IP Library Granted Patent US 7,764,940
Granted Patent B2
US 7,764,940 · App. 11/325,854 · Granted Jul 27, 2010

System and method for discovering frequency related spurs in a multi-conversion tuner

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,764,940
App. No.
11/325,854
Granted
Jul 27, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention is directed to a system and method of reducing frequency interference in a circuit when the harmonics of at least two frequencies could cause interference when such harmonics interact with each other. In one embodiment, a determination is made as to which harmonic could possibly support such interference, and based upon the determined harmonic, determining which combination within said determined harmonic is likely to cause the interference.

Claims (113)

1. A method for assisting in the determination of non-interfering local oscillator (LO) frequencies (f 1 , and f 2 ) in a dual conversion tuner system, said method comprising:

determining band edges A, B, C, and D of a system output band and its image using the formulae

A=−f OUT −f BW /2

B=−f OUT +f BW /2

C=f OUT −f BW /2

D=f OUT +f BW /2,

 where f OUT is the system output pass band center frequency and f BW is the bandwidth of the system output pass band;

for a selected harmonic of f 1 , calculating a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge A, m A , and a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge D, m D , using the formulae

m A =└( n×f 1 −A )÷ f 2 ┘

m D =└( n×f 1 −D )÷ f 2 ┘,

 where n is the selected harmonic of f 1 ; and

determining if m A =m D .

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

if m A ≠m D , calculating m B using the formula

m B =└( n×f 1 −B )÷ f 2 ┘; and

determining if m A ≠m B .

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

if m A ≠m B , concluding that frequencies f 1 and f 2 result in an interfering spur.

4. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

if m A =m B , calculating m C using the formula

m C =└( n×f 1 −C )÷ f 2 ┘; and

determining if m C ≠m D .

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

if m C ≠m D , concluding that frequencies f 1 and f 2 result in an interfering spur.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

if m C =m D , determining if M D ≧n MAX , where n MAX is a maximum harmonic to be considered; and

if M D ≧n MAX , concluding for the selected harmonic of f 1 that frequencies f 1 and f 2 do not result in an interfering spur.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

if m D <n MAX , selecting a next harmonic of f 1 and repeating, for said next selected harmonic of f 1 , said calculating a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge A, m A , and a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge D, m D , and determining if m A =m D .

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating a first f 1 harmonic (n O ) using the formula

n

O

=

f

2

+

A

f

1

-

f

2

,

where n 0 is a limit on the harmonics of f 1 considered according to the method.

9. A system for assisting in the determination of non-interfering local oscillator (LO) frequencies (f 1 and f 2 ) in a dual conversion tuner system, said system comprising:

means for determining band edges A, B, C, and D of a system output band and its image using the formulae

A=−f OUT −f BW /2

B=−f OUT +f BW /2

C=f OUT −f BW /2

D=f OUT +f BW /2,

 where f OUT is the system output pass band center frequency and f BW is the bandwidth of the system output pass band;

means for calculating, for a selected harmonic of f 1 , a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge A, m A , and a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge D, m D , using the formulae

m A =└( n×f 1 −A )÷ f 2 ┘

m D =└( n×f 1 −D )÷ f 2 ┘

 where n is the selected harmonic of f 1 ; and

means for determining if m A =m D .

10. The system of claim 9 , further comprising:

means for calculating, if m A ≠m D , m B using the formula

m B =└( n×f 1 −B )÷ f 2 ┘; and

means for determining if m A ≠m B .

11. The system of claim 10 , further comprising:

means for concluding if, m A ≠m B , that frequencies f 1 and f 2 result in an interfering spur.

12. The system of claim 10 , further comprising:

means for calculating, if m A =m B , m C using the formula

m C =└( n×f 1 −C )÷ f 2 ┘; and

means for determining if m C ≠m D .

13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising:

means for concluding if, m C ≠m D , that frequencies f 1 and f 2 result in an interfering spur.

14. The system of claim 12 , further comprising:

means for determining, if m C =m D , if m D ≧n MAX , where n MAX is a maximum harmonic to be considered; and

means for concluding, if m D ≧n MAX , for the selected harmonic of f 1 that frequencies f 1 and f 2 do not result in an interfering spur.

15. The system of claim 14 , further comprising:

means for selecting, if m D <n MAX , a next harmonic of f 1 and repeating, for said next selected harmonic of f 1 , said calculating a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge A, m A , and a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge D, m D , and determining if m A =m D .

16. The system of claim 9 , further comprising:

means for calculating a first f 1 harmonic (n O ) using the formula

n

O

=

f

2

+

A

f

1

-

f

2

,

where n 0 is a limit on the harmonics of f 1 considered.

17. A method for assisting in the determination of non-interfering local oscillator (LO) frequencies (f 1 and f 2 ) in a dual conversion tuner system, said method comprising:

determining band edges A, B, C, and D of a system output band and its image, wherein band edge A comprises a lowest frequency band edge of band edges A, B, C, and D and band edge D comprises a highest frequency band edge of band edges A, B, C, and D;

for a selected harmonic of f 1 , calculating a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge A, m A , and a smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge D, m D ; and

determining if m A =m D .

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein said determining band edges A, B, C, and D uses the formulae

A=−f OUT −f BW /2

B=−f OUT +f BW /2

C=f OUT −f BW /2

D=f OUT +f BW /2,

 where f OUT is the system output pass band center frequency and f BW is the bandwidth of the system output pass band.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein said calculating said smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge A, m A , and said smallest harmonic of f 2 greater than band edge D, m D , uses the formulae

m A =└( n×f 1 −A )÷ f 2 ┘

m D =└( n×f 1 −D )÷ f 2 ┘,

where n is the selected harmonic of f 1 .

20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising:

if m A ≠m D , calculating m B using the formula

m B =└( n×f 1 −B )÷ f 2 ┘;

determining if m A ≠m B ; and

if m A ≠m B , concluding that frequencies f 1 and f 2 result in an interfering spur.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2024
From: CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 069221/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2015
From: ZORAN CORPORATION
To: CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 036642/0395 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2012
From: ZORAN CORPORATION
To: CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 027550/0695 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: MICROTUNE (LP), L.L.C.
To: MICROTUNE, INC.
Reel/Frame 025782/0057 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: MICROTUNE, INC.
To: ZORAN CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025782/0047 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: MICROTUNE (TEXAS), L.P.
To: MICROTUNE (LP), L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 025782/0065 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 5, 2006
From: DESSERT, DAVID; SCHNEIDER, JOHN
To: MICROTUNE (TEXAS), L.P.
Reel/Frame 017443/0484 →