IP Library Granted Patent US 7,914,362
Granted Patent B2
US 7,914,362 · App. 11/289,930 · Granted Mar 29, 2011

Method of evaluating the quality of a lapping plate

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,914,362
App. No.
11/289,930
Granted
Mar 29, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention pertain to a evaluating the quality of a lapping plate. In one embodiment, information that indicates the quality of a lapping plate is received while the lapping plate is being used to lap a slider, and the information is used to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider.

Claims (41)

1. A method of evaluating the quality of a lapping plate, the method comprising:

magnetically shielding at least one side of a read sensor disposed within a slider and shielding from particles associated with said lapping plate;

receiving information from said read sensor that indicates the quality of a lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap said slider; and

using a quality determiner configured to process the information to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider and which is further configured to determine when the quality of the lapping plate has degraded beyond a threshold value.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the receiving of the information that indicates the quality of a lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap a slider further comprises:

said quality determiner receiving information that indicates resistance associated with the slider.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the using of the information to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider, further comprises:

using said quality determiner to process the information and to determine whether the resistance is fluctuating.

4. The method as recited in claim 3 , wherein the using of the information to determine whether the resistance is fluctuating further comprises:

using said quality determiner to determine whether the resistance fluctuates by more than a certain percentage; and

if the resistance fluctuates by more than the certain percentage determining that the quality of the lapping plate is inadequate.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 , wherein the certain percentage is 1%.

6. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the using of the information to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider further comprises:

using said quality determiner to calculate an average of the resistance; and

said quality determiner using the average of the resistance to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate.

7. The method as recited in claim 6 , further comprising:

said quality determiner using measurements of the resistance received over a time interval that is between 10 milliseconds and 10 seconds to compute the average of the resistance.

8. The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the using of the average of the resistance to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate further comprises:

using said quality determiner to determine whether the average of the resistance fluctuates by more than a certain percentage; and

if the average of the resistance fluctuates by more than the certain percentage determining that the quality of the lapping plate is inadequate.

9. The method as recited in claim 7 , wherein the certain percentage is 1%.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the using of the information to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider further comprises:

using said quality determiner to calculate an a root mean square of the resistance divided by an average of the resistance; and

using the root mean square of the resistance divided by the average of the resistance to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate.

11. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:

said quality determiner using measurements of the resistance received over a time interval that is between 10 milliseconds and 10 seconds to compute the root mean square of the resistance and the average of the resistance.

12. The method as recited in claim 10 , wherein the using of the root mean square of the resistance divided by the average of the resistance to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate further comprises:

using said quality determiner to determine whether the root mean square of the resistance divided by the average of the resistance is greater than a certain percentage; and

if the root mean square of the resistance divided by the average of the resistance is greater than the certain percentage determining that the quality of the lapping plate is inadequate.

13. The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the certain percentage is 1%.

14. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the receiving of the information that indicates the quality of a lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider further comprises:

said quality determiner receiving information that indicates amplitude associated with the slider.

15. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the using of the information to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider further comprises:

said quality determiner using the information that indicates the amplitude to determine whether the amplitude is reversed.

16. The method as recited in claim 15 , wherein the using of the information that indicates the amplitude to determine whether the amplitude is reversed further comprises:

using said quality determiner to determine whether the lapping plate causes a certain percentage or more of sliders being lapped with the lapping plate to have reversed amplitudes.

17. The method as recited in claim 16 , wherein the certain percentage is 4%.

18. The method as recited in claim 16 , further comprising:

said quality determiner determining that a moment of a pinning layer associated with the slider is reversed based on the amplitude.

19. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the using of the information to evaluate the quality of the lapping plate while the lapping plate is being used to lap the slider further comprises:

said quality determiner using the information to reduce the probability of damaging a sensor associated with the slider.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 5, 2016
From: HGST NETHERLANDS B.V.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 040819/0450 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 25, 2012
From: HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B.V.
To: HGST NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 029341/0777 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2006
From: BUNCH, RICHARD DALE; CRAWFORTH, LINDEN JAMES; PADILLA, EDUARDO; WU, XIAO Z.
To: HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 017845/0418 →