELELECT, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 023107/0892 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2005
From: NORHEIM, ODDVAR; GRIESEMER, JEFFREY; MALEK, GLENN
To: AMERICAN CRANE & EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 016715/0453 →