IP Library Granted Patent US 7,873,505
Granted Patent B2
US 7,873,505 · App. 11/168,662 · Granted Jan 18, 2011

Method and apparatus for predicting scheduled system downtime

Assignee: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,873,505
App. No.
11/168,662
Granted
Jan 18, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention includes a method for predicting a scheduled downtime associated with a system. In one embodiment, a method includes determining a system model associated with the system according to a system type of the system, determining at least one scheduled system downtime event type associated with the system using the system model, selecting at least one scheduled system downtime event model according to the at least one scheduled system downtime event type, and predicting the scheduled system downtime using the at least one scheduled system downtime event model.

Claims (48)

1. An apparatus for predicting scheduled downtime for a system, the apparatus comprising:

a processor;

a scheduled system downtime analyzer configured for determining a plurality of scheduled system downtime estimates comprising first and second scheduled system downtime estimates for the system;

wherein the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates are determined using at least one scheduled system downtime event model and downtime metrics;

wherein the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates each comprise at least one of a hardware downtime estimate determined using a hardware model, a firmware downtime estimate determined using a firmware model, and a software downtime estimate determined using a software model;

wherein at least one of the scheduled system downtime event models used for determining at least one of the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates is configured for determining a scheduled system downtime estimate using pro-rating based at least in part on a percentage of system capacity expected to be affected by an associated event for which the scheduled system downtime estimate is determined; and

a system downtime aggregator configured for aggregating the scheduled system downtime estimates to produce thereby scheduled system downtime results for the system, and for updating at least one scheduled system downtime event model using at least a portion of the scheduled system downtime results.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the downtime metrics used for determining the scheduled system downtime estimates comprise at least one of actual downtime metrics and estimated downtime metrics.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the downtime metrics comprise estimated downtime metrics.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the system downtime aggregator is configured for updating at least a portion of the estimated downtime metrics using at least a portion of the scheduled system downtime results.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the scheduled system downtime estimates is determined using a system model.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the system model comprises at least one of a hardware component type associated with a system type, a firmware component type associated with a system type, and a software component type associated with a system type.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the scheduled system downtime analyzer is configured for identifying a system model associated with the system, determining at least one scheduled system downtime event type associated with the system model, and selecting at least one of the scheduled system downtime event models using the at least one scheduled system downtime event type.

8. A method for predicting scheduled downtime for a system, the method comprising:

using a processor for:

determining a plurality of scheduled system downtime estimates comprising first and second scheduled system downtime estimates for the system;

wherein the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates are determined using at least one scheduled system downtime event model and downtime metrics;

wherein the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates each comprise at least one of a hardware downtime estimate determined using a hardware model, a firmware downtime estimate determined using a firmware model, and a software downtime estimate determined using a software model;

wherein at least one of the scheduled system downtime event models used for determining at least one of the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates is configured for determining a scheduled system downtime estimate using pro-rating based at least in part on a percentage of system capacity expected to be affected by an associated event for which the scheduled system downtime estimate is determined;

aggregating the scheduled system downtime estimates for the system to produce thereby scheduled system downtime results for the system; and

updating at least one scheduled system downtime event model using at least a portion of the scheduled system downtime results.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the downtime metrics used for determining the scheduled system downtime estimates comprise at least one of actual downtime metrics and estimated downtime metrics.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the downtime metrics comprise estimated downtime metrics.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

updating at least a portion of the estimated downtime metrics using at least a portion of the scheduled system downtime results.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein at least one of the scheduled system downtime estimates is determined using a system model.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the system model comprises at least one of a hardware component type associated with a system type, a firmware component type associated with a system type, and a software component type associated with a system type.

14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

identifying a system model associated with the system;

determining at least one scheduled system downtime event type associated with the system model; and

selecting at least one of the scheduled system downtime event models using the at least one scheduled system downtime event type.

15. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to perform a method for predicting scheduled downtime for a system, the method comprising:

determining a plurality of scheduled system downtime estimates comprising first and second scheduled system downtime estimates for the system;

wherein the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates are determined using at least one scheduled system downtime event model and downtime metrics;

wherein the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates each comprise at least one of a hardware downtime estimate determined using a hardware model, a firmware downtime estimate determined using a firmware model, and a software downtime estimate determined using a software model;

wherein at least one of the scheduled system downtime event models used for determining at least one of the first and second scheduled system downtime estimates is configured for determining a scheduled system downtime estimate using pro-rating based at least in part on a percentage of system capacity expected to be affected by an associated event for which the scheduled system downtime estimate is determined;

aggregating the scheduled system downtime estimates for the system to produce thereby scheduled system downtime results for the system; and

updating at least one scheduled system downtime event model using at least a portion of the scheduled system downtime results.

16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the downtime metrics used for determining the scheduled system downtime estimates comprise at least one of actual downtime metrics and estimated downtime metrics.

17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the downtime metrics comprise estimated downtime metrics.

18. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , the method further comprising:

updating at least a portion of the estimated downtime metrics using at least a portion of the scheduled system downtime results.

19. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein at least one of the scheduled system downtime estimates is determined using a system model.

20. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein the system model comprises at least one of a hardware component type associated with a system type, a firmware component type associated with a system type, and a software component type associated with a system type.

21. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15 , the method further comprising:

identifying a system model associated with the system;

determining at least one scheduled system downtime event type associated with the system model; and

selecting at least one of the scheduled system downtime event models using the at least one scheduled system downtime event type.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OT WSOU TERRIER HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056990/0081 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2020
From: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 052372/0577 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 20, 2019
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 051061/0753 →
MERGER Recorded Dec 1, 2010
From: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 025404/0423 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2005
From: FRANKLIN, PAUL HAMPTON
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 016663/0363 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2005
From: BAUER, ERIC JONATHAN; KIMBER, DOUGLAS A.; ZHANG, XUEMEI
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 016742/0313 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070010983A1 · Jan 11, 2007