IP Library Granted Patent US 7,491,860
Granted Patent B2
US 7,491,860 · App. 11/196,033 · Granted Feb 17, 2009

Dehydrogenation process

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,491,860
App. No.
11/196,033
Granted
Feb 17, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process for adiabatic, non-oxidative dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons including passing a hydrocarbon feed stream through a catalyst bed, wherein the catalyst bed includes a first layer of a catalyst and second layer of a catalyst, wherein the catalyst of the first layer has high activity but a higher capacity for producing coke than the catalyst of the second layer and the second catalyst also has high activity but a lower capacity for producing coke than the catalyst of the first layer.

Claims (20)

1. A process for the dehydrogenation of aliphatic hydrocarbons, comprising (a) loading a first dehydrogenation catalyst in a first layer of a catalyst bed in a reactor; (b) loading a second dehydrogenation catalyst in a second layer of the catalyst bed in the reactor; (c) reducing the catalysts; and (d) introducing a feed stream to the catalyst bed, comprising an aliphatic hydrocarbon, such that the feed stream initially contacts the catalyst in the first catalyst layer and then the catalyst in the second catalyst layer, wherein the first catalyst comprises a catalyst with high activity but a higher capacity for producing coke than the catalyst of the second layer, and the second catalyst comprises a catalyst with the same or different activity, but a reduced capacity to make coke from the capacity of the catalyst of the first layer, wherein the composition of the catalysts of the first and second layers comprises from about 70 to about 90% by weight of alumina and from about 10 to about 30% by weight of one or more chromium compounds, and wherein the composition of the catalysts of the first layer contains a higher percentage of Cr +6 components, by weight, than the catalysts of the second layer.

2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the second layer produces about 20 to about 80% by weight less coke than the catalyst in the first layer.

3. The process of claim 1 , wherein the chromium compounds of the catalysts of the first layer comprise at least about 1.2% of a Cr 6+ composition, by weight.

4. The process of claim 1 , wherein the chromium compounds of the catalysts of the second layer comprise from about 0.01 to less than 1.1% by weight Cr 6+ compounds, based on the total weight of the catalyst.

5. The process of claim 1 , wherein the composition of the catalyst of the second layer further comprises at least 0.5 to about 0.7% of Na 2 O by weight.

6. The process of claim 5 , wherein the composition of the catalyst of the second layer, instead of including at least 0.5 to about 0.7 weight percent of Na 2 O, instead comprises another alkali metal compound on an equivalent molar basis.

7. The process of claim 1 , wherein the composition of the catalyst of the first layer further comprises from about 0.5 to about 1.7% by weight of a nickel compound, calculated as NiO.

8. The process of claim 1 , wherein the composition of the catalyst of the first layer further comprises from about 100 ppm to about 10,000 ppm of a Pt compound.

9. The process of claim 1 , wherein the composition of the catalyst of the first layer further comprises less than 0.5% by weight of Na 2 O.

10. The process of claim 9 , wherein the composition of the catalyst of the first layer, instead of including less than 0.5% by weight Na 2 0, instead comprises another alkali metal compound on an equivalent molar basis.

11. The process of claim 1 , wherein the surface area of the catalyst of the first layer is greater than the surface area of the catalyst of the second layer.

12. The process of claim 1 , wherein the surface area of the catalyst of the first layer is at least 90 m 2 /g.

13. The process of claim 1 , wherein the surface area of the catalyst of the first layer is greater than 90 m 2 /g to about 120 m 2 /g.

14. The process of claim 1 , wherein the surface area of the catalyst of the second layer is from about 50 m 2 /g to 90 m 2 /g.

15. The process of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the first layer comprises from about 85% to 50% by weight of the catalysts in the reactor.

16. The process of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the second layer comprises from about 15% to less than 50% by weight of the catalysts in the reactor.

17. The process of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the first layer is calcined in a steam/air atmosphere with a steam concentration no more than 20% by volume of added steam.

18. The process of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the second layer is calcined in a steam/air atmosphere with a steam concentration greater than 20 to 100% by volume of added steam.

19. The process of claim 1 , wherein the catalyst of the second layer is calcined in a steam/air atmosphere with a steam concentration from about 80 to 100% by volume of added steam.

20. The process of claim 1 , wherein the average pore size of the pores on the catalyst of the first layer is smaller than the average pore size of the pores on the catalyst of the second layer.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY DEED OF ASSIGNMENT EFFECTIVE DEC. 31, 2017 Recorded Jan 28, 2021
From: CLARIANT CORPORATION
To: CLARIANT INTERNATIONAL LTD.
Reel/Frame 055160/0912 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 27, 2021
From: SUD-CHEMIE INC.
To: CLARIANT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055139/0688 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2005
From: FRIDMAN, VLADIMIR; URBANCIC, MICHAEL; ROKICKI, ANDRZEJ
To: SUD-CHEMIE INC.
Reel/Frame 016865/0593 →