IP Library Patent Application 11452169
Patent Application
App. No. 11/452,169

Constrained surface evolutions for prostate and bladder segmentation in CT images

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/452,169
Abstract

A Bayesian formulation for coupled surface evolutions in level set methods and application to the segmentation of the prostate and the bladder in CT images are disclosed. A Bayesian framework imposing a shape constraint on the prostate is also disclosed, while coupling its shape extraction with that of the bladder. Constraining the segmentation process improves the extraction of both organs' shapes.

Claims (328)

1 . A method for segmenting a first structure and a second structure from image data, comprising:

forming an energy function E=f(E data , E coupling ) wherein E data represents a possible segmentation based on the first structure and the second structure and E coupling represents a measure of overlap between the first structure and the second structure; and

minimizing the energy function.

2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein E=E data +E coupling .

3 . The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein E data and E coupling are logarithmic expressions.

4 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the terms E data and E coupling depend on the probability of a level set function of the first structure and of the second structure.

5 . The method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein E coupling depends on a penalty α.

6 . The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the term E data is expressed as:

E

data

(

ϕ

1

,

ϕ

2

)

=

-

Ω

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

1

,

x

)

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

2

,

x

)

)

log

p

1

(

I

(

x

)

)

x

-

Ω

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

2

,

x

)

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

1

,

x

)

)

log

p

2

(

I

(

x

)

)

x

-

Ω

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

2

,

x

)

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

1

,

x

)

)

log

p

b

(

I

(

x

)

)

x

and the term E coupling is expressed as:

E coupling (φ 1 ,φ 2 )=α∫ Ω H ε (φ 1,x ) H ε (φ 2,x ) dx.

7 . The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein a third term E shape is added which expresses a constraint of learned prior shapes.

8 . The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the term E shape can be expressed as E shape =−log p(φ|{φ 1 , . . . , φ N }.

9 . The method as claimed in claim 5 , where α is user defined.

10 . The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the first structure is a prostate and the second structure is a bladder.

11 . A system that can segment a first structure and a second structure from image data, comprising:

a processor;

application software operable on the processor to:

form an energy function E=f(E data , E coupling ) wherein E data represents a possible segmentation based on the first structure and the second structure and E coupling represents a measure of overlap between the first structure and the second structure; and

minimize the energy function.

12 . The system as claimed in claim 11 , wherein E=E data +E coupling .

13 . The system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein. E data and E coupling are logarithmic expressions.

14 . The system as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the terms E data and E coupling depend on the probability of a level set function of the first structure and of the second structure.

15 . The system as claimed in claim 14 , wherein E coupling depends on a penalty α.

16 . The system as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the term E data , is expressed as:

E

data

(

ϕ

1

,

ϕ

2

)

=

-

Ω

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

1

,

x

)

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

2

,

x

)

)

log

p

1

(

I

(

x

)

)

x

-

Ω

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

2

,

x

)

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

1

,

x

)

)

log

p

2

(

I

(

x

)

)

x

-

Ω

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

2

,

x

)

(

1

-

H

ɛ

(

ϕ

1

,

x

)

)

log

p

b

(

I

(

x

)

)

x

and the term E coupling is expressed as:

E coupling (φ 1 ,φ 2 )=α∫ Ω H ε (φ 1,x ) H ε (φ 2,x ) dx.

17 . The system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein a third term E shape is added which expresses a constraint of learned prior shapes.

18 . The system as claimed in claim 17 , wherein the term E shape can be expressed as E shape =−log p(φ|{φ 1 , . . . , φ N }.

19 . The system as claimed in claim 15 , where α is user defined.

20 . The system as claimed in claim 11 wherein the first structure is a prostate and the second structure is a bladder.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2007
From: SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH, INC.
To: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 019309/0669 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2006
From: DIALLO, MAMADOU; KHAMENE, ALI; ROUSSON, MIKAEL
To: SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH, INC.
Reel/Frame 018271/0936 →