Security vulnerability determination in a computer system
View Patent ↗Security level of a computing system may be computed based on determining various security factor values for different operational aspects of the processing components. These security factor values are scaled to representative values or other types of identifiers. These security factor values may then be mapped on a security expectation scale, including taking into account the corresponding operational aspects. From this security factor value mapping, a computing system security determination can be calculated, which provides a vulnerability determination for the computing system providing information not only to the individual components, but also to the system as a whole.
1. A method for determining a security level of a computing system, the method comprising:
determining a plurality of security factor values for each of a plurality of processing components associated with the computing system by examining operational aspects of the processing components;
mapping each of the plurality of security factor values on a security expectation scale; and
generating a system vulnerability report based on the security factor value mapping from the security expectation scale.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the computing system operates in at least one of: an enterprise resource planning operating system and a customer relationship management system.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the processing components include at least one of: a network layer, an interface layer and a database layer.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining the plurality security factor values using an as is analysis of the computing system.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
generating a dashboard display for the computing system based on the computing system security determination.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
generating a benchmarking outline for at least one of: computing system development and computing system improvement based on the system vulnerability report.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the operational aspects include: availability, authorization, access control, auditability, integrity and confidentiality.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the security expectation scale ranges in representation values ranging from inefficient to supreme efficiency.
9. An apparatus for determining a security level of a computing system, the apparatus comprising:
a memory device having executable instructions stored therein; and
a processing device coupled to receive the executable instructions from the memory such that the processing device, in response to the executable instructions, is operative to:
determine a plurality of security factor values for each of a plurality of processing components associated with the computing system by examining operational aspects of the processing components;
map each of the plurality of security factor values on a security expectation scale; and
generate a system vulnerability report based on the security factor value mapping from the security expectation scale.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the computing system operates in at least one of: an enterprise resource planning operating system and a customer relationship management system.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the processing components include at least one of: a network layer, an interface layer and a database layer.
12. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the processing device, in response to the executable instructions, is further operative to:
determine the plurality security factor values using an as is analysis of the computing system.
13. The apparatus of claim 9 further comprising:
a dashboard display device coupled to the processing device, the processing device further operative to generate a dashboard display for the display device, wherein the dashboard display is based on the system vulnerability report.
14. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the processing device, in response to the executable instructions, is further operative to:
generate a benchmarking outline for at least one of: computing system development and computing system improvement based on the system vulnerability report.
15. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the operational aspects include:
availability, authorization, access control, auditability, integrity and confidentiality.
16. A computing system security determination device comprising:
the computing system including a plurality of computing layers and executing at least one of: an enterprise resource planning application and a customer relationship management system thereon;
a memory device having executable instructions stored therein; and
a processing device coupled to receive the executable instructions from the memory such that the processing device, in response to the executable instructions, is operative to:
determine a plurality of security factor values using an as is analysis for each of a plurality of processing components associated with the computing system by examining operational aspects of the processing components;
map each of the plurality of security factor values on a security expectation scale; and
generate a system vulnerability report based on the security factor value mapping from the security expectation scale.
17. The device of claim 16 wherein the processing components include at least one of: a network layer, an interface layer and a database layer.
18. The device of claim 16 further comprising:
a dashboard display device coupled to the processing device, the processing device further operative to generate a dashboard display for the display device, wherein the dashboard display is based on the system vulnerability report.
19. The device of claim 16 wherein the processing device, in response to the executable instructions, is further operative to:
generate a benchmarking outline for at least one of: computing system development and computing system improvement based on the system vulnerability report.
20. The device of claim 16 wherein the operational aspects include: availability, authorization, access control, auditability, integrity and confidentiality.
21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the processing components are of different types and perform different functions within the computing system.