IP Library Granted Patent US 7,822,675
Granted Patent B1
US 7,822,675 · App. 11/552,510 · Granted Oct 26, 2010

Generation of cost or price quotations

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,822,675
App. No.
11/552,510
Granted
Oct 26, 2010
Kind
B1
Abstract

Provided are systems, methods and techniques for, among other things, generating a master price quotation. In one representative embodiment, a representative creates a list that includes at least one item to be included within a master price quotation and submits the list to an automated bidding agent. In response, the automated bidding agent communicates requests for quotations to different automated entity agents, each such automated entity agent corresponding to a different entity. The automated bidding agent then receives the quotations from the automated entity agents, selects a best quotation, and communicates the best quotation to the representative for inclusion within the master price quotation.

Claims (28)

1. A method for generating a master price quotation, comprising:

(a) a representative (i) creating a list comprising a plurality of items to be included within a master price quotation and (ii) submitting the list to an automated bidding agent;

(b) in response, the automated bidding agent by executing instructions on a processor-based system communicating requests for quotations to different automated entity agents for different groups of items on the list, each said automated entity agent corresponding to a different entity and each group comprising at least one of the items; and

(c) the automated bidding agent by executing instructions on the processor-based system receiving the quotations from the automated entity agents, selecting a best quotation for each group, and communicating the best quotations to the representative for inclusion within the master price quotation.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the automated bidding agent is configured so as to preclude the representative from accessing quotations that competed with the best quotation.

3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the automated entity agents is configured to respond to requests for quotations from the automated bidding agent automatically, without human interaction, based on a local pricing model.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the automated bidding agent includes a user interface for a user to specify which entities will receive requests for quotations for a particular item or a particular group of items.

5. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising a step of automatically tracking responsiveness to the requests for quotations of different entities.

6. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising receiving bids from different entities across a plurality of different projects and automatically maintaining and analyzing statistics regarding amounts set forth in the bids by the different entities.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the representative also designates at least one customer requirement pertaining to the at least one item as being potentially subject to change, and wherein the automated bidding agent includes said designation in the requests for quotations.

8. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising receiving bids by different entities, wherein the automated bidding agent includes an interface for the representative to specify adjustments of the bids.

9. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the automated bidding agent conducