IP Library Granted Patent US 8,055,952
Granted Patent B2
US 8,055,952 · App. 11/225,989 · Granted Nov 8, 2011

Dynamic tuning of a software rejuvenation method using a customer affecting performance metric

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,055,952
App. No.
11/225,989
Granted
Nov 8, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for triggering a software rejuvenation system and/or method includes receiving a request for resources, determining an estimated response time to the request for resources, determining that the estimated response time is greater than a first threshold, determining that a number of estimated response times greater than the first threshold is greater than or equal to a dynamic second threshold, and triggering the software rejuvenation system and/or method.

Claims (38)

1. A computer-implemented method for triggering a software rejuvenation system or method comprising:

receiving a request for resources;

determining an estimated response time to the request for resources;

determining that the estimated response time is greater than a first threshold;

determining that a number of estimated response times greater than the first threshold is greater than or equal to a dynamic second threshold; and

triggering the software rejuvenation system or method.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the estimated response time comprises:

sampling a plurality of response times; and

determining an average response time, wherein the average response time is used as the estimated response time.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first threshold varies according to a number of estimated response times greater than the first threshold, and the dynamic second threshold is determined each time the first threshold is varied.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , further comprising increasing the first threshold with the number of response times greater than the first threshold.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the dynamic second threshold is a positive integer.

6. A computer-implemented method for triggering a software rejuvenation system or method comprising:

receiving a request for resources;

determining a response time to the request for resources;

increasing a number of response times greater than a first threshold upon determining that the response time is greater than the first threshold;

decreasing the number of response times greater than the first threshold upon determining that the response time is less than the first threshold;

determining that the number of response times greater than the first threshold is greater than or equal to a dynamic second threshold; and

triggering the software rejuvenation system or method.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising:

increasing the first threshold by a number of standard deviations upon determining the number of response times greater than the first threshold is greater than D, wherein the first threshold can be increased K standard deviations, and wherein K and D are the same or different positive integers, and the second threshold is K multiplied by D; and

re-determining the dynamic second threshold upon increasing the first threshold.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising:

decreasing the first threshold by a number of standard deviations upon determining the number of response times greater than the first threshold is less than D, wherein the first threshold can be decreased K standard deviations, and wherein K and D are the same or different positive integers, and the second threshold is K multiplied by D; and

re-determining the dynamic second threshold upon decreasing the first threshold.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the request for resources is generated by a client.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the request for resources is generated by a load injector.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising initializing with the number of response times greater than the first threshold at zero, the first threshold set at a lowest level, and the dynamic second threshold at a highest level.

12. A computer-implemented method for distinguishing between a burst of requests and a decrease in performance of a software product comprising:

receiving a plurality of requests for resources;

comparing each of the plurality of requests to a first variable threshold;

varying the first variable threshold to distinguish between a burst of requests and a decrease in performance of a software product for handling the plurality of requests;

varying a second variable threshold upon varying the first variable threshold; and

triggering a software rejuvenation system or method upon determining that a number of response times greater than the variable threshold at a predetermined highest level is greater than or equal to the second variable threshold.

13. The computer implemented method of claim 12 , further comprising:

determining a source of each request causing the software rejuvenation to be triggered; and

determining a common source of a predetermined number of the requests causing the software rejuvenation to be triggered, wherein the software rejuvenation system or method is triggered at a computer node nearest to the common source from among a plurality of computer nodes.

14. The computer implemented method of claim 12 , further comprising initializing with the number of response times greater than the first variable threshold at zero, the first variable threshold set at a lowest level, and the second variable threshold at a highest level.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2024
From: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 068334/0051 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2006
From: SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH, INC.
To: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 017819/0323 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2005
From: AVRITZER, ALBERTO; BONDI, ANDRE B.
To: SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH, INC.
Reel/Frame 016856/0857 →