System and method of evaluating crop management

1. A plant stand management evaluator system in communication with a remote user terminal via a communications network, the system comprising:

a computer including a processor in communication with a memory, the memory including a plurality of computer program code instructions for execution by the processor, the plurality of computer program code instructions including the steps of:

receiving input data from a user, the input data representative of at least parameter 1) and parameter 2) of management parameters in the group consisting of:

1) a total plant population in a selected sampling sub-area,

2) a spacing of an individual plant relative to a nearest adjacent plant in the sampling sub-area, the majority of plants spaced-apart for optimal yield potential via a benchmark spacing for each plant in the sampling sub-area, a minority of plants spaced too closely relative to the benchmark spacing within the sampling sub-area such that two or more too closely spaced plants within the sampling sub-area result in a 50 percent or greater loss in yield potential per too closely spaced plant, and

3) a maturity of the individual plant relative to the nearest adjacent plant in the sampling sub-area;

calculating a predicted net effective plant population according to the expression:

NEPP=[( TP i −Σ( n si *s i +n mi *m i ))/ TP i ]*(BPP)

wherein:

NEPP is the predicted net effective plant population; (i) represents an identifier of the sampling sub-area, where the (TP i ) represents the total number of plants in the sampling sub-area, (n si ) represents a number of plants in sampling having a spacing relative to the nearest neighboring plant that differs from the benchmark spacing, (s i ) represents a predicted deduction factor in yield dependent on spacing, (n mi ) represents number of plants in the sampling sub-area within a predetermined maturity below a benchmark maturity, (m i ) represents a predicted deduction factor in yield dependent on maturity; and BPP is a benchmark plant population; and

generating a display indicative of the predicted net effective plant population to the user.

2. The system as recited in claim 1 , the plurality of computer program code instructions further including the steps of:

calculating a predicted yield of the plant population equal to the predicted net effective plant population multiplied by a benchmark yield per plant; and

displaying the predicted yield to the user.

3. The system as recited in claim 2 , the plurality of computer program code instructions further including the steps of:

calculating a predicted yield loss dependent on a difference between the predicted yield of the plant population and a benchmark yield of the plant population, the benchmark yield of the plant population equal to the benchmark plant population multiplied by the benchmark yield per plant; and

displaying the predicted yield loss to the user.

4. The system as recited in claim 3 , the plurality of computer program code instructions further including the steps of:

receiving a crop market price data per yield; and

calculating a predicted cost in yield loss equal to the predicted yield loss multiplied by the crop market price data per yield.

5. The system as recited in claim 4 , the plurality of computer program code instructions further including the step of:

identifying a recommendation to reduce the predicted yield loss.

6. The system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the identifying a recommendation step includes:

identifying differences between the input data for benchmark maturity and a benchmark maturity of an individual plant relative to neighboring plants;

calculating a predicted increase in profit dependent on a difference between a price of a benchmark yield dependent on the benchmark maturity and the price of the predicted yield; and

displaying the increase in profit to the user.

7. The system as recited in claim 5 , wherein the identifying a recommendation step includes:

identifying differences between the spacing of the individual plants and a benchmark spacing for the individual plant;

calculating a predicted profit based on a difference in the price of the predicted yield and a price of the benchmark yield at the benchmark spacing; and

displaying the recommendation including the benchmark spacing and the predicted profit to the user.

8. The system as recited in claim 4 , the plurality of computer program code instructions further including the step of calculating a return on investment for a planting equipment, including:

receiving a input data representative of at least one of a historical spacing of individual plants relative to the benchmark spacing using the planting equipment, and a historical maturity of individual plants relative to the benchmark maturity using the planting equipment;

receiving a capital cost of the planting equipment;

calculating a net effective plant population using the mathematical model and the input data for at least one of the historical spacing and the historical maturity;

calculating a predicted yield of the plant population and a predicted increase in profit using the predicted net effective plant population;

calculating the predicted return on investment dependent on the capital cost of the planting equipment and the predicted increase in profit using the planting equipment; and

displaying the predicted return in investment to the grower.

9. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the maturity deduction factor (m i ) for the number of plants that are one to two leaves behind a benchmark number of leaves is (−0.5), and wherein the deduction factor (m i ) for a number of plants that are three or more leaves behind the benchmark number of leaves is (−1).

10. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the spacing deduction factor (s i ) for two too closely spaced plants is (−0.5), and wherein the spacing deduction factor (s i ) for three or more too closely spaced plants is (−0.67).