IP Library Granted Patent US 7,778,482
Granted Patent B2
US 7,778,482 · App. 11/489,091 · Granted Aug 17, 2010

Method and system for reducing mosquito noise in a digital image

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,778,482
App. No.
11/489,091
Granted
Aug 17, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system is provided for reducing mosquito noise in a digital image. The method and system receives an input luminance value for a first pixel in the digital image, and determines whether the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object appearing in the digital image, based on a comparison of the variation between the input luminance value for the first pixel and luminance values of a first plurality of neighboring pixels. If the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object, the method performs an average filtering of the input luminance value for the first pixel, based on the luminance values of a second plurality of neighboring pixels, to provide a filtered luminance value for the first pixel.

Claims (459)

1. A method for reducing mosquito noise in a digital image, comprising:

receiving an input luminance value for a first pixel in the digital image;

determining whether the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object appearing in the digital image, based on a comparison of the variation between the input luminance value for the first pixel and luminance values of a first plurality of neighboring pixels; and

if the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object, performing an average filtering of the input luminance value for the first pixel, based on the luminance values of a second plurality of neighboring pixels different from the first plurality of neighboring pixels, to provide a filtered luminance value for the first pixel.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the method determines whether the pixel is in relative close proximity to an object by calculating a maximum variation between the luminance value of the first pixel and the luminance values of the first plurality of neighboring pixels.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the first plurality of neighboring pixels reside within an M×N window surrounding the pixel.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the first plurality of neighboring pixels reside within an 9×14 window surrounding the pixel.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

calculating a blending value, based on a comparison of the variation between the luminance value for the first pixel and luminance values of the first plurality of neighboring pixels; and

determining an output luminance by blending the filtered luminance value for the first pixel and the input luminance value of the first pixel, based on the blending value.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the blending value is proportional to a maximum variation between the luminance value of the first pixel and the luminance values of the first plurality of neighboring pixels.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the average filtering is an adaptive average filtering.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the second plurality of neighboring pixels reside within a 3×3 window surrounding the first pixel.

9. A method for reducing mosquito noise in a digital image, comprising:

selecting a first pixel in the digital image;

calculating a maximum variation between the luminance value of the first pixel and the luminance values of a first plurality of neighboring pixels;

determining whether the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object appearing in the digital image, by comparing the maximum variation to a first threshold value; and

if the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object, performing adaptive average filtering of the luminance value for the first pixel, based on the luminance values of a second plurality of neighboring pixels different from the first plurality of neighboring pixels, to provide a filtered luminance value for the first pixel.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

comparing the maximum variation to a second threshold value to generate a blending value; and

determining an output luminance by blending the filtered luminance value for the first pixel and the input luminance value of the first pixel, based on the blending value.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the output luminance is determined according to the following equation:

Y ″( i,j )= Y ′( i,j )×alpha_obj( i,j )+ Y ( i,j ) (1−alpha_obj( i,j ))

where V′(i,j) is the output luminance for the first pixel, Y′(ij) is the filtered luminance value, Y(i,j) is the input luminance value and alpha_obj(ij) is the blending value.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein alpha_obj(i,j) is equal to “0” when the maximum variance is less than or equal to the first threshold value, “1” when the maximum variance is greater than or equal to the second threshold value, and otherwise is equal to a value between 0 and 1 that is proportional to the maximum variance.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the first plurality of neighboring pixels reside within an M×N window surrounding the pixel.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein Y′(ij) is calculated according to the following equations:

Y

*

(

i

,

j

)

=

1

W

s

=

n

-

1

2

n

-

1

2

t

=

m

-

1

2

m

-

1

2

c

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

·

α

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

·

Y

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

W

=

s

=

n

-

1

2

n

-

1

2

t

=

m

-

1

2

m

-

1

2

c

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

α

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

=

{

1

,

abs

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

<

_

REG_TH

1

0

,

abs

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

>

_

REG_TH

2

REG_TH

2

-

abs

(

Y

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

-

Y

(

i

,

j

)

)

REG_TH

2

-

REG_TH

1

,

,

others

where c(i,j) is a predetermined coefficient of the second plurality of neighboring pixels, Y(i,j) is the input luminance of pixel (i,j), a (i,j) is a correlation between the first pixel and the second plurality of neighboring pixels, REG_TH 1 and REGTH 2 are predetermined threshold values, and m×n is a filter window size corresponding to the second plurality of neighboring pixels.

