IP Library Granted Patent US 7,526,731
Granted Patent B2
US 7,526,731 · App. 11/448,049 · Granted Apr 28, 2009

Method for integrating user models to interface design

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,526,731
App. No.
11/448,049
Granted
Apr 28, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method that incorporates a detailed, precise procedure of designing a user interface by utilizing agent behavioral models. This method applies quantitative and qualitative agent behavioral models derived through the Categorize Describe-Model (CDM) methodology to the iterative design stage of interface development. The method includes: (1) categorizing at least two users; (2) validating targeted user behaviors and preferences; (3) capturing emergent behaviors and preferences; (4) tracking design requirements and implementations; (5) accommodating diversity in performance and preference during interactive testing; and (6) customizing a user interface design to each of the at least two users.

Claims (28)

1. A method for designing a customized user interface, comprising: categorizing a user population into at least two groups, describing the categorized groups, and modeling the described groups using qualitative and quantitative models, the categorizing, describing and modeling being based upon Categorize-Describe-Model (CDM) methodology; and

applying the models to interface design.

2. The method of claim 1 , in which applying the models further comprises evaluating design ideas and/or design requirements with respect to each CDM group.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising describing how a group's characteristics have been accommodated.

4. The method of claim 3 , in which the accommodation describing further comprises rating based upon subjective opinions.

5. The method of claim 4 , in which the rating further comprises evaluating how an individual fits in with design requirements.

6. The method of claim 4 , in which the rating further comprises evaluating how an individual fits in with overall workflow.

7. The method of claim 4 , in which the rating further comprises evaluating how an individual fits in across screen navigation.

8. The method of claim 2 , further comprising describing how a group's characteristics have not been addressed.

9. The method of claim 8 , in which describing how a group's characteristics have not been addressed further comprises rating with YES/NO coding.

10. The method of claim 1 , in which applying the models further comprises analyzing screen flow.

11. The method of claim 10 , in which the screen flow analysis further comprises determining a prototypical screen flow.

12. A method for designing a customized user interface, comprising:

categorizing a user population into at least two groups, describing the categorized groups, and modeling the described groups using qualitative and quantitative models, the categorizing, describing and modeling being based upon Categorize-Describe-Model (CDM) methodology; and

applying the models to interface design by customizing the user interface based on behavioral characteristics of the user groups.

13. A method for designing a customized user interface, comprising:

categorizing a user population into at least two groups, describing the categorized groups, and modeling the described groups using qualitative and quantitative models, the categorizing, describing and modeling being based upon Categorize-Describe-Model (CDM) methodology;

applying the models to interface design by analyzing screen flow including a prototypical screen flow; and

creating the quantitative models based upon the screen flow analysis.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising indicating common interface screens visited during a customer/representative negotiation for at least one call type.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising determining the at least one call type based upon customer request consistency.

16. The method of claim 13 , in which applying the models further comprises evaluating design ideas and/or design requirements with respect to each CDM group.

17. The method of claim 13 , further comprising describing how a group's characteristics have not been addressed.

18. The method of claim 17 , in which describing how a group's characteristics have not been addressed further comprises rating based upon subjective opinions.

19. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

validating targeted user behaviors and user preferences of the model; and

tracking design requirements for the validated user behaviors and user preferences.

20. The method of claim 13 , further comprising iteratively testing the design.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF ADDRESS Recorded Dec 17, 2015
From: RAKUTEN, INC.
To: RAKUTEN, INC.
Reel/Frame 037751/0006 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2014
From: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
To: RAKUTEN, INC.
Reel/Frame 033451/0455 →