IP Library Granted Patent US 8,577,688
Granted Patent B2
US 8,577,688 · App. 11/152,972 · Granted Nov 5, 2013

Alliance business relationship management method and tool

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,577,688
App. No.
11/152,972
Granted
Nov 5, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An alliance business relationship is managed by receiving a request for a relationship from a firm. An alliance taxonomy stored in a database is used to determine whether the request is an alliance. An opportunity in the request is identified and quantified. The alliance is formed, executed, and subsequently terminated. Thereafter, the alliance is again evaluated against the criteria in the taxonomy to determine whether another relationship type applies.

Claims (52)

1. A system comprising a network I/O, a CPU, and one or more databases for implementing a method of managing an alliance business relationship, said method comprising the steps of:

receiving a request for a third party relationship;

determining whether said relationship is an alliance using criteria in an alliance taxonomy stored in one of said databases;

identifying and quantifying an opportunity in said relationship request including evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of said opportunity;

preparing and evaluating a business case for said opportunity;

forming said alliance including negotiating an alliance relationship contract;

executing said alliance;

terminating said alliance; and

evaluating said alliance against criteria in said alliance taxonomy.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein said third party is a business providing services.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein said services comprise information technology services, human resources services, business transformation outsourcing services, or customer relationship management services.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein said taxonomy is a classification system defining relationship types based on characteristics, attributes, and obligations.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein said taxonomy defines the manner in which said relationship types align with each other.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein said relationship types comprise supplier, influencer, channel, alliance, and equity relationship types.

7. The system of claim 4 , wherein said evaluating includes determining whether said third party relationship is a candidate for another of said relationship types.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein said identifying and quantifying includes conducting preliminary discussions with said third party.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein said identifying and quantifying includes prototyping potential solution offerings proposed for said alliance.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein said forming includes developing a business plan with said third party to implement said alliance relationship contract.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein said executing step further comprises executing in accordance with said alliance relationship contract and managing through said business plan.

12. A system comprising a network I/O, a CPU, and one or more databases, for implementing a method of managing a strategic business relationship, said method comprising the steps of:

entering a request for a relationship;

determining the relationship type using a criteria in a relationship taxonomy stored in one of said databases;

identifying and quantifying an opportunity in said relationship request including evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of said opportunity;

preparing and evaluating a business case for said opportunity;

forming said relationship type including negotiating a relationship contract;

executing said relationship type;

terminating said relationship type; and

evaluating said relationship type against criteria in said taxonomy.

13. An alliance managing system, comprising:

a database having a request for a third party relationship;

said database including software code for determining whether said relationship is an alliance using criteria in an alliance taxonomy stored in said database;

software capability included in said database for identifying and quantifying an opportunity in said relationship request including evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of said opportunity;

software capability included in said database for preparing and evaluating a business case for said opportunity;

software capability included in said database for forming said alliance including negotiating an alliance relationship contract, and for tracking said forming and negotiating in said database;

software capability included in said database for executing said alliance;

software capability included in said database for terminating said alliance; and

software capability included in said database for evaluating within said database, said alliance against criteria in said alliance taxonomy.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein said third party is a business providing services.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein said taxonomy is a classification system defining relationship types based on characteristics, attributes, and obligations.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein said relationship types comprise supplier, influencer, channel, alliance, and equity relationship types.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein said software capability included in said database for identifying and quantifying includes software capability included in said database for prototyping potential solution offerings proposed for said alliance.

18. A computer program product for instructing a processor to manage an alliance business relationship, said computer program product comprising:

a computer readable medium;

first program instruction means for receiving a request for a third party relationship;

second program instruction means for determining whether said relationship is an alliance using criteria in an alliance taxonomy;

third program instruction means for identifying and quantifying an opportunity in said relationship request including evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of said opportunity;

fourth program instruction means for preparing and evaluating a business case for said opportunity;

fifth program instruction means for recording the forming of said alliance including negotiating an alliance relationship contract;

sixth program instruction means for tracking the executing of said alliance;

seventh program instruction means for tracking the terminating of said alliance; and

eighth program instruction means for evaluating said alliance against criteria in said alliance taxonomy; and wherein

all said program instruction means are recorded on said medium.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: KYNDRYL, INC.
Reel/Frame 057885/0644 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF CONVEYING PARTY(IES): MICHAEL A. LIMANNI, JR. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 016432 FRAME 0539. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NAME OF CONVEYING PARTY(IES): MICHALE A. LIMANNI, JR.. Recorded Jul 19, 2013
From: CASWELL, NATHAN SAUDERS; COMER, GINA M.; LIMANNI, MICHAEL A., JR.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030834/0041 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2005
From: CASWELL, NATHAN SAUDERS; COMER, GINA M.; LIMANNI, JR., MICHALE A.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 016432/0539 →