IP Library Granted Patent US 8,121,839
Granted Patent B2
US 8,121,839 · App. 11/305,951 · Granted Feb 21, 2012

Method and apparatus for detecting unsolicited multimedia communications

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,121,839
App. No.
11/305,951
Granted
Feb 21, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A service is configured to analyze multimedia communications to determine a likelihood that the communication is unsolicited. For example, the service may inspect e-mail messages, instant messaging messages, facsimile transmissions, voice communications, and video telephony, and analyze these forms of communication to determine whether an intended communication is unsolicited. In connection with voice and video telephony, a voice sample may be obtained from the caller and voice recognition may be performed on the sample to determine an identity of the person or the identity of the voice. The voice sample may also be used to determine the type of voice—i.e. if the voice is live, machine generated, or prerecorded. Where the call is a video telephony call, image recognition may be used to inspect an image of the person. The information obtained from voice recognition, voice type recognition, and image recognition may be used to detect whether the messages if from a known source of unsolicited communications.

Claims (15)

1. A method of determining an identity of an entity placing a telephone call by an anti-SPX service to detect whether an unsolicited telephone call is a Spam Over Internet Telephony (SPIT) telephone call, the method comprising the steps of:

analyzing, by the anti-SPX service, signaling information associated with the telephone call;

obtaining, by the anti-SPX service, a voice sample associated with the entity placing the telephone call;

performing, by the anti-SPX service, a voice recognition process on the voice sample to obtain a voice signature associated with the entity placing the telephone call;

comparing, by the anti-SPX service, the voice signature against voice signatures of entities known to place SPIT be telephone calls; and

determining, by the anti-SPX service, if the telephone call is likely to be a SPIT telephone call from the result of analyzing the signaling information and the result of the voice signature comparison.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of performing a voice type recognition process by the anti-SPX service.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the voice type recognition process is configured to determine if the voice sample is associated with a live person, a prerecorded voice, or a machine generated voice; and wherein the step of determining if the telephone call is likely to be a SPIT telephone call further comprises using the result of the voice type recognition process.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying a person associated with the voice from the voice signature; and wherein the step of determining if the telephone call is likely to be a SPIT telephone call further comprises comparing the identity of the person to determine whether the person is a known source of SPX.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the voice sample is obtained in response to a question, the method further comprising the step of analyzing, by the anti-SPX service, a content of the voice sample; and wherein the step of determining if the telephone call is likely to be a SPIT telephone call further comprises comparing the analyzed content with expected content.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the telephone call is a video telephone call, the method further comprising the step of obtaining, by the anti-SPX service, a video image associated with the video telephone call.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising the step of analyzing, by the anti-SPX service, the video image to obtain a caller identification from the video image; and wherein the step of determining if the telephone call is likely to be a SPIT telephone call further comprises comparing video image with video images of people who are known sources of SPX.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising scoring, by the anti-SPX service, the telephone call, the score being associated with a likelihood that the telephone call is SPIT.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing the signaling information associated with the telephone call comprises detecting whether the call is part of a conference call; the method further comprising the step of detecting whether media associated with the telephone call is being transmitted to multiple destinations simultaneously; and wherein if the media is being transmitted to multiple destinations simultaneously and the signaling indicates that the call is not part of a conference call, the method further comprising the step of determining that the call is likely to be SPIT.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of detecting, by the anti-SPX service, whether media content associated with the telephone call has been previously transmitted to another destination; and wherein the step of determining if the telephone call is likely to be a SPIT telephone call further comprises using the result of the detecting to increase the likelihood that a telephone call is SPIT if the content has previously been transmitted to other destinations.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
Reel/Frame 054305/0505 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2018
From: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 046485/0644 →
RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001) Recorded Jan 2, 2018
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
Reel/Frame 044970/0030 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 9, 2016
From: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038041/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2015
From: ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP; ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM LLC; BOCKSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC; CONSTELLATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC; MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC; NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
Reel/Frame 034924/0779 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2013
From: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP
To: ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
Reel/Frame 030088/0155 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2011
From: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
To: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP
Reel/Frame 027143/0717 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 19, 2005
From: SRIVASTAVA, SAMIR; AUDET, FRANCOIS; VIVEK, VIBHU
To: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 017392/0683 →