IP Library Granted Patent US 7,888,286
Granted Patent B2
US 7,888,286 · App. 11/537,858 · Granted Feb 15, 2011

Method of selectively controlling morning glory (Ipomoea) spp

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,888,286
App. No.
11/537,858
Granted
Feb 15, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of selectively controlling morning glory spp., by treating a lower portion of a hill of morning glory spp. with one compound or a combination of two or more compounds selected from glufosinate, L-glufosinate, bialaphos, paraquat, diquat and agriculturally acceptable salts of the compounds.

Claims (13)

1. A method of selectively controlling morning glory spp. comprising treating a lower portion of a hill rather than the entire hill of morning glory spp. with one or more herbicidal compounds selected from a group consisting of glufosinate, L-glufosinate, bialaphos, paraquat, diquat and agriculturally acceptable salts of the compounds.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the herbicidal compound is glufosinate or L-glufosinate or an agriculturally acceptable salt of glufosinate or of L-glufosinate.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the selective control is performed in a crop.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the crop is a soybean cultivation, fruit cultivation or cotton cultivation.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the herbicidal compound or herbicidal compound combination is applied at an application rate of 0.05 to 2.0 kg/ha.

6. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the herbicidal compound or herbicidal compound combination is applied by spraying devices which direct the spray drizzle to the portion of morning glory below the level of the leaves of the crop plants and between the crop plants.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the crop plant is soybean.

8. The method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the herbicidal compound or the herbicidal compound combination is applied at an application rate of 0.05 to 2.0 kg/ha.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the herbicidal compound is glufosinate or L-glufosinate or an agriculturally acceptable salt of glufosinate or L-glufosinate.

10. The method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the herbicidal compound is selected from the group consisting of paraquat, diquat and agriculturally acceptable salts thereof.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the herbicidal compound combination is paraquat dichloride and diquat dibromide.

12. The method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the herbicidal compound is selected from the group consisting of bialaphos and agriculturally acceptable salts thereof.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the herbicidal compound is bialaphos sodium.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2019
From: BAYER CROPSCIENCE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; BAYER CROPSCIENCE GMBH; BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH
To: BASF SE
Reel/Frame 049547/0192 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2015
From: BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG
To: BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH
Reel/Frame 034914/0354 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2007
From: SEO, SEOK WEON; TANIGUCHI, AKIRA
To: BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG
Reel/Frame 018986/0560 →