Method for responding to denial of service attacks at the session layer or above
View Patent ↗In a method for responding to a denial of service attack at a higher layer of a communication network, said communication network also having a lower layer beneath the higher layer for receiving packet information from users, providing a packet filter inspection layer between the higher layer and the lower layer. By use of an application layer which is associated with or comprises said higher layer, creating a rule in the packet filter layer to identify a likely denial of service attack. By use of the packet filter inspection layer, inspecting incoming packet information to determine whether it is a likely denial of service attack, and if it is stopping the incoming packet information from being sent to the application layer. After a predetermined time period, stopping use of the rule to prevent packet information from being sent through to the application layer.
1. A method for protecting against a denial of service attack at a higher layer of a communication network protocol stack, the method comprising:
at the higher layer of the communication network protocol stack, wherein the higher layer is positioned above a session layer:
receiving a plurality of packets containing packet information of the higher layer and racket information of a lower layer in the communication network protocol stack, wherein the lower layer is below the session layer;
identifying, based on the packet information of the higher layer, a likely denial of service attack, wherein the denial of service attack is difficult to detect at the lower layer because source IP addresses of attack rackets vary during the denial of service attack; and
in response to identifying a likely denial of service attack based on the packet information of the higher layer, dynamically mapping the packet information of the higher layer to packet information of the lower layer and populating the mapped packet information of the lower layer to a packet filter inspection layer positioned between the higher layer and the lower layer, wherein the racket filter inspection layer is positioned below an application layer and the session layer and positioned above a network layer and a transport layer; and
at the packet filter inspection layer:
receiving the dynamically mapped packet information of the lower layer; and
selectively processing the packet using the packet information of the lower layer before the packet is received, from the lower layer, by a boundary of the session layer closest to the lower layer.
2. A method of claim 1 wherein after a predetermined time period, stopping selectively processing the packet.
3. A method of claim 2 wherein selectively processing the packet includes:
creating a list of IP addresses deemed to constitute a likely source of a denial of service attack;
inspecting an IP address of at least one of the plurality of packets to determine whether the IP address is on the list, and if it is on the list, stopping the incoming packet information from being sent to the higher layer; and
after said predetermined time period, stopping use of the list to prevent packet information from being sent through to the higher layer.
4. A method of claim 3 wherein creating said list includes dynamically creating said list based on incoming registrations to an application from IP addresses which are responsible for a denial of service attack.
5. A method of claim 3 wherein creating said list includes creating said list by use of an administrator through a management application which provides IP addresses for placement on the list which the administrator deems to be likely source of a denial of service attack in the future.
6. A method of claim 3 wherein said list comprises a first list, and further including the step of creating a second list in the packet filter layer by use of the application layer of IP addresses deemed not to be a likely source of a denial of service attack by dynamically entering said IP addresses on the second list.
7. A method of claim 6 wherein the second list is also created by an administrator through an management application which enters IP addresses on the second list deemed unlikely by the administrator to be a source of denial of service attack.
8. A method of claim 6 including the step of using the application layer to create a rest list in the packet filter layer, said rest list having IP addresses thereon not contained in the first list and the second list and which are not deemed relevant IP addresses for determination of whether or not there is a denial of service attack.
9. A method of claim 6 wherein the packet filter layer uses the second list to send, through to the higher layer, received packet information from an IP address deemed not likely to be a source for a denial of service attack.
10. A method of claim 3 wherein the IP addresses in the list are converted to a timed entry by the packet filter inspection layer.
11. A method of claim 1 wherein selectively processing the packet includes creating a rule dynamically based on the packet profile.
12. A method of claim 11 wherein said rule is created dynamically without user intervention and by observing network information.
13. A method of claim 11 wherein said rule is created by use of an administrator through a management application.
14. A method of claim 1 wherein the communication network comprises a VoIP network.
15. A method of claim 1 wherein the higher layer comprises an SIP application layer.
16. A method of claim 1 wherein the packet filter layer is provided between a session layer and a transport layer.
17. A method of claim 1 wherein identifying a likely denial of service attack includes identifying a denial of service attack using only session layer packet information.
18. A method of claim 1 wherein identifying a likely denial of service attack includes identifying a denial of service attack using only application layer packet information.
19. A method of claim 1 wherein identifying a likely denial of service attack includes identifying a denial of service attack which can occur at both a session layer and an application layer.
20. A method of claim 1 wherein the higher layer dynamically creates entries of IP addresses in a list based on a registration of an address of record sent from a user, and the packet filter inspection layer decides whether or not to drop an incoming packet, which is an invitation for a communication path, based on whether or not the IP address of the incoming invitation packet is from an IP address which is on the list.
21. A method of claim 1 including provisioning a network layer beneath a transport layer.
22. A VoIP network communication device for responding to a denial of service attack at a higher layer of a communication network protocol stack, said communication network protocol stack also having a lower layer beneath the higher layer for receiving packet information from users, comprising:
a first hardware element of the VoIP network communication device for executing a higher layer of the communication network protocol stack for:
receiving, at the higher layer, a plurality of packets containing packet information of the higher layer and packet information of the lower layer, wherein the lower layer is below the session layer in the communication network protocol stack;
identifying, based on the packet information of the higher layer, a likely denial of service attack, wherein the denial of service attack is difficult to detect at the lower layer because source IP addresses of attack rackets vary during the denial of service attack; and
in response to identifying a likely denial of service attack based on the racket information of the higher layer, dynamically mapping the packet information of the higher layer to packet information of the lower layer and populating the mapped packet information of the lower layer to a packet filter inspection layer positioned between the higher layer and the lower layer, wherein the packet filter inspection layer is positioned below an application and a session layer of the communication network protocol stack and positioned above a network and a transport layer of the communication network protocol stack; and
a second hardware element of the VoIP network communication device for executing a packet filter layer, wherein the racket filter inspection layer is positioned below an application layer and the session layer and positioned above a network layer and a transport layer, the packet filter layer for:
receiving the dynamically mapped packet information of the lower layer;
creating a rule in the packet filter layer to identify a likely denial of service attack by use of the application layer, where the application layer is associated with or comprises said higher layer;
inspecting incoming packet information of the higher layer to determine whether it is a likely denial of service attack; and
in response to determining a likely denial of service attack, selectively processing the packet using the packet information of the lower layer before the racket is received, from the lower layer, at a boundary of the session layer closest to the lower layer.
23. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 wherein after a predetermined time period, the packet filter layer stops use of the rule to prevent packet information from being sent through to the application layer.
24. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 wherein said rule comprises a list in the packet filter layer of IP addresses deemed to constitute a likely source of a denial of service attack;
the packet filter inspection layer inspecting an IP address of the incoming packet information to determine whether the IP address is on the list, and if it is on the list, stopping the incoming packet information from being sent to the application layer; and
after said predetermined time period, said packet filter inspection layer stops use of the list to prevent packet information from being sent through to the application layer.
25. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 including said rule being created dynamically.
26. A VoIP network communication device of claim 25 wherein said rule is created dynamically without user intervention and by observing network information.
27. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 including said rule being created by use of an administrator through a management application.
28. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 wherein the communication network comprises a VoIP network.
29. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 wherein the packet filter layer is provided between a session layer and a transport layer.
30. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 wherein the device includes a session border controller (SBC).
31. A VoIP network communication device of claim 22 wherein the device includes a SIP server.