15. A system for reducing mosquito noise in a digital image, comprising:

an object detection module that receives an input luminance value for a first pixel in the digital image and determines whether the first pixel is in relative close proximity to an object appearing in the digital image, based on a comparison of the variation between the input luminance value for the first pixel and luminance values of a first plurality of neighboring pixels; and

a filtering module that performs an average filtering of the input luminance value for the first pixel, based on the luminance values of a second plurality of neighboring pixels different from the first plurality of neighboring pixels, to provide a filtered luminance value for the first pixel if the first pixel is determined to be in relative close proximity to an object.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the object detection module determines whether the pixel is in relative close proximity to an object by calculating a maximum variation between the luminance value of the first pixel and the luminance values of the first plurality of neighboring pixels.

17. The system of claim 16 wherein the first plurality of neighboring pixels reside within an M×N window surrounding the pixel.

18. The system of claim 15 wherein the object detection module calculates a blending value, based on a comparison of the variation between the luminance value for the first pixel and luminance values of the first plurality of neighboring pixels, and wherein the system further comprising

circuitry for determining an output luminance by blending the filtered luminance value for the first pixel and the input luminance value of the first pixel, based on the blending value.

19. The system of claim 18 wherein the output luminance is determined using the following equation:

Y ″( i,j )= Y ′( i,j )×alpha_obj( i,j )+ Y ( i,j ) (1−alpha_obj( i,j ))

where Y″(i,j) is the output luminance for the first pixel, Y′(ij) is the filtered luminance value, Y(i,j) is the input luminance value and alphaobj(ij) is the blending value.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein alpha_obj(i,j) is equal to “0” when the maximum variance is less than or equal to the first threshold value, “1” when the maximum variance is greater than or equal to the second threshold value, and otherwise is equal to a value between 0 and 1 that is proportional to the maximum variance.

21. The system of claim 20 wherein Y′(iJ) is calculated according to the following equations:

Y

*

(

i

,

j

)

=

1

W

s

=

n

-

1

2

n

-

1

2

t

=

m

-

1

2

m

-

1

2

c

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

·

α

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

·

Y

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

W

=

s

=

n

-

1

2

n

-

1

2

t

=

m

-

1

2

m

-

1

2

c

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

α

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

=

{

1

,

abs

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

<

_

REG_TH

1

0

,

abs

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

>

_

REG_TH

2

REG_TH

2

-

abs

(

Y

(

i

+

s

,

j

+

t

)

-

Y

(

i

,

j

)

)

REG_TH

2

-

REG_TH

1

,

,

others

where c(i,j) is a predetermined coefficient of the second plurality of neighboring pixels, Y(i,j) is the input luminance of pixel (i j), a (i,j) is a correlation between the first pixel and the second plurality of neighboring pixels, REGTH 1 and REGTH 2 are predetermined threshold values, and m×n is a filter window size corresponding to the second plurality of neighboring pixels.

22. The system of claim 15 wherein the first plurality of neighboring pixels is larger than the second plurality of plurality of neighboring pixels.

23. The system of claim 15 wherein the object detection module and filtering module are operatively disposed within a digital television chip.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2021
From: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
To: MAXLINEAR, INC.; EXAR CORPORATION; MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 056656/0204 →
SUCCESSION OF AGENCY (REEL 042453 / FRAME 0001) Recorded Jul 1, 2020
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MUFG UNION BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053115/0842 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2018
From: MAXLINEAR INC; ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS LLC
To: DYNAMIC DATA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 047128/0295 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 12, 2017
From: MAXLINEAR, INC.; ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC (F/K/A ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.); EXAR CORPORATION
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 042453/0001 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 19, 2015
From: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; EXCALIBUR SUBSIDIARY, LLC; ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
To: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 035717/0628 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 18, 2015
From: EXCALIBUR ACQUISITION CORPORATION; ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 035706/0267 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2012
From: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.; TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS (FAR EAST) LTD.
To: ENTROPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028153/0530 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2007
From: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
To: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS (FAR EAST) LTD.
Reel/Frame 018895/0736 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2006
From: YOKOYAMA, MITSUHIRO; ORIGASA, HIDEKI; MATSUZAKI, MASUNORI; MATSUZAWA, YUJI; SAITO, YASUSHI
To: MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,LTD.
Reel/Frame 018546/0733 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 19, 2006
From: CHEN, CHUN-WEI; JIANG, JIANDE; ZHANG, JUN; LUI, ZHENG
To: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 018118/0786 →