IP Library Granted Patent US 7,499,901
Granted Patent B2
US 7,499,901 · App. 11/326,076 · Granted Mar 3, 2009

Ranking items

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,499,901
App. No.
11/326,076
Granted
Mar 3, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of ranking items includes displaying a set of categories. Each category has a set of weights for a user to choose. Each item is associated with the set of categories. The method also includes displaying a search result based on the weights chosen by the user. The search result includes a ranking of the items.

Claims (103)

1. A computer implemented method of ranking sources of products or services, the method comprising:

displaying, on a display, a user interface depicting a plurality of categories;

receiving in the user interface, weights assigned by the user to the categories, the weights indicating degrees of preference of the user for the categories, with the categories

including at least one user selectable factor associated with sources of products or services;

determining total scores for the sources of products or services based on the user defined weights and user selected factors for the categories;

determining a ranking for the sources of products or services based on their respective total scores; and

displaying, on the display, a result including the ranking of the sources of products or services.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

displaying a set of factors for each category when selected by the user, each factor capable of being chosen by the user; and

collating the categories weighted by the user, the factors chosen by the user, and a product chosen by the user.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

selecting a list of companies that have the product; and

determining a rating for each company based on the categories weighted by the user and the factors chosen by the user.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein selecting a list of companies comprises:

finding a set of brands associated with the product; and

finding the company associated with each brand.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein displaying a search result comprises displaying the search result based on the factors chosen by the user.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein displaying a search result comprises ranking the brands on a five-star scale, the five-star scale including a one-star rating, a two-star rating, a thee-star rating, a four-star rating, and a five-star rating.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the five star scale is base on a determined numeric ranking.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving information from an external database; and

quantifying the data on a scale.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein displaying a search result comprises displaying a ranking of companies.

10. An apparatus comprising:

a memory that stores executable instructions for ranking sources of products or services based on a set of user preferences; and

a processor that executes instructions to:

display a plurality of categories;

assign to the categories, weights defined by a user, the weights indicating degrees of preference of the user for the categories, the categories

including at least one user selectable factor associated with sources of products or services;

determine, in a computer system, total scores for the sources of products or services, based on the user defined weights and user selected factors for the categories;

determine, in the computer system, a ranking for the sources of products or services based on their respective total scores; and

display, on the display, a result including the ranking of the sources of products or services.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 , further comprising instructions to:

display a set of factors for each category when selected by the user, each factor capable of being chosen by the user; and

collate the categories weighted by the user, the factors chosen by the user, and a product chosen by the user.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , further comprising instructions to:

select a list of companies that have the product; and

determine a rating for each company based on the categories weighted by the user and the factors chosen by the user.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein instructions to select a list of companies comprises instructions to:

find a set of brands associated with the product; and

find the company associated with each brand.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein instructions to display a search result comprises instructions to display the search result based on the factors chosen by the user.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein instructions to display a search result comprises instructions to rank the brands on a five-star scale, the five-star scale including a one-star rating, a two-star rating, a three-star rating, a four-star rating, and a five-star rating.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , further comprising instructions to use the five-star ranking as the highest of the ratings determined and the one-star ranking as the lowest of the ratings determined.

17. The apparatus of claim 10 , further comprising instructions to:

receive information from an external database; and

quantify the data on a scale.

18. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein instructions to display a search result comprises instructions to display a ranking of companies.

19. An article comprising a machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions for ranking sources of products or services based on a set of user preferences, the instructions causing a machine to:

display a plurality of categories;

receiving in a user interface, weights defined by a user, the weights indicating degrees of preference of the user for the categories, the categories

including at least one user selectable factor associated with sources of products or services;

calculate total scores for the sources of products or services, based on the user defined weights and user selected factors for the categories;

determine a ranking for the sources of products or services based on their respective total scores; and

display a result including the ranking of the sources of products or services.

20. The article of claim 19 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to:

display a set of factors for each category when selected by the user, each factor capable of being chosen by the user; and

collate the categories weighted by the user, the factors chosen by the user, and a product chosen by the user.

21. The article of claim 20 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to:

select a list of companies that have the product; and

determine a rating for each company based on the categories weighted by the user and the factors chosen by the user.

22. The article of claim 21 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to select a list of companies comprises executable instructions causing a machine to:

find a set of brands associated with the product; and

find the company associated with each brand.

23. The article of claim 22 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to display a search result comprises executable instructions causing a machine to display the search result based on the factors chosen by the user.

