IP Library Patent Application 11327416
Patent Application
App. No. 11/327,416

Optimizing an interrogation of a tag population

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/327,416
Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for optimizing an interrogation of a tag population that includes a plurality of tags. The method includes defining a number of time slots allocated to a first read cycle, and selecting a different number of time slots allocated to a second read cycle based on a duration of the first read cycle.

Claims (38)

1 . A method of optimizing an interrogation of a tag population that includes a plurality of tags, comprising:

defining a number of time slots allocated to a first read cycle; and

selecting a different number of time slots allocated to a second read cycle based on a duration of the first read cycle.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

computing a number of tags in the tag population based on the number of time slots allocated to the first read cycle.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

defining a step size for the first read cycle, wherein the step size comprises at least one time slot.

4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

selecting a different step size for the second read cycle based on the duration of the first read cycle.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

measuring interrogation efficiency during a measurement epoch;

determining whether the measured interrogation efficiency is acceptable; and

repeating the defining and selecting steps if the measured interrogation efficiency is not acceptable.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the determining step comprises the step of determining whether the measured interrogation efficiency is greater than a predetermined threshold.

7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the measuring step comprises the step of calculating:

E=T min /T actual , wherein:

E is the interrogation efficiency;

T actual is the actual time it takes to perform an interrogation of a tag population; and

T min is the minimum possible time required to interrogate the same tag population.

8 . A system for optimizing an interrogation of a tag population that includes a plurality of tags, comprising:

means for defining a number of time slots allocated to a first read cycle; and

means for selecting a different number of time slots allocated to a second read cycle based on a duration of the first read cycle.

9 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising:

means for computing a number of tags in the tag population based on the number of time slots allocated to the first read cycle.

10 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising:

means for defining a step size for the first read cycle, wherein the step size comprises at least one time slot.

11 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising:

means for selecting a different step size for the second read cycle based on the duration of the first read cycle.

12 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising:

means for measuring interrogation efficiency during a measurement epoch;

means for determining whether the measured interrogation efficiency is acceptable; and

means for repeating the defining and selecting means if the measured interrogation efficiency is not acceptable.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the means for determining comprises means for determining whether the measured interrogation efficiency is greater than a predetermined threshold.

14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the means for measuring comprises means for calculating:

E=T min /T actual , wherein:

E is the interrogation efficiency;

T actual is the actual time it takes to perform an interrogation of a tag population; and

T min is the minimum possible time required to interrogate the same tag population.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2006
From: ARNESON, MICHAEL R.; BANDY WILLIAM R.
To: MATRICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 017452/0844 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2006
From: MATRICS, INC.
To: SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 017452/0852 →