IP Library Granted Patent US 7,609,641
Granted Patent B2
US 7,609,641 · App. 11/268,102 · Granted Oct 27, 2009

System and method for providing a congestion-aware routing metric for selecting a route between nodes in a multihopping communication network

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,609,641
App. No.
11/268,102
Granted
Oct 27, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for calculating a routing metric that can select the route providing the best throughput in a multihopping network ( 100 ), based on one or more parameters including completion rates, data rates, MAC overhead and congestion. The system and method are capable of selecting a route in a multihopping network ( 100 ) having a high throughput, comprising calculating a routing metric at one or more nodes ( 102, 106, 107 ), wherein the routing metric enables the one or more nodes ( 102, 106, 107 ) to select the route in the network ( 100 ). The routing metric can include network information such as the raw data rate, the completion rate, and the media access control overhead and congestion.

Claims (53)

1. A method of operation of a node for routing data in a wireless network, the method comprising:

for one or more routes from the node to another node:

determining information pertaining to transmission of a packet, the information comprising a packet length, a data rate, a packet completion rate, a transmission time of the packet, an additional time for retransmission of a failed packet, and a time elapsed between arrival of a received packet at the node and a first attempt at transmission of a packet by the node in response to the received packet, and

calculating a routing metric based on the determined information; and

selecting a route having a best routing metric for communication of at least one subsequent packet from the node to the another node.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

operating the node to allocate an amount of bandwidth for transmission of the subsequent packet based on the routing metric of the selected route.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 , further comprising:

operating the node to transmit a plurality of said subsequent packets to achieve a level of throughput based on the amount of bandwidth allocated for transmission.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

operating the node to determine the another node to which to transmit the subsequent packet based on the routing metric.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

performing the determining step for a plurality of nodes in the network; and

calculating the routing metric based on the respective information determined at each of the plurality of nodes.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

operating the node to provide information pertaining to the routing metric.

7. A node, operating within a wireless communication network, the node comprising:

a transceiver, operating to transmit and receive packets; and

a controller, operating to:

determine information pertaining to transmission of a packet each of one or more routes from the node to another node, the information comprising a packet length, a data rate, a packet completion rate, a transmission time of the packet, an additional time for retransmission of a failed packet by the transceiver, and a time elapsed between arrival of a received packet at the transceiver and a first attempt at transmission of a packet by the transceiver in response to the received packet,

calculate a routing metric based on the determined information for each of the one or more routes, and

select a route having a best routing metric for communication of at least one subsequent packet.

8. A node as claimed in claim 7 , wherein:

the controller further allocates an amount of bandwidth for transmission of the subsequent packet based on the routing metric of the selected route.

9. A node as claimed in claim 8 , wherein:

the controller further controls the transceiver to transmit a plurality of said subsequent packets to achieve a level of throughput based on the amount of bandwidth allocated for transmission.

10. A node as claimed in claim 7 , wherein:

the controller further determines the another node to which to control the transceiver to transmit the subsequent packet based on the routing metric of the selected route.

11. A node as claimed in claim 7 , wherein:

the controller further calculates the routing metric based on the determined information and information pertaining to the routing metric received from a plurality of other nodes in the network.

12. A node as claimed in claim 7 , wherein:

the controller further controls the node to provide information pertaining to the routing metric.

13. A node as claimed in claim 7 , wherein:

the controller further controls the transceiver to transmit information pertaining to the routing metric for receipt by at least one other node in the network.

14. A method for communicating in a wireless communication network, the method comprising:

operating a plurality of nodes, communicating in the wireless network, to each determine respective information comprising a packet length, a data rate, a packet completion rate, a transmission time of a packet, an additional time for retransmission of a failed packet, and a time elapsed between arrival of a received packet and a first attempt at transmission of a packet by the node in response to the received packet;

operating the plurality of nodes to transmit their respective information for receipt by other nodes; and

operating each of the plurality of nodes to calculate a respective routing metric based on their respective information and the information received from the other nodes.

15. A method as claimed in claim 14 , further comprising:

operating each of the nodes to allocate a respective amount of bandwidth for transmission of the subsequent packet based on their respective calculated routing metric.

16. A method claimed in claim 15 , further comprising:

operating each of the nodes to transmit a respective plurality of subsequent packets to achieve a respective level of throughput based on their respective amount of bandwidth allocated for transmission.

17. A method as claimed in claim 14 , further comprising:

operating each of the nodes to determine to which other node to transmit their respective subsequent packet based on their respective routing metric.

18. A method for providing a congestion-aware routing metric for selecting a route between nodes in a multihopping communication network, the method comprising:

calculating an associated routing metric for each of a plurality of routes between a source node and a destination node based on one or more parameters including a completion rate, a data rates, a media access control (MAC) overhead and a congestion, wherein one or more of the plurality of routes comprise a multihop route, and further wherein the associated routing metric of the multihop route comprises a cumulative routing metric calculated using an individual routing metric of each of a plurality of hops within the multihopping route;

selecting a route for communication between the source node and the destination node with the best associated routing metric;

determining whether communication in one hop of the multihop route and communication in another hop of the multihop route can occur concurrently;

allotting more bandwidth along the multihop route when the communications can occur concurrently; and

decreasing the throughput along the multihop route when the communications cannot occur concurrently.

19. A method for providing a congestion-aware routing metric for selecting a route between nodes in a multihopping communication network, the method comprising:

calculating an associated routing metric for each of a plurality of routes between a source node and a destination node based on one or more parameters including a completion rate, a data rates, a media access control (MAC) overhead and a congestion, wherein the calculating the associated routing metric for each of a plurality of routes between a source node and a destination node further is based on a transmission time of a packet, an extra time required for retransmission of a failed packet, a time elapsed between the packet arrival to the node's queue and this packet's first transmission attempt; and

selecting a route for communication between the source node and the destination node with the best associated routing metric.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 049905/0504 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC (F/K/A ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.); ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; RUCKUS WIRELESS, LLC (F/K/A RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 071477/0255 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2024
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE INC., OF NORTH CAROLINA; OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC; RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC
Reel/Frame 069889/0114 →
CORRECTIVE BY NULLIFICATION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY RECORDED PROPERTY NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 044806, FRAME 0900. ASSIGNOR HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS. Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 061038/0692 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 11, 2022
From: MESHNETWORKS, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 060978/0116 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST
Reel/Frame 060752/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 049820/0495 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049892/0396 →
TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049905/0504 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2017
From: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 044806/0900 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE: MOTOROLA, INC. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 019030 FRAME 0886. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEE SHOULD READ: MESHNETWORKS, INC. 485 NORTH KELLER ROAD SUITE 250 MAITLAND, FLORIDA 32751-7535. Recorded Sep 11, 2009
From: STRUTT, GUENAEL T.; ZENG, SURONG; OZER, SEBNEM Z.; JOSHI, AVINASH
To: MESHNETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023222/0170 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 2ND ASSIGNOR, ZENG, SURON INCORRECT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 001746 FRAME 0592. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNOR: ZENG, SURONG. Recorded Mar 19, 2007
From: STRUTT, GUENAEL T.; ZENG, SURONG; OZER, SEBNEM Z.; JOSHI, AVINASH
To: MOTOROLA, INC.
Reel/Frame 019030/0886 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2006
From: STRUTT, GUENAEL T.; ZENG, SURON; OZER, SEBNEM Z.; JOSHI, AVINASH
To: MESHNETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 017246/0592 →