IP Library Granted Patent US 7,546,177
Granted Patent B2
US 7,546,177 · App. 11/535,327 · Granted Jun 9, 2009

Automated state estimation system for cluster tools and a method of operating the same

Assignee: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,546,177
App. No.
11/535,327
Granted
Jun 9, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

By using weighted entity states for representing a state of a cluster tool, a highly efficient technique for the measurement and monitoring of cluster tool characteristics, such as reliability, availability and maintainability, is provided. For example, individual entities of the cluster tool may be weighted according to their capacity and corresponding entity states may be ranked in accordance with a predefined hierarchy structure, thereby enabling an efficient combination of weighted entity states so as to represent the cluster tool state.

Claims (18)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving process messages from a cluster tool used in a manufacturing process line via an interface communicating with said cluster tool, said cluster tool comprising a plurality of entities, wherein said process messages comprise tool-specific information specifying one of a plurality of available states for each of said entities;

automatically determining a metric for a current total state of said cluster tool on the basis of a functional capacity of each entity and said process messages, wherein said plurality of available states comprises a productive state, a standby state, an engineering state, a scheduled down state, an unscheduled down state and a non-scheduled state, and wherein said plurality of available states are ranked in a hierarchy, and wherein said hierarchy has a ranking of said plurality of available states in the following order from lowest to highest priority: a productive state, a standby state, an engineering state, a scheduled down state, an unscheduled down state and a non-scheduled state.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said metric of said current total state of the cluster tool is a set of values, each value being associated with a respective one of said available states and representing a weighted contribution of said respective one available state to said current total state.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring at least one of reliability, availability and maintainability on the basis of said metric of the current total state.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an updated metric for said total state for an operation time interval defined by a state change of at least one entity.

5. A method, comprising:

receiving process messages from a cluster tool used in a manufacturing process line via an interface communicating with said cluster tool, said cluster tool comprising a plurality of entities:

automatically determining a metric for a current total state of said cluster tool on the basis of a functional capacity of each entity and said process messages; and

defining a weighted capacity for each of said plurality of entities, wherein an entity having the lowest capacity is used as a reference.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein said weighted capacity for each entity is determined on the basis of a cycle time for a specified process in each entity and the number of substrates simultaneously processed in each entity.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising dynamically updating said cycle time on the basis of said process messages.

8. A method, comprising:

receiving process messages from a cluster tool used in a manufacturing process line via an interface communicating with said cluster tool, said cluster tool comprising a plurality of entities:

automatically determining a metric for a current total state of said cluster tool on the basis of a functional capacity of each entity and said process messages; and

defining a setup matrix for said cluster tool, said setup matrix comprising a row for each entity and columns for process steps and a weighted capacity for each of said plurality of entities, said process steps determining a process flow through said cluster tool.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising defining a hierarchy of said plurality of available states and using said hierarchy for determining said metric of said total state.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein said hierarchy has a ranking of said plurality of available states in the following order from lowest to highest priority: a productive state, a standby state, an engineering state, a scheduled down state, an unscheduled down state and a non-scheduled state.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2021
From: ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
To: FULLBRITE CAPITAL PARTNERS
Reel/Frame 055766/0694 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2019
From: ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
To: FULLBRITE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Reel/Frame 048844/0693 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2006
From: DIERKS, ULRICH; SCHUMACHER, HARDY
To: ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 018306/0553 →
Priority Claims (2)
DE 10 2005 063 132 · Dec 30, 2005 · national
DE 10 2006 001 257 · Jan 10, 2006 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070156274A1 · Jul 5, 2007