24. The article of claim 23 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to display a search result comprises executable instructions causing a machine to rank the brands on a five-star scale, the five-star scale including a one-star rating, a two-star rating, a three-star rating, a four-star rating, and a five-star rating.

25. The article of claim 24 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to use the five-star ranking as the highest of the ratings determined and the one-star ranking as the lowest of the ratings determined.

26. The article of claim 19 , further comprising executable instructions causing a machine to:

receive information from an external database; and

quantify the data on a scale.

27. The article of claim 19 , wherein executable instructions causing a machine to display a search result comprises executable instructions causing a machine to display a ranking of companies.

28. A method of scoring sources of products or services, the method comprising:

displaying, on a display, a user interface depicting a plurality of categories;

receiving in the user interface, weights assigning by a user to the categories, the weights indicating degrees of

importance of the categories to the user, with the categories including at least one user selectable factor, the sources of products or services being associated with the set of categories;

comparing the sources of products or services to a comparative group to determine those sources that belong to the comparative group; and

calculating, in a computer system, total scores for those sources of products or services based on the user defined weights and user selected factors determined for those sources.

29. The method of claim 28 , further comprising

determining, in the computer system, a ranking for each of the sources of products or services belonging to the compartive group based on the total score for each of those sources of products or services; and

displaying, on the display, a result including a ranking of the sources of products or services belonging to the comparative group.

30. The method of claim 28 , further comprising using a market sector as the comparative group.

31. The method of claim 28 , further comprising using an industry as the comparative group.

32. The method of claim 28 , further comprising using a brand category as the comparative group.

33. The method of claim 28 , further comprising using all sources as the comparative group.

34. The method of claim 28 , further comprising using a named peer group as the comparative group.

35. The method of claim 28 , further comprising using a company as the source.

36. The method of claim 28 , wherein the user defined weights and the user selected factors is a numerical ranking.

37. The method of claim 28 , further comprising calculating the user defined weights and user selected factors at a data point level.

38. The method of claim 37 , wherein the user defined weights and the user selected factors is a numerical ranking.

39. An apparatus comprising:

a memory that stores executable instructions for ranking sources of products or services based on a set of user preferences; and

a processor that executes instructions to:

receive from a user, user defined weights for a plurality of categories and selections of user selectable factors belonging to the plurality of categories; and

compare the sources of products or services to a comparative group to determine those sources that belong to the comparative group; by:

calculate, in a computer system, total scores for the sources of products or services belonging to the compartive group based on the user defined weights and the user selected factors;

determine, in the computer system, a ranking for each of the sources of products or services belonging to the compartive group based on the total score for each of those sources of products or services; and

render a result that includes a ranking of the sources of products or services belonging to the comparative group.

40. An article comprising a machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions for ranking sources of products or services based on a set of user preferences, the instructions causing a machine to:

receive from a user, user defined weights for a plurality of categories and selections of user selectable factors belonging to the plurality of categories;

the sources of products or services to a comparative group to determine those sources that belong to the comparative group;

calculate total scores for the sources of products or services based on the user defined weights and the user selected factors;

determine a ranking for each of the sources of products or services belonging to the compartive group based on the total score for each of those sources of products or services; and

display a result including a ranking of the sources of products or services belonging to the comparative group.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2021
From: BARINGS FINANCE LLC
To: INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES INC.; INVESTOR RESPONSIBILITY RESEARCH CENTER, INC.; IDEALSWORK, INC.; ASSET INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BRIGHTSCOPE, INC.; MARKET METRICS, LLC; VISS INTERMEDIATE LLC; SECURITIES CLASS ACTION SERVICES, LLC; ISS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, INC.; CONFLICT SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP, INC.; STRATEGIC INSIGHT HOLDINGS, LLC; STRATEGIC INSIGHT INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS INC.
Reel/Frame 055587/0586 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT AT REEL/FRAME NO. 48512/0188 Recorded Feb 25, 2021
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 055428/0013 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 048512/0188 →
SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 048512/0434 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 44214/0919 Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 048512/0561 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 44214/0868 Recorded Mar 5, 2019
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 048512/0612 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044214/0868 →
SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044214/0919 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS FIRST LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 044293/0434 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS SECOND LIEN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: IDEALSWORK, INC.
Reel/Frame 044297/0001 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 9, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041670/0931 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 9, 2017
From: IDEALSWORK, INC.
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041670/0954 →