IP Library Granted Patent US 7,321,881
Granted Patent B2
US 7,321,881 · App. 11/067,066 · Granted Jan 22, 2008

Methods and systems for predicting occurrence of an event

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,321,881
App. No.
11/067,066
Granted
Jan 22, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and systems for training a neural network having weighted connections for classification of data, as well as embodiments corresponding to the use of such a neural network for the classification of data, including, for example, prediction of an event (e.g., disease). The method may include inputting input training data into the neural network, processing, by the neural network, the input training data to produce an output, determining an error between the output and a desired output corresponding to the input training data, rating the performance neural network using an objective function, wherein the objective function comprises a function C substantially in accordance with an approximation of the concordance index and adapting the weighted connections of the neural network based upon results of the objective function.

Claims (198)

1. A method for predicting recurrence of cancer in a patient comprising:

estimating the probability that cancer will recur within a shorter period of time in a patient with a higher prognostic score than a patient with a lower prognostic score, wherein estimating comprises conducting pair-wise comparisons between prognostic scores for patients i and j, using a neural network trained using an objective function comprising a function C substantially in accordance with an approximation of the concordance index.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein using a neural network trained using an objective function comprises using a neural network trained using an objective function comprising a function C substantially in accordance with a derivative of the concordance index.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein using a neural network trained using an objective function comprises using a neural network trained using an objective function comprising a function C that allows for the use of censored data in the training.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the function C comprises

C

=

(

i

,

j

)

Ω

R

(

t

^

i

,

t

^

j

)

Ω

,

wherein Ω comprises pairs of patients {i, j}meeting one or more predetermined conditions.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the function C comprises

C

ω

=

(

i

,

j

)

Ω

-

(

t

^

i

-

t

^

j

)

·

R

(

t

^

i

,

t

^

j

)

D

,

wherein

D

=

(

i

,

j

)

Ω

-

(

t

^

i

-

t

^

j

)

is a normalization factor, and Ω comprises pairs of data (i, j) meeting one or more predetermined conditions.

6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the predetermined conditions comprise at least:

both patients i and j have experienced recurrence and the recurrence time t i of patient i is shorter than the recurrence time t j of patient j; and

patient i has experienced recurrence and t i is shorter than patient j's follow-up visit time t j .

7. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the predetermined conditions comprise at least:

both patients i and j have experienced recurrence and the recurrence time t i of patient i is shorter than the recurrence time t j of patient j; and

patient i has experienced recurrence and t i is shorter than patient j's follow-up visit time t j .

8. Computer readable media comprising computer instructions for allowing a computer system to perform a method for predicting recurrence of cancer in a patient, the method comprising estimating the probability that cancer will recur within a shorter period of time in a patient with a higher prognostic score than a patient with a lower prognostic score, wherein estimating comprises conducting pair-wise comparisons between prognostic scores for patients i and j, using a neural network trained using an objective function comprising a function C substantially in accordance with an approximation of the concordance index.

9. The computer readable media of claim 8 , wherein using a neural network comprises using a neural network trained using an objective function comprising a function C substantially in accordance with a derivative of the concordance index.

10. The computer readable media of claim 8 , wherein using a neural network comprises using a neural network trained using an objective function comprising a function C that allows for the use of censored data in the training.

11. The computer readable media according to claim 8 , wherein the function C comprises

C

=

(

i

,

j

)

Ω

R

(

t

^

i

,

t

^

j

)

Ω

,

wherein Ω comprises pairs of patients {i, j} meeting one or more predetermined conditions.

12. The computer readable media according to claim 8 , wherein the function C comprises

C

ω

=

(

i

,

j

)

Ω

-

(

t

^

i

-

t

^

j

)

·

R

(

t

^

i

,

t

^

j

)

D

,

wherein

D

=

(

i

,

j

)

Ω

-

(

t

^

i

-

t

^

j

)

is a normalization factor, and Ω comprises pairs of data (i, j) meeting one or more predetermined conditions.

13. The computer readable media according to claim 11 , wherein the predetermined conditions comprise at least:

both patients i and j have experienced recurrence and the recurrence time t i of patient i is shorter than the recurrence time t j of patient j; and

patient i has experienced recurrence and t i is shorter than patient j's follow-up visit time t j .

