Analyzing security compliance within a network
View Patent ↗A security policy database identifies the intended security policies within a network, a traffic generator provides test traffic that is configured to test each defined security policy, and a simulator simulates the propagation of this traffic on a model of the network. The model of the network includes the configuration data associated with each device, and thus, if devices are properly configured to enforce the intended security policies, the success/failure of the simulated test traffic will conform to the intended permit/deny policy of each connection. Differences between the simulated message propagation and the intended security policies are reported to the user, and diagnostic tools are provided to facilitate identification of the device configuration data that accounts for the observed difference. Additionally, if a network's current security policy is unknown, test traffic is generated to reveal the actual policy in effect, to construct a baseline intended security policy.
1. A method comprising:
identifying, on a security validation system, one or more pairs of zones of a network, each element of a first zone of each pair having a common security policy relative to each element of a second zone of the pair,
selecting, by the security validation system, at least one pair of the pairs of zones,
generating, by the security validation system, one or more messages for transmission between a source zone and a destination zone of the at least one pair, and
determining, by the security validation system, the security policy corresponding to the at least one pair of zones based on propagation of the one or more messages from the source zone toward the destination zone.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the security policy includes simulating the propagation of the one or more messages based on a model of the network.
3. The method of claim 2 , including determining whether the security policy corresponding to the at least one pair of zones is consistent with an expected security policy associated with the at least one pair, based on the propagation of the one or more messages.
4. The method of claim 3 , including facilitating diagnosis of violations of the expected security policy.
5. The method of claim 4 , including:
based on the propagation, identifying one of:
a path corresponding to the propagation of at least one of the one or more messages between the source and destination zones, and
one or more network devices that blocked the propagation of the at least one message to the destination zone.
6. The method of claim 1 , including determining whether the security policy corresponding to the at least one pair of zones based on the propagation of the one or more messages between the zones is consistent with an expected security policy for the at least one pair of zones.
7. The method of claim 6 , including facilitating diagnosis of violations of the expected security policy.
8. The method of claim 1 , including identifying a path corresponding to the propagation of at least one of the one or more messages between the source and destination zones.
9. The method of claim 1 , including identifying one or more network devices that blocked the propagation of the at least one message to the destination zone.
10. The method of claim 1 , including displaying information regarding the security policy corresponding to the at least one pair of zones.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the information includes an identification of whether a connection was permitted or denied between the first zone and the second zone of at least one pair, based on the propagation.
12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the information includes an identification of whether an expected security policy of the at least one pair of zones was violated, based on the propagation.
13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the information includes a path corresponding to the propagation of at least one of the one or more messages between the source and destination zones, based on the propagation.
14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the information includes a first report that identifies the security policy for a plurality of the one or more pairs, based on the propagation.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the information includes a second report that identifies each of the one or more pairs in which communication was denied between the first zone and the second zone, based on the propagation.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the information includes a third report that identifies each of the one or more pairs in which communication was permitted between the first zone and the second zone, based on the propagation.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the information includes a fourth report that identifies each of the one or more pairs in which an expected security policy was violated, based on the propagation.
18. The method of claim 10 , wherein the information includes a report that identifies each of the one or more pairs in which an expected security policy was violated, based on the propagation.