IP Library Granted Patent US 7,904,144
Granted Patent B2
US 7,904,144 · App. 11/195,001 · Granted Mar 8, 2011

Method for assessing brain function and portable automatic brain function assessment apparatus

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,904,144
App. No.
11/195,001
Granted
Mar 8, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for performing rapid brain assessment may provide emergency triage to head trauma patients by analyzing a combination of spontaneous and evoked brain potentials. The spontaneous and evoked potentials are analyzed, and the results classified, to present a real-time assessment of a patient's brain, diagnosing any potential abnormalities therein.

Claims (78)

1. A method of determining a neurological state of a subject comprising the steps of:

acquiring spontaneous and evoked signals through an electrode set;

de-noising the acquired signals;

extracting features from the de-noised signals using wavelet packet analysis; and

classifying the extracted features.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the electrode set comprises less than 19 electrodes.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the spontaneous signals comprise:

electroencephalographic (EEG) signals.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the evoked signals comprise:

auditory evoked potentials (AEP).

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the auditory evoked potentials comprise at least one of:

auditory brainstem response (ABR) potentials, auditory mid-latency response (AMLR) potentials, or auditory late response (ALR) potentials, including P100 responses and P300 responses.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of de-noising the signals comprises:

de-noising the acquired signals using signal transformation and non-linear processing.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the step of de-noising the signals further comprises:

filtering the signals using a dual-tree complex wavelet transform of the acquired signals.

8. The method of according to claim 1 , wherein the step of de-noising the signals comprises:

removing artifacts from the acquired signal by identifying artifact sections in the acquired signals and subtracting the identified artifact sections.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of extracting features comprises:

performing spectral analysis and statistical procedures on the de-noised signals, and extracting features.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein applying spectral analysis comprises:

applying a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to the de-noised signals, dividing the signals into frequency bands.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein

the extracted features include absolute and relative power, symmetry and coherence.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of extracting features further comprises:

applying Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis on the de-noised signals to extract features.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of classifying comprises:

applying discriminant analysis to the extracted features to classify the extracted features into one or more diagnostic categories.

14. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

determining a neurological state of the subject based on the classification.

15. The method according to claim 14 , wherein the step of determining further comprises:

determining if the neurological state is normal or abnormal.

16. The method according to claim 15 , further comprising:

determining if an abnormal neurological state is psychiatric or “functional” in nature, organic in nature, or an emergency or “Alert” condition.

17. The method according to claim 16 , wherein neurological states that constitute an emergency condition include seizure, abnormal brainstem response, or burst suppression.

18. The method according to claim 15 , further comprising:

determining if an abnormal neurological state that is organic in nature is global or lateral.

19. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

graphically displaying the determination;

graphically displaying representations of the brain based on the determination;

storing data related to the determination.

20. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of extracting features comprises:

performing a high-speed quantitative electroencephalograph (qEEG) algorithm on the de-noised signals to extract features.

21. A method for providing a triage assessment of a patient's brain function comprising the steps of:

measuring, using electrodes, the spontaneous brain activity of the patient;

stimulating the patient and measuring the evoked brain activity therefrom;

processing, using a processor coupled to a memory having instructions for processing stored therein, the spontaneous and evoked brain activity, wherein

the processing is performed in real-time using a wavelet-packet algorithm to extract signal features;

providing a triage assessment of the patient based on the processed brain activity.

22. The method according to claim 21 , wherein

the steps of processing and providing an assessment are performed by a portable hand-held device.

23. A method of determining a neurological state of a subject comprising the steps of:

acquiring spontaneous and evoked signals through an electrode set;

processing the spontaneous and evoked signals using a processor coupled to a memory having instructions for processing stored therein, wherein processing the spontaneous and evoked signals further comprises the steps of:

de-noising the acquired signals;

extracting features from the de-noised signals;

classifying the extracted features; and

determining a neurological state of the subject based on the classification, wherein determining the neurological state further comprises the steps of:

determining if the neurological state is normal or abnormal; and

determining if an abnormal neurological state that is organic in nature is global or lateral.

24. The method according to claim 23 , wherein the spontaneous signals comprise electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and the evoked signals comprise auditory evoked potentials (AEP).

25. The method according to claim 23 , wherein the step of extracting features from the denoised signal comprises using a wavelet packet transform algorithm.

26. The method of claim 23 , wherein said classifying step further comprises non-linear classification.

27. A method of determining a neurological state of a subject comprising the steps of:

acquiring brain electrical signals using a set of neurological electrodes;

processing the acquired brain electrical signals using a processor coupled to a memory having instructions for processing stored therein, wherein processing the acquired brain electrical signals further comprises the steps of:

de-noising the acquired signals;

extracting features from the de-noised signals;

classifying the extracted features into a first set of diagnostic categories using discriminant analysis, wherein the first set of diagnostic categories are indicative of whether the subject has a normal or an abnormal neurological state; and

classifying an abnormal brain state into a second set of diagnostic categories using discriminant analysis, wherein the second set of diagnostic categories are indicative of whether the subject's abnormal neurological state is psychiatric or “functional” in nature, organic in nature, or an emergency or “Alert” condition.

28. The method according to claim 27 , wherein an emergency or “Alert” condition is further classified into diagnostic categories indicative of seizure, abnormal brainstem response, or burst suppression.

29. The method according to claim 27 , wherein an organic condition is further classified into diagnostic categories indicative of a global or lateral abnormality.

30. The method according to claim 27 , wherein electrical brain signals comprise spontaneous brain signals.

31. The method according to claim 27 , wherein the electrical brain signals comprise evoked potentials.

32. The method according to claim 27 , wherein the electrical brain signals comprise spontaneous brain signals and evoked potentials.

33. The method according to claim 27 , wherein the extracted features comprise quantitative non-linear features.

34. The method of claim 27 , wherein said classifying step further comprises non-linear classification.

Assignments (11)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2021
From: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
To: BRAINSCOPE SPV LLC
Reel/Frame 057454/0549 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2021
From: BRAINSCOPE SPV LLC
To: AON IP ADVANTAGE FUND LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 057454/0570 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2021
From: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
To: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 056872/0953 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 23, 2015
From: SANDY SPRING BANK
To: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 036864/0714 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 23, 2015
From: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
Reel/Frame 036871/0664 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2015
From: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
To: SANDY SPRING BANK
Reel/Frame 035958/0201 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2015
From: ALOHA BS HOLDINGS LLC
To: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 036063/0237 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 6, 2009
From: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
To: ALOHA BS HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 022354/0307 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2007
From: EVEREST BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTS COMPANY, INC.
To: BS HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 019047/0548 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2007
From: BS HOLDINGS, INC.
To: BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 019047/0613 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2005
From: CAUSEVIC, ELVIR; COMBS, ARTHUR H.
To: EVEREST BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CO.
Reel/Frame 017227/0407 →