IP Library Granted Patent US 7,451,009
Granted Patent B2
US 7,451,009 · App. 11/316,128 · Granted Nov 11, 2008

Method and apparatus for product defect classification

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,451,009
App. No.
11/316,128
Granted
Nov 11, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method and apparatus for processing defect data indicative of defects in a product is described. In one example, each of the defects is assigned one of a plurality of severity levels and one of a plurality of impact levels. The defects are classified into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level. A graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories is generated. The graphic is displayed on a graphical user interface (GUI).

Claims (73)

1. A method of processing defect data indicative of defects in a product, comprising:

receiving defect data from an end-user, wherein the defect data is indicative of defects in a product at an end-user's environment;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of severity levels;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of impact levels;

classifying the defects into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level;

automatically generating a graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories; and

displaying the graphic on a graphical user interface (GUI);

wherein the graphic comprises a histogram having a first axis representing severity level, a second axis representing impact level, and a third axis representing a number of defects, the first axis and the second axis defining bins respectively associated with the categories.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the histogram comprises a three-dimensional bar chart.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of impact levels is associated with an estimated percentage of customers impacted by a corresponding defect.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of severity levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

5. A method of processing defect data indicative of defects in a product, comprising:

receiving defect data from an end-user, wherein the defect data is indicative of defects in a product at an end-user's environment;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of severity levels;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of impact levels;

classifying the defects into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level;

automatically generating a graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories;

displaying the graphic on a graphical user interface (GUI);

assigning a threshold to each of the categories;

comparing the number of defects in each of the categories with the threshold assigned thereto;

automatically displaying, for each category of the categories where the number of defects therein exceeds the threshold assigned thereto, an alert graphic on the GUI; and

assigning each of the categories a priority level;

wherein an action is displayed for each alert graphic based on the priority level assigned to the category.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein each of the plurality of impact levels is associated with an estimated percentage of customers impacted by a corresponding defect.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the plurality of severity levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

8. Apparatus for processing defect data indicative of defects in a product, comprising:

means for receiving defect data from an end-user, wherein the defect data is indicative of defects in a product at an end-user's environment;

means for assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of severity levels;

means for assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of impact levels;

means for classifying the defects into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level;

means for automatically generating a graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories; and

means for displaying the graphic on a graphical user interface (GUI);

wherein the graphic comprises a histogram having a first axis representing severity level, a second axis representing impact level, and a third axis representing a number of defects, the first axis and the second axis defining bins respectively associated with the categories.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein each of the plurality of impact levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of severity levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

11. Apparatus for processing defect data indicative of defects in a product, comprising:

means for receiving defect data from an end-user, wherein the defect data is indicative of defects in a product at an end-user's environment;

means for assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of severity levels;

means for assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of impact levels;

means for classifying the defects into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level;

means for automatically generating a graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories;

means for displaying the graphic on a graphical user interface (GUI);

means for assigning a threshold to each of the categories;

means for comparing the number of defects in each of the categories with the threshold assigned thereto;

means for automatically displaying, for each category of the categories where the number of defects therein exceeds the threshold assigned thereto, an alert graphic on the GUI; and

means for assigning each of the categories a priority level;

wherein an action is displayed for each alert graphic based on the priority level assigned to the category.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein each of the plurality of impact levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of severity levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

14. A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of:

receiving defect data from an end-user, wherein the defect data is indicative of defects in a product at an end-user's environment;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of severity levels;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of impact levels;

classifying the defects into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level;

automatically generating a graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories; and

displaying the graphic on a graphical user interface (GUI);

wherein the graphic comprises a histogram having a first axis representing severity level, a second axis representing impact level, and a third axis representing a number of defects, the first axis and the second axis defining bins respectively associated with the categories.

15. The computer readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein each of the plurality of impact levels is associated with an estimated percentage of customers impacted by a corresponding defect.

16. The computer readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the plurality of severity levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

17. A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of:

receiving defect data from an end-user, wherein the defect data is indicative of defects in a product at an end-user's environment;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of severity levels;

assigning each of the defects one of a plurality of impact levels;

classifying the defects into categories based on combinations of severity level and impact level;

automatically generating a graphic representative of a topographical relation among numbers of defects in the categories;

displaying the graphic on a graphical user interface (GUI);

assigning a threshold to each of the categories;

comparing the number of defects in each of the categories with the threshold assigned thereto; and

automatically displaying, for each category of the categories where the number of defects therein exceeds the threshold assigned thereto, an alert graphic on the GUI; and

assigning each of the categories a priority level;

wherein an action is displayed for each alert graphic based on the priority level assigned to the category.

18. The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein each of the plurality of impact levels is associated with an estimated percentage of customers impacted by a corresponding defect.

19. The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of severity levels are defined with respect to expected performance of the product from an end-user point of view.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2015
From: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
To: GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 035354/0420 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2013
From: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
To: GENERAL INSTRUMENT HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 030764/0575 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2013
From: GENERAL INSTRUMENT HOLDINGS, INC.
To: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Reel/Frame 030866/0113 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2006
From: GRUBB, DAVID; DOBLMAIER, TOM; GOFFIN, GLEN P.; GROAT, EVAN A.; MENSOFF, STEVE; QUIGLEY, DAN
To: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 017614/0210 →