IP Library Granted Patent US 7,890,440
Granted Patent B1
US 7,890,440 · App. 11/511,764 · Granted Feb 15, 2011

Systems and methods for evaluating a group detection tool

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,890,440
App. No.
11/511,764
Granted
Feb 15, 2011
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods for evaluating a group detection tool are described. One described method includes a set of data including a collection of asserted links between pairs of individuals, creating a sorted list of the individuals present in the collection of asserted links, and creating a square co-occurrence matrix describing the collection of asserted links, the square co-occurrence matrix including a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns each containing the sorted list of individuals. The method also includes inserting a link indicator in each cell of the square co-occurrence matrix, the link indicator having a first value if a first individual associated with the row and a second individual associated with the column are linked and a second value if they are not, identifying a plurality of square sub-co-occurrence matrices in the square co-occurrence matrix, generating a statistic for a characteristic of at least one class of the plurality of square sub-co-occurrence matrices, and identifying one of the plurality of sub-co-occurrence matrices for each of the at least one class of square sub-co-occurrence matrices. The method further includes evaluating the performance of the group detection tool by: applying the group detection tool to the set of data, and determining the extent to which a plurality of individuals in the at least one square sub-co-occurrence matrix are associated in one or more groups generated by the group detection tool.

Claims (56)

1. A method of evaluating a group detection tool without knowledge regarding a composition of real-world groups to which individuals in an observed population belong, comprising:

receiving, using a microprocessor, a set of data comprising a collection of asserted links between pairs of individuals;

creating, using the microprocessor, a list of the individuals present in the collection of asserted links, each individual on the list being assigned a unique numerical identifier;

creating, using the microprocessor, a square co-occurrence matrix describing the collection of asserted links, the square co-occurrence matrix comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns each containing the list of individuals;

inserting, using the microprocessor, a link indicator in each cell of the square co-occurrence matrix, the link indicator having a first value if a first individual associated with the row and a second individual associated with the column are linked and a second value if they are not;

identifying, using the microprocessor, a plurality of square sub-co-occurrence matrices in the square co-occurrence matrix;

generating, using the microprocessor, a statistic for a characteristic of at least one class of the plurality of square sub-co-occurrence matrices;

identifying, using the microprocessor, one of the plurality of sub-co-occurrence matrices for each of the at least one class of square sub-co-occurrence matrices; and

evaluating, using the microprocessor, the performance of the group detection tool by:

applying the group detection tool to the set of data, and

determining the extent to which a plurality of individuals in the at least one square sub-co-occurrence matrix are associated in one or more groups generated by the group detection tool.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a link between a pair of individuals, the link implying both the ability and likelihood of exchange of information between the pair of individuals.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the class of sub-co-occurrence matrices comprises square a plurality of sub-co-occurrence matrices of size N×N for at least one value of N greater than 3.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the statistic for each of the at least one class of sub-co-occurrence matrices is the sum of link indicators having the first value in each of the columns of the sub-co-occurrence matrices in the class.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising determining that a pair of individuals is associated if the sum of the link indicators having the first value exceeds a threshold value.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the threshold value comprises a first threshold value and further comprising determining the first threshold value having a probability of occurrence less than a second threshold value.

7. The method of claim 5 , further comprising determining the threshold value by:

determining a first sum of link indicators in sub-co-occurrence matrices having fewer elements than in the sub-co-occurrence matrix;

determining a second sum of link indicators in sub-co-occurrence matrices having more elements than in the sub-co-occurrence matrix; and

setting the threshold value between the first sum and the second sum.

8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising creating a candidate cluster set comprising all pairs of individuals for which the sum of the link indicators having the first value exceeds the threshold value.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising adjusting the candidate cluster set.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein adjusting the candidate cluster set comprises removing any clusters comprising 3 or fewer members from the candidate cluster set.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein adjusting the candidate cluster set comprises removing aggregate clusters from the candidate cluster set.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one class comprises a plurality of classes of the same size.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the statistic comprises the sum of link indicators having the second value in each of the columns of the sub-co-occurrence matrices in the class.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising creating of a candidate cluster set comprising all pairs of individuals for which the sum of the link indicators having the second value is below a threshold value.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the threshold value is 0.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first value comprises a “1” and the second value comprises a “0.”

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the link indicator comprises the first value if the first individual and the second individual are the same.

18. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium with an executable program stored thereon, wherein the program instructs a microprocessor to perform the following steps for evaluating a group detection tool without knowledge regarding a composition of real-world groups to which individuals in an observed population belong:

receiving a set of data comprising a collection of asserted links between pairs of individuals;

creating a list of the individuals present in the collection of asserted links, each individual on the list being assigned a unique numerical identifier

creating a square co-occurrence matrix describing the collection of asserted links, the square co-occurrence matrix comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns each containing the list of individuals;

inserting a link indicator in each cell of the square co-occurrence matrix, the link indicator having a first value if a first individual associated with the row and a second individual associated with the column are linked and a second value if they are not;

identifying a plurality of square sub-co-occurrence matrices in the square co-occurrence matrix;

generating a statistic for a characteristic of at least one class of the plurality of square sub-co-occurrence matrices;

identifying one of the plurality of sub-co-occurrence matrices for each of the at least one class of square sub-co-occurrence matrices; and

evaluating the performance of the group detection tool by:

applying the group detection tool to the set of data, and

determining the extent to which a plurality of individuals in the at least one square sub-co-occurrence matrix are associated in one or more groups generated by the group detection tool.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18 , further comprising program code for determining a link between a pair of individuals, the link implying both the ability and likelihood of exchange of information between the pair of individuals.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the class of sub-co-occurrence matrices comprises square a plurality of sub-co-occurrence matrices of size N×N for at least one value of N greater than 3.

21. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 20 , wherein the statistic for each of the at least one class of sub-co-occurrence matrices is the sum of link indicators having the first value in each of the columns of the sub-co-occurrence matrices in the class.

22. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 21 , further comprising program code for determining that a pair of individuals is associated if the sum of the link indicators having the first value exceeds a threshold value.

23. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 22 , further comprising program code for determining the threshold value by:

determining a first sum of link indicators in sub-co-occurrence matrices having fewer elements than in the sub-co-occurrence matrix;

determining a second sum of link indicators in sub-co-occurrence matrices having more elements than in the sub-co-occurrence matrix; and

setting the threshold value between the first sum and the second sum.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 22 , further comprising program code for creating a candidate cluster set comprising all pairs of individuals for which the sum of the link indicators having the first value exceeds the threshold value.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 24 , further comprising program code for adjusting the candidate cluster set.

26. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 24 , wherein program code for adjusting the candidate cluster set comprises program code for removing any clusters comprising 3 or fewer members from the candidate cluster set.

27. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 25 , wherein program code for adjusting the candidate cluster set comprises program code for removing aggregate clusters from the candidate cluster set.

28. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the at least one class comprises a plurality of classes of the same size.

29. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 28 , wherein the statistic comprises the sum of link indicators having the second value in each of the columns of the sub-co-occurrence matrices in the class.

30. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 29 , further comprising program code for creating a candidate cluster set comprising all pairs of individuals for which the sum of the link indicators having the second value is below a threshold value.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2020
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: LEIDOS, INC.
Reel/Frame 051632/0742 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2020
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: LEIDOS, INC.
Reel/Frame 051632/0819 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2016
From: LEIDOS, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 039809/0801 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2016
From: LEIDOS, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 039818/0272 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 16, 2014
From: SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
To: LEIDOS, INC.
Reel/Frame 032694/0663 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Nov 20, 2009
From: SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
To: AFRL/RIJ
Reel/Frame 023550/0571 →