Method for detecting fraud in a printed image

1. A method for authenticating an image, the image produced by columns of printed pixels, the method comprising the steps of

scanning the image to produce digital data;

segmenting the digital data into first and second groups of digital data corresponding, respectively, to first and second predefined sections of the image;

determining an anticipated spatial position of select columns of printed pixels from each of the first and second groups of digital data; and

examining the first and second groups of digital data to identify a difference in the anticipated spatial position and an actual spatial position of select columns from each of the first and second groups of digital data,

whereby the authenticity of the printed image may be determined based upon the identified differences in the anticipated and actual spatial positions of the select columns of printed pixels.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the identified difference is one of a rotary and linear displacement in the actual spatial position of the select columns.

3. The method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of

converting each of the first and second groups of digital data from a spatial domain to a frequency domain;

identifying data peaks in each of the first and second groups of digital data, the data peaks in the frequency domain of each of the first and second groups of digital data being indicative of a beat frequency, and

wherein the identified difference is a change in the beat frequency of the first group of digital data as compared to the beat frequency of the second group of digital data.

4. The method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of

converting each of the first and second groups of digital data from a spatial domain to a frequency domain;

identifying data peaks in each of the first and second groups of digital data, the data peaks in the frequency domain of each of the first and second groups of digital data being indicative of a beat frequency, and

wherein the identified difference is a phase shift in the beat frequency of the first and second groups of digital data.

5. The method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of:

providing an indication that the printed image is invalid when differences have been identified between the anticipated and actual spatial positions of select columns.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein, prior to the scanning step, identified differences have been intentionally introduced into the printed image, and further comprising the step of:

providing an indication that the printed image is valid when the identified differences are present.

7. A method for authenticating a postage indicium, the postage indicium produced by a plurality of columns of printed pixels, the method comprising the steps of

scanning the postage indicium to produce digital data;

segmenting the digital data into first and second groups of digital data corresponding, respectively, to a graphic and barcode image sections of the postage indicium;

determining an anticipated spatial position of select columns of printed pixels from each of the first and second groups of digital data; and

examining the first and second groups of digital data to identify a difference in the anticipated spatial position and an actual spatial position of select columns from each of the first and second groups of digital data,

whereby the authenticity of the postage indicium may be determined based upon the identified differences in the anticipated and actual spatial positions of the select columns of printed pixels.

8. The method according to claim 7 wherein the identified difference is one of a rotary and linear displacement in the actual spatial position of the select columns.

9. The method according to claim 7 further comprising the step of

converting each of the first and second groups of digital data from a spatial domain to a frequency domain;

identifying data peaks in each of the first and second groups of digital data, the data peaks in the frequency domain of each of the first and second groups of digital data being indicative of a beat frequency, and

wherein the identified difference is a change in the beat frequency of the first group of digital data as compared to the beat frequency of the second group of digital data.

10. The method according to claim 7 further comprising the step of

converting each of the first and second groups of digital data from a spatial domain to a frequency domain;

identifying data peaks in each of the first and second groups of digital data, the data peaks in the frequency domain of each of the first and second groups of digital data being indicative of a beat frequency, and

wherein the identified difference is a phase shift in the beat frequency of the first and second groups of digital data.

11. The method according to claim 7 wherein the postage indicium is scanned at a predefined scan resolution and further comprising the steps of:

reading the barcode image section of the postage indicium to determine a postage meter identification number, the postage meter having a predetermined print resolution,

calculating an anticipated beat frequency of the image as a function of the predefined scan resolution and the predetermined print resolution; and

providing an indication that the printed image is valid when the actual beat frequency is within a threshold range of the anticipated beat frequency.

12. A method for authenticating an image having printed pixels defining a plurality of columns, the method comprising the steps of:

determining a first spatial separation between adjacent columns of the image;

determining a second spatial separation between adjacent columns of the image, the second spatial separation being different than the first spatial separation; and

printing the image such that adjacent columns are separated by the first spatial separation and at least two columns are separated by the second spatial separation,

whereby the image may be authenticated based upon a determination that the second spatial separation is present.

13. The method according to claim 12 further comprising:

scanning the printed image;

examining the scanned printed image to determine if the second spatial separation is present, and

authenticating the printed image as being valid upon confirmation that the second spatial separation is present.

14. The method according to claim 13 wherein the scanning step is performed by an automated scanning device.

15. The method according to claim 12 wherein the image is printed by a digital printer having a strobe clock, the strobe clock issuing a timing signal for controlling the first spatial separation between each of the plurality of columns, and further including the step of introducing a change in the timing signal to produce the second spatial separation.

16. The method according to claim 15 wherein the change is a delay in the timing signal.

17. The method according to claim 15 wherein the digital printer is a postage meter and wherein the printed image is a postage indicium.

18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the postage indicium includes at least two sections and wherein the second spatial separation is introduced between the first and second sections of the postage indicium.

19. The method according to claim 12 wherein the second spatial separation is less than twice the first spatial separation.

20. The method according to claim 18 wherein the first section corresponds to a graphic section of the postage indicium and wherein the second section corresponds to a barcode section of the postage indicium.