Tracing routing differences
View Patent ↗A routing validation method and system identifies routers that are likely to be the cause of differences in forwarding tables associated with two versions of a network. Each destination sub-network prefix is processed to identify all the routers that exhibit differences in their forwarding table for this prefix. Each router exhibiting a difference is assessed to determine whether the difference may have been propagated to this router from another router. If the difference could not have been propagated from another router, this router is identified as a potential source of the observed difference. By eliminating routers that could have received the effects of the differences from another router, the task of identifying the root cause of the observed differences is substantially reduced in complexity.
1. A method embodied on a network analysis system for identifying potential sources of differences between a first set of forwarding tables and a second set of forwarding tables, comprising:
identifying, by the network analysis system, a prefix in the first set of forwarding tables,
identifying, by the network analysis system, a first router that indicates a difference between a first entry in the first set of forwarding tables and a second entry in the second set of forwarding tables for the prefix,
identifying, by the network analysis system, a next-hop router based on the first entry,
identifying, by the network analysis system, the first router as a potential source of the difference between the first entry and the second entry, based on whether the next-hop router indicates a difference between entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix.
2. The method of claim 1 , including identifying each other router that exhibits a difference between entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix, and identifying each other router as a potential source of the difference between the first entry and the second entry, based on whether a corresponding next-hop router indicates a difference between entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix.
3. The method of claim 2 , including repeating the method of claim 2 for each other prefix in the first set of forwarding tables.
4. The method of claim 1 , including repeating the method of claim 1 for each other prefix in the first set of forwarding tables.
5. The method of claim 1 , including collecting the first set of forwarding tables from a plurality of routers forming a first state of a network, and collecting the second set of forwarding tables from a plurality of routers forming a second state of a network.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first and second sets of forwarding tables corresponds to a set of forwarding tables used to model performance of a network.
7. A system comprising:
a database, and
a processing system that is configured to:
access a first set of forwarding tables and a second set of forwarding tables from the database,
identify differences in entries between the first and second sets of forwarding tables, and
identify potential sources of the differences in the entries, based on a determination of whether next-hop routers identified in the entries exhibit differences in entries between the first and second sets of forwarding tables.
8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the processing system is further configured to facilitate providing at least one of the first and second set of forwarding tables to the database, from a plurality of routers forming a network.
9. The system of claim 8 , wherein each router of the plurality of routers is configured to autonomously transmit its forwarding table to the processing system.
10. The system of claim 7 , wherein at least one of the first and second sets of forwarding tables corresponds to a set of forwarding tables used to model performance of a network.
11. A computer program that is stored on a computer-readable medium and configured to cause a processing system to distinguish routers that are potential sources of routing discrepancies by effecting the following:
identify a plurality of routers within a first and second set of forwarding tables as non-source routers; and
for each prefix of a plurality of prefixes within the first set of forwarding tables:
identifying non-source routers that exhibit different entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix; and
for each non-source router that exhibits different entries:
identify a next hop router from the entry in the first set,
determine whether the next hop router exhibits different entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix, and
if the next hop router does not exhibit different entries, identify the non-source router as one of a plurality of source routers.
12. The computer program of claim 11 , which further causes the processing system to identify a non-source router as one of the plurality of source routers, if the non-source router is directly coupled to a sub-network corresponding to the prefix and exhibits different entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix.
13. The computer program of claim 11 , which further causes the processing system to identify a non-source router as one of the plurality of source routers, if the non-source router is a sole router that exhibits different entries in the first and second sets of forwarding tables for the prefix.
14. The computer program of claim 11 , which further causes the processing system to remove each non-source router that is identified as a source router from the plurality of non-source routers.