IP Library Granted Patent US 7,502,812
Granted Patent B2
US 7,502,812 · App. 11/423,030 · Granted Mar 10, 2009

Electronic ink processing

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,502,812
App. No.
11/423,030
Granted
Mar 10, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of reconciling a first data structure with a second data structure that is a subsequently modified version of the first data structure. Initially, each node in the first data structure for which a change has been made to a corresponding node in the second data structure is accessed. For each accessed node, a determination is made as to whether the change made to the corresponding node in the second data structure creates a collision with the first data structure. If the change made to the corresponding node in the second data structure does not create a collision with the first data structure, then the change is made to the accessed node in the first data structure.

Claims (22)

1. A method of reconciling results of ink analysis of a document with a current version of the document, the method comprising:

creating document independent context object from a current context object of the document;

creating a copy of the document independent context object;

modifying the copy of the document independent context object in a document analysis process to include results of ink analysis of the document independent context object;

receiving a second version of the current context object;

for every ink node in the document independent context object, when there is a corresponding node in the current context object, then adding the node to a hash table which maps unique node identifiers in the document independent context object to node references in the current context object;

for each node in the document independent context object, determining if the corresponding node in the second version of the current context object differs from the each node; and

for each node in the document independent context object, when a node in the document independent context object differs from the corresponding node in the second version of the current context object, adding the node to a list of nodes for which changes will not be propagated.

2. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

for each node in the document independent context object, looking up a corresponding node in the modified copy of the document independent context object and looking up a corresponding node in the second version of the current context object;

determining if the corresponding node is deleted from the modified copy of the document independent context object; and

when the corresponding node is deleted from the modified copy of the document independent context object, adding the corresponding node to the list of nodes for which changes will not be propagated.

3. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

analyzing each node in the copy of the document independent context object; and

when the analyzed node is not in the list of nodes for which changes will not be propagated, propagating changes in the analyzed node from a corresponding node in the copy of the document independent context object to the corresponding node in the second version of the current context object.

4. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

for each node in the document independent context object, determining if a corresponding node has been deleted from the modified copy of the document independent context object;

for each node in the document independent context object,

when the corresponding node in the second version of the current context object does not differ, and

when the corresponding node has been deleted from the modified copy of the document independent context object, then

adding the identifying nodes to a list of deleted nodes; and

deleting the nodes in the list of deleted nodes after all changes have been propagated to the second version of the current context object.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2014
From: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
To: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 034542/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 27, 2008
From: WAKEAM, JAMIE; DUNCAN, RICHARD; SUTANTO, HERRY; RAGHUPATHY, SASHI; KANNAPEL, TIMOTHY H.; SZILAGYI, ZOLTAN
To: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020713/0048 →