IP Library Granted Patent US 9,467,950
Granted Patent B2
US 9,467,950 · App. 11/353,403 · Granted Oct 11, 2016

Method for adjusting forward link power control parameters based on forward link quality feedback in wireless network

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,467,950
App. No.
11/353,403
Granted
Oct 11, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system is implemented on a wireless network for adjusting a forward link power control parameter based on forward link feedback. A wireless unit is in communication with several base stations during soft handoff, and provides feedback relating to forward link quality, e.g., forward link pilot signal strength or traffic channel frame error rate. The feedback is compared to a comparison or reference point (such as target frame error rate, or a maximum pilot signal strength in the active set) chosen for gauging the quality or nature of the feedback for power control purposes. Based on this comparison, a power control parameter of one or more of the base stations may be adjusted upwards or downward. The power control parameter may be a forward link reference transmit power level “P ref ” used to control base station power transmission levels in the presence of power control bit errors.

Claims (21)

1. A method for communicating with a wireless unit over a network having a plurality of base stations, the method comprising:

comparing at least one forward link feedback value of each of a plurality of legs in an active set of the wireless unit to at least one forward link feedback parameter, wherein each of the plurality of legs is associated with a respective base station and the plurality of legs define the active set for the wireless unit; and

determining whether to adjust a power control parameter of at least one of the plurality of legs based on the comparison;

wherein the power control parameter of the at least one of the plurality of legs is adjusted independently of adjustments to other legs in the active set.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

setting a transmit power level of the at least one of the plurality of legs based on the power control parameter.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein:

the forward link feedback value for each of the plurality of legs is a pilot signal strength of the leg; and

the method further comprises determining a maximum of the pilot signal strengths, wherein the at least one feedback parameter is the maximum pilot signal strength.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein:

the power control parameter of each of the plurality of legs is a forward link reference transmit power (Pref) level;

the Pref level of any of the plurality of legs is set to a minimum Pref level when the difference between the maximum pilot signal strength and the pilot signal strength of the leg is greater than a first comparison threshold; and

the Pref level of any of the plurality of legs is set at an initial Pref level when the difference between the maximum pilot signal strength and the pilot signal strength of the leg is less than a second comparison threshold.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein:

the at least one forward link feedback value for each of the plurality of legs is a frame error rate and a pilot signal strength of the leg;

the at least one feedback parameter comprises a pilot signal threshold and a target forward link frame error rate;

a power control parameter of each of the plurality of legs is adjusted upwards by a first incremental value when the pilot signal strength of each of the plurality of legs is less than the pilot signal threshold and the frame error rate is greater than the target forward link frame error rate; and

the power control parameter of each of the plurality of legs is adjusted downwards by a second incremental value when the frame error rate is less than the target forward link frame error rate;

wherein the power control parameter of each of the plurality of leg is adjusted independently of adjustments to the other legs in the active set.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the power control parameter is at least one of a forward link reference transmit power level, a forward link minimum transmit power level, and a forward link maximum transmit power level.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of legs are handoff legs.

Assignments (7)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OT WSOU TERRIER HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056990/0081 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2020
From: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 052372/0577 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 20, 2019
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 051061/0753 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: ALCATEL USA MARKETING, INC.; ALCATEL USA SOURCING, INC.; LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.; LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 039817/0634 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 033949/0016 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2013
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 030510/0627 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2006
From: KOSTIC, ANDREW R.; SANDERS, CHARLES ALBERT; SANDERS, SUSAN WU; WEAVER, CARL FRANCIS
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 017574/0277 →