IP Library Granted Patent US 7,303,041
Granted Patent B2
US 7,303,041 · App. 11/207,963 · Granted Dec 4, 2007

Vehicle soft impact detection

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,303,041
App. No.
11/207,963
Granted
Dec 4, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicle soft impact detection system uses a piezo film mounted to a front vehicle bumper. The piezo film is selected and mounted to have a greater sensitivity to low-frequency shock waves as compared to high-frequency shock waves, the frequency and amplitude is then compared to a selected range of frequencies and amplitudes that are indicative of a crash with a soft tissue body. In a further embodiment the output of the piezo film is compared with the output of a second sensor which is more sensitive to high-frequency shock waves than to low-frequency shock waves such as a Terfenol-D based sensor.

Claims (23)

1. A vehicle soft impact detection system for differentiating between an automobile front bumper impact with a rigid object and a front bumper impact with a pedestrian or animal, the system comprising:

a piezoelectric film sensor mounted to a front bumper in shock receiving relation;

a giant magnetostrictive sensing element mounted to the front bumper in shock receiving relation; and

a safety system in signal receiving relation to the piezoelectric film sensor, and to the giant magnetostrictive sensing element, the safety system in controlling relation to at least one device.

2. A method of differentiating an automobile front bumper impact with a pedestrian or animal from other types of impacts, comprising the steps of:

upon impact with an object, receiving a first signal from a piezoelectric film sensor mounted to the front bumper in shock receiving relation;

substantially simultaneously with receiving the first signal from the piezoelectric film sensor, receiving a second signal from a giant magnetostrictive sensing element which is mounted to the front bumper in shock receiving relation; and

comparing the first signal with the second signal to determine if an impact with a pedestrian or animal has occurred.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of comparing the first signal with the second signal to determine if an impact with a pedestrian or animal has occurred, comprises:

determining from the first signal, a first amplitude at a frequency or range of frequencies below 1,000_Hz;

determining from the second signal, a second amplitude at a frequency or range of frequencies above 10,000 Hz; and

comparing the first amplitude with the second amplitude and determining if an impact with a pedestrian or animal has occurred.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of comparing the first signal with the second signal comprises determining a ratio of relative signal strength, and comparing the first signal with at least two amplitude standards, and comparing the second signal with at least two amplitude standards.

5. A method of differentiating an automobile front bumper impact with a pedestrian or animal from other types of impacts, comprising the steps of:

upon impact with an object, receiving a first signal from a piezoelectric film sensor mounted to the front bumper in shock receiving relation;

substantially simultaneously with receiving the first signal from the piezoelectric film sensor, receiving a second signal from a second different type of sensor which is more responsive to high-frequency stress waves, where the second type of sensor is mounted to the front bumper in shock receiving relation;

comparing the first signal with the second signal to determine if an impact with a pedestrian or animal or another type of impact has occurred.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the second different type of sensor is a giant magnetostrictive sensing element which is mounted in shock receiving relation to the front bumper.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein the step of comparing the first signal with the second signal to determine if an impact with a pedestrian or animal has occurred, comprises:

determining from the first signal, a first amplitude at a frequency or range of frequencies below 1,000 13 Hz;

determining from the second signal, a second amplitude at a frequency or range of frequencies above 10,000 Hz; and

comparing the first amplitude with the second amplitude, and determining if an impact with a pedestrian or animal has occurred.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein the step of comparing the first signal with the second signal includes determining a ratio of relative signal strength, and comparing the first signal with at least two amplitude standards, and comparing the second signal with at least two amplitude standards.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2014
From: KEY SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
To: LITTELFUSE, INC.
Reel/Frame 033115/0636 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 4, 2013
From: CITICORP USA, INC.
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
Reel/Frame 029565/0125 →