14. The computer readable media according to claim 12 , wherein the predetermined conditions comprise at least:

both patients i and j have experienced recurrence and the recurrence time t i of patient i is shorter than the recurrence time t j of patient j; and

patient i has experienced recurrence and t i is shorter than patient j's follow-up visit time t j .

Assignments (9)
THIS IS TO CORRECT ERRORS IN A COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED (REEL/FRAME 027502/0828): CORRECTION OF THE ASSIGNOR'S NAME TO AUREON (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC.; CORRECTION OF THE ASSIGNEE'S NAME TO AUREON, INC. Recorded May 22, 2012
From: AUREON (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
To: AUREON, INC.
Reel/Frame 028252/0442 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2012
From: AUREON, INC.
To: CHAMPALIMAUD FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 028244/0077 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2012
From: AUREON BIOSCIENCES, INC.
To: DAVID SANS
Reel/Frame 027502/0828 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 25, 2010
From: AUREON BIOSCIENCES, INC.
To: ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI GMBH & CO. KG; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI, L.P.; ATLAS VENTURE ENTREPRENEURS' FUND VI, L.P.; PFIZER INC.; MINTZ LEVIN INVESTMENTS LLC; SPROUT CAPITAL IX, L.P.; DLJ CAPITAL CORP.; SPROUT ENTREPRENEURS FUND, L.P.; SPROUT IX PLAN INVESTORS, L.P.; CANTABRIA DE ACTIVOS, S.L.; CORPORACION MASAVEU, S.A.; INICIATIVAS DIGITALES; IPETEX S.A.; INVERSIONES VECU 2006, S.L.; LEALTAD DESARROLLO, S.C.R., S.A.; BASSETTI, MARCO; C+PA-CIMENTO E PRODUTOS ASSOCIADOS, S.A.
Reel/Frame 025178/0899 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 9, 2010
From: AUREON BIOSCIENCES, INC.
To: ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI, L.P.; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI GMBH & CO. KG; ATLAS VENTURE ENTREPRENEURS' FUND VI, L.P.; SPROUT ENTREPRENEURS FUND, L.P.; SPROUT CAPITAL IX, L.P.; DLJ CAPITAL CORP.; SPROUT IX PLAN INVESTORS, L.P.; PFIZER INC; MINTZ LEVIN INVESTMENTS LLC; INICIATIVAS DIGITALES; INVERSIONES VECU 2006, S.L.; LEALTAD DESARROLLO, S.C.R., S.A.; IPETEX S.A.; CANTABRIA DE ACTIVOS, S.L.; CORPORACION MASAVEU, S.A.; PEREZ DE ARMINAN, ALFREDO; FERNANDEZ DE VILLAVICENCIO, GABRIEL STAMOGLOU; FERNANDEZ DE VILLAVICENCIO, ALEJANDRO STAMOGLOU
Reel/Frame 024946/0493 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 12, 2010
From: AUREON LABORATORIES, INC.
To: ATLAS VENTURE ENTREPRENEURS' FUND VI, L.P.; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI GMBH & CO. KG; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI, L.P.; SPROUT CAPITAL IX, L.P.; DLJ CAPITAL CORP.; SPROUT IX PLAN INVESTORS, L.P.; SPROUT ENTREPRENEURS' FUND, L.P.; PFIZER INC.; CANTABRIA DE ACTIVOS, S.L.; CORPORACION MASAVEU, S.A.; LEALTAD DESARROLLO, S.C.R., S.A.; INICIATIVAS DIGITALES; INVERSIONES VECU 2006, S.L.; MARCO BASSETTI; ESTRELA - SGPS, S.A.; MINTZ LEVIN INVESTMENTS LLC
Reel/Frame 023768/0486 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 3, 2006
From: AUREON BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION
To: AUREON LABORATORIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 017865/0717 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 17, 2005
From: MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES, LP
To: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 016357/0374 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 23, 2005
From: SAIDI, OLIVIER; VERBEL, DAVID A.; YAN, LIAN
To: AUREON BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 016594/0354 →