IP Library Patent Application 11218807
Patent Application
App. No. 11/218,807

Point of care diagnostic systems

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/218,807
Abstract

Systems and methods for medical diagnosis or risk assessment for a patient are provided. These systems and methods are designed to be employed at the point of care, such as in emergency rooms and operating rooms, or in any situation in which a rapid and accurate result is desired. The systems and methods process patient data, particularly data from point of care diagnostic tests or assays, including immunoassays, electrocardiograms, X-rays and other such tests, and provide an indication of a medical condition or risk or absence thereof. The systems include an instrument for reading or evaluating the test data and software for converting the data into diagnostic or risk assessment information.

Claims (49)

1 . A method of classifying an image, comprising:

reducing the image to a set of derived parameters that can be used to reconstruct the image within a specified degree of tolerance;

inputting the derived parameters into a classification means; and

determining the classification of the image based on the output of the classification means.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the classification means is a neural network.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the means of reducing the image to a set of derived parameters comprises:

defining a mathematical function containing a plurality of parameters representative of the image; and

optimizing the parameters of the mathematical function using a numerical technique that minimizes the error between the image and a reconstruction of the image using the mathematical function.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the means of reducing the image to a set of derived parameters comprises:

inputting the image to a trained neural network, wherein the inputs to the network represent the image, the network comprises a hidden layer where the number of hidden elements is smaller than the number of inputs to the network, and the outputs of the network represent the reconstruction of the image; and

setting the derived parameters to the output values of the trained neural network.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the means of reducing the image to a set of derived parameters comprises:

defining a neural network wherein the inputs to the network are the coordinates of a point in the image, a hidden layer contains a plurality of elements, and the output of the network represents the reconstruction of the associated point in the image;

training the neural network so that the error between the network output and the image are minimized for all points in the image; and

setting the derived parameters to the weights of the hidden layer of the trained neural network.

6 . A method for determining results from a test strip, comprising:

(a) measuring light reflected from the surface of the test strip to obtain a reflectance signal, wherein the reflectance signal is indicative of the presence of the analyte; and

(b) processing the data obtained from the reflectance signal using data processing software employing data reduction and curve fitting algorithms and/or a trained neural network to convert the reflectance signal into a result indicative of the presence or absence or a threshold concentration of analyte in a sample by a process of claim 1 .

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the classification means is a neural network.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the means of reducing the image to a set of derived parameters comprises:

defining a mathematical function containing a plurality of parameters representative of the image; and

optimizing the parameters of the mathematical function using a numerical technique that minimizes the error between the image and a reconstruction of the image using the mathematical function.

9 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the means of reducing the image to a set of derived parameters comprises:

inputting the image to a trained neural network, wherein the inputs to the network represent the image, the network comprises a hidden layer where the number of hidden elements is smaller than the number of inputs to the network, and the outputs of the network represent the reconstruction of the image; and

setting the derived parameters to the output values of the trained neural network.

10 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the means of reducing the image to a set of derived parameters comprises:

defining a neural network wherein the inputs to the network are the coordinates of a point in the image, a hidden layer contains a plurality of elements, and the output of the network represents the reconstruction of the associated point in the image;

training the neural network so that the error between the network output and the image are minimized for all points in the image; and

setting the derived parameters to the weights of the hidden layer of the trained neural network.

11 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the processing of data process, comprises:

(i) reducing the raw reflectance data;

(ii) plotting the reduced data to generate a second image of the data;

(iii) expressing the second image as a polynomial mathematical function to generate parameters that define this image; and

(iv) comparing the parameters to parameters generated from a reference sample, whereby a positive, negative or quantitative result is obtained.

12 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the data is processed by a process, comprising:

(i) optionally correcting the reflectance readings to correct for light leakage;

(ii) reducing the raw reflectance data using a ratiometric formula;

(iii) generating a second image of the test data by plotting the reduced data;

(iv) expressing the second image as a polynomial mathematical function, and generating parameters that define the image;

(v) comparing the scanned image and second image by solving the linear regression through the curves;

(vi) validating the parameters obtained from the curve-fitting and the peak heights obtained to obtain a validated result; and

(vii) classifying the validated result as positive or negative by comparing peak heights of a clinical sample to reference samples.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the data processing process, further comprises:

(viii) inputting the validated result into a decision-support system to generate a medical diagnosis or risk assessment.

14 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the data processing process, further comprises:

(viii) inputting the result into a decision-support system to generate a medical diagnosis or risk assessment.

15 . A method for determining results from a test strip, comprising:

(a) scanning the test strip in a reflectance reader to obtain a scanned image, wherein the signal is indicative of the presence of the analyte; and

(b) processing the data obtained from the reflectance signals using data processing software employing data reduction and curve fitting algorithms and/or a trained neural network to convert the reflectance signal obtained from reading the test strip into data indicative of the test results' presence or absence or a threshold concentration of analyte in a sample by a process of claim 1.

Assignments (5)
TERMINATION OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS Recorded Aug 26, 2010
From: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: HOLOGIC, INC.; R2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; BIOLUCENT, LLC; DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY CORP.; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CYTYC CORPORATION; CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS III, INC.; CYTYC PRENATAL PRODUCTS CORP.; THIRD WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 024892/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 29, 2008
From: CYTYC CORPORATION
To: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 021301/0879 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 26, 2007
From: CYTYC CORPORATION
To: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.
Reel/Frame 020018/0529 →
MERGER Recorded Sep 6, 2007
From: ADEZA BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION
To: CYTYC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019794/0600 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 6, 2005
From: ANDERSON, EMORY V.; LAPOINTE, JEROME P.; HUSSA, ROBERT; MARTINEZ, RICARDO R.; NEMEC, EDWARD; DESIENO, DUANE
To: ADEZA BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 016854/0775 →