IP Library Granted Patent US 7,580,393
Granted Patent B2
US 7,580,393 · App. 11/541,815 · Granted Aug 25, 2009

Probe response determination

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,580,393
App. No.
11/541,815
Granted
Aug 25, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus and method of a method of an access point determining whether to transmit a response to a client device probe request is disclosed. The method includes the access point receiving a probe request from a client device. The access point determines a quality of a link between the access point and the client device based on the probe request. The access point sets a delay time for transmitting a probe response to the probe request depending upon the quality of the link.

Claims (28)

1. A method of an access point determining whether to transmit a response to a client device probe request, comprising:

the access point receiving a probe request from a client device;

the access point determining a quality of a link between the access point and the client device based on the probe request;

the access point setting a delay time for transmitting a probe response to the probe request depending upon the quality of the link;

the access point transmitting the response to the probe request, if the access point does receive a probe response to the client device from another access point within the delay time, and the quality of the link between the access point and the client device is better than a link quality between the other access point and the client device.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising including an indicator of the quality of the link between the access point and the client device within the probe response.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the indicator comprises a receive signal strength of the probe request from the client device.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the indicator further comprises a network quality parameter of the access point.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the indicator includes the received signal strength modified according to the network quality parameter.

6. A method of determining which of a plurality of access points has a highest quality link with a client device, comprising:

at least one of the plurality of access points receiving a probe request from the client device;

each access point that receives the probe request, estimating a link quality between the access point and the client device;

each access point that receives the probe request, delaying a probe response depending upon the link quality between the access point and the client device;

each access node transmitting the response to the probe request, if the access node does receive a probe response to the client device from another access node within the delay time, and the quality of the link between the access node and the client device is better than a link quality between the other access node and the client device.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the link quality is estimated by a received signal received signal strength at the access point.

8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising the link quality being influenced by a network quality parameter of the access point.

9. A method of an access node within a wireless mesh network determining whether to transmit a response to a client device probe request, comprising:

the access node receiving a probe request from a client device;

the access node determining a quality of a link between the access node and the client device based on the probe request;

the access point setting a delay time for transmitting a probe response to the probe request depending upon the quality of the link; wherein the probe response includes the quality of the link;

the access node transmitting the response to the probe request, if the access node does receive a probe response to the client device from another access node within the delay time, and the quality of the link between the access node and the client device is better than a link quality between the other access node and the client device.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining a quality of the link between the access node and the client device based on the probe request comprises measuring received signal strength of the probe request.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein determining a quality of the link between the access node and the client device further includes a network quality parameter of the access node.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the network quality parameter of the access node include at least one of a path quality of the access node to a wireless mesh network gateway, a latency of the access node, a backhaul bandwidth of the access node.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the network quality parameter comprises a quality of a routing path of the access node to a default gateway of the access node.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the quality of the routing path is determined by a persistence of routing beacons originating at the default gateway.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining a quality of the link between the access node and the client device based on the probe request comprises measuring received signal strength of the probe request.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein determining a quality of the link between the access node and the client device further includes a network quality parameter of the access node, wherein the network quality parameter of the access node include at least one of a path quality of the access node to a wireless mesh network gateway, a latency of the access node, a backhaul bandwidth of the access node.

Assignments (7)
MERGER Recorded Nov 13, 2023
From: HITACHI ENERGY SWITZERLAND AG
To: HITACHI ENERGY LTD
Reel/Frame 065549/0576 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 31, 2021
From: ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG
To: HITACHI ENERGY SWITZERLAND AG
Reel/Frame 058666/0540 →
MERGER Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: ABB TECHNOLOGY LTD.
To: ABB TECHNOLOGY AG
Reel/Frame 057685/0044 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2021
From: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
To: ABB POWER GRIDS SWITZERLAND AG
Reel/Frame 055589/0769 →
MERGER Recorded Dec 9, 2020
From: ABB TECHNOLOGY AG
To: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
Reel/Frame 054893/0273 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 8, 2020
From: TROPOS NETWORKS INC.
To: ABB TECHNOLOGY LTD.
Reel/Frame 054644/0511 →
RELEASE Recorded Jul 9, 2012
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: TROPOS NETWORKS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028755/0797 →