IP Library Granted Patent US 7,738,729
Granted Patent B2
US 7,738,729 · App. 11/498,114 · Granted Jun 15, 2010

Systems and methods for reducing an artifact within an image

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,738,729
App. No.
11/498,114
Granted
Jun 15, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for reducing an artifact within an image of a substance is described. The method includes generating the image of the substance, and constraining a measured linear attenuation coefficient of a pixel of the image based on at least one of a measured diffraction profile, a measured effective atomic number, and a measured packing fraction of the substance.

Claims (110)

1. A method for reducing an artifact within an image of a substance, said method comprising:

generating the image of the substance;

generating at least one of a measured diffraction profile, a measured effective atomic number, and a measured packing fraction of the substance;

determining a pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to at least one of a pre-stored diffraction profile, a pre-stored effective atomic number, and a pre-stored packing fraction; and

changing a measured linear attenuation coefficient of a pixel of the image to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient.

2. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured diffraction profile; and

determining a pre-stored diffraction profile that is closest to the measured diffraction profile.

3. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured effective atomic number; and

determining a pre-stored effective atomic number that is closest to the measured effective atomic number of the substance.

4. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured packing fraction; and

determining a pre-stored packing fraction that is closest to the measured packing fraction of the substance.

5. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured diffraction profile;

determining a pre-stored diffraction profile that is closest to the measured diffraction profile; and

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored diffraction profile upon determining the pre-stored diffraction profile closest to the measured diffraction profile.

6. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured effective atomic number;

determining a pre-stored effective atomic number that is closest to the measured effective atomic number of the substance; and

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored effective atomic number upon determining the pre-stored effective atomic number closest to the measured effective atomic number.

7. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured packing fraction;

determining a pre-stored packing fraction that is closest to the measured packing fraction of the substance; and

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored packing fraction upon determining the pre-stored effective atomic number closest to the measured packing fraction.

8. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured diffraction profile;

determining a pre-stored diffraction profile that is closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored diffraction profile upon determining the pre-stored diffraction profile closest to the measured diffraction profile; and

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient.

9. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured effective atomic number;

determining a pre-stored effective atomic number that is closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored effective atomic number upon determining the pre-stored effective atomic number closest to the measured effective atomic number; and

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient.

10. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured packing fraction;

determining a pre-stored packing fraction that is closest to the measured packing fraction;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored packing fraction upon determining the pre-stored packing fraction closest to the measured packing fraction; and

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient.

11. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured diffraction profile;

determining a pre-stored diffraction profile that is closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored diffraction profile upon determining the pre-stored diffraction profile closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient; and

changing the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel.

12. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured effective atomic number;

determining a pre-stored effective atomic number that is closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored effective atomic number upon determining the pre-stored effective atomic number closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient; and

changing the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel.

13. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured packing fraction;

determining a pre-stored packing fraction that is closest to the measured packing fraction;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored packing fraction upon determining the pre-stored packing fraction closest to the measured packing fraction;

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient; and

changing the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel.

14. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured diffraction profile;

determining the pre-stored diffraction profile that is closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored diffraction profile upon determining the pre-stored diffraction profile closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient;

changing the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel; and

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel.

15. A method in accordance with claim 1 further comprising:

generating the measured diffraction profile;

determining a pre-stored diffraction profile that is closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored diffraction profile upon determining the pre-stored diffraction profile closest to the measured diffraction profile;

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient;

changing the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel;

determining whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel; and

replacing the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel with zero upon determining that the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero.

16. A processor for reducing an artifact within an image of a substance, said processor configured to:

generate the image of the substance;

generate at least one of a measured diffraction profile, a measured effective atomic number, and a measured packing fraction of the substance;

determine a pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to at least one of a pre-stored diffraction profile, a pre-stored effective atomic number, and a pre-stored packing fraction; and

change a measured linear attenuation coefficient of a pixel of the image to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient.

17. A processor in accordance with claim 16 further configured to:

generate the measured effective atomic number;

determine a pre-stored effective atomic number that is closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determine a pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored effective atomic number upon determining the pre-stored effective atomic number closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determine whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient;

change the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel; and

determine whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel.

18. A processor in accordance with claim 16 further configured to:

generate the measured effective atomic number;

determine a pre-stored effective atomic number that is closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determine a pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored effective atomic number upon determining the pre-stored effective atomic number closest to the measured effective atomic number;

determine whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient;

change the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel;

determine whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel; and

replace the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel with zero upon determining that the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero.

19. An imaging system for reducing an artifact within an image of a substance, said imaging system comprising:

an energy source configured to generate energy;

a scatter detector configured to detect a portion of the energy upon passage of the energy through the substance; and

a processor configured to:

generate the image of the substance;

generate at least one of a measured diffraction profile, a measured effective atomic number, and a measured packing fraction of the substance;

determine a pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to at least one of a pre-stored diffraction profile, a are-stored effective atomic number, and a pre-stored packing fraction; and

change a measured linear attenuation coefficient of a pixel of the image to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient.

20. An imaging system in accordance with claim 19 , wherein said processor further configured to:

generate the measured packing fraction;

determine a pre-stored packing fraction that is closest to the measured packing fraction;

determine a pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient corresponding to the pre-stored packing fraction upon determining the pre-stored packing fraction closest to the measured packing fraction;

determine whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is equal to the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient;

change the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel to match the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is not equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel;

determine whether the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero upon determining that the pre-stored linear attenuation coefficient is equal to the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel; and

replace the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel with zero upon determining that the measured linear attenuation coefficient of the pixel is less than zero.

Assignments (8)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2025
From: SMITHS DETECTION INC.
To: SMITHS DETECTION GERMANY GMBH
Reel/Frame 073508/0846 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 30, 2025
From: SMITHS DETECTION, LLC
To: SMITHS DETECTION INC.
Reel/Frame 073406/0059 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 30, 2025
From: MORPHO DETECTION, LLC
To: SMITHS DETECTION, LLC
Reel/Frame 073411/0553 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE PURPOSE OF THE CORRECTION IS TO ADD THE CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION PAGE TO THE ORIGINALLY FILED CHANGE OF NAME DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 032122 FRAME 67. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Mar 19, 2014
From: MORPHO DETECTION, INC.
To: MORPHO DETECTION, LLC
Reel/Frame 032470/0682 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 24, 2014
From: MORPHO DETECTION, INC.
To: MORPHO DETECTION, LLC
Reel/Frame 032122/0067 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2010
From: GE SECURITY, INC.
To: MORPHO DETECTION, INC.
Reel/Frame 024281/0243 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 16, 2009
From: HARDING, GEOFFREY
To: GE SECURITY, INC.
Reel/Frame 022401/0840 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2007
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: GE HOMELAND PROTECTION, INC.
Reel/Frame 019304/0798 →