IP Library Granted Patent US 7,907,960
Granted Patent B1
US 7,907,960 · App. 11/361,440 · Granted Mar 15, 2011

Method and apparatus for adjusting feedback of a remote unit

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,907,960
App. No.
11/361,440
Granted
Mar 15, 2011
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and apparatus implementing spatial processing in a remote unit. In general, in one aspect, the present invention provides a remote unit, that includes a plurality of antennas and a spatial processing unit coupled to the plurality of antennas. The remote unit also includes a performance determination unit to determine a performance of the remote unit and a feedback adjustment unit to adjust feedback transmitted from the remote unit to a device, wherein the adjusted feedback accounts for performance associated with the spatial processing unit.

Claims (33)

1. A remote unit, comprising:

a plurality of antennas;

a spatial processing unit coupled to the plurality of antennas; a performance determination unit to determine a performance of the spatial processing unit;

a feedback adjustment unit to adjust feedback transmitted from the remote unit to a device so that the device does not adjust operating parameters in response to a performance gain attributable to the spatial processing unit,

wherein the feedback adjustment unit adjusts feedback to the device to exclude any performance gain attributable to the spatial processing unit.

2. The remote unit of claim 1 , wherein: the feedback adjustment unit determines when to adjust feedback to the device not based on any performance gain attributable to the spatial processing unit but based on whether the remote unit is communicating with a device whose response to feedback indicating gain from spatial processing by the remote unit adversely affects the remote unit.

3. The remote unit of claim 1 , wherein:

the feedback adjustment unit determines whether to include any performance gain attributable to the spatial processing unit in the feedback to the device, the determination being based on whether the remote unit is communicating with a base station whose response to feedback including any gain from spatial processing by the remote unit benefits the remote unit.

4. The remote unit of claim 1 , wherein:

the remote unit operates in a non-spatial processing mode; and

the performance determination unit determines a performance level of the remote unit while the remote unit is operating in the non-spatial processing mode.

5. The remote unit of claim 1 , wherein:

the spatial processing unit calculates and provides to the performance determination unit a performance gain provided by spatial processing; and

the performance determination unit measures a performance level of the remote unit when operating in a spatial processing mode and excludes the performance gain from the measured performance level.

6. The remote unit of claim 1 , wherein the remote unit supports one or more types of requested service, and wherein the feedback adjustment unit includes logic for specifying when to adjust feedback depending on the type of requested service.

7. The remote unit of claim 1 , further comprising:

a user interface coupled to the feedback adjustment unit for receiving user input for adjusting feedback.

8. The remote unit of claim 7 , wherein user input includes selecting from a group consisting of:

always adjust feedback;

never adjust feedback; and

selectively adjust feedback based on control parameters.

9. The remote unit of claim 1 , wherein a subset of the plurality of antennas have different characteristics relative to one another.

10. The remote unit of claim 9 , wherein the different characteristics are caused by antennas in the subset being physically separated relative to each other.

11. The remote unit of claim 9 , wherein the different antenna characteristics is caused by each of the subset having different orientations.

12. The remote unit of claim 11 , wherein the different characteristics are caused by each of the antennas of the subset having substantially orthogonal orientations relative to one another.

13. The remote unit of claim 9 , wherein the different characteristics are caused by each of the antennas of the subset having a different material composition.

14. The remote unit of claim 9 , wherein the different characteristics are caused by each of the antennas of the subset having different shapes.

15. A handset comprising:

a plurality of antennas;

a spatial processing unit coupled to the plurality of antennas;

a performance determination unit to estimate a performance benefit of the spatial processing unit; and

a feedback adjustment unit to compute an adjusted feedback to be transmitted from the handset to a base station,

wherein the adjusted feedback excludes the estimated performance benefit of the spatial processing unit.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2008
From: ARRAYCOMM LLC
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 021794/0107 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 31, 2006
From: ARRAYCOMM, INC.
To: ARRAYCOMM LLC.
Reel/Frame 017420/0658 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2006
From: BARRATT, CRAIG H; PARISH, DAVID M; SIFFERMAN, STEPHEN J
To: ARRAYCOMM, INC.
Reel/Frame 017622/0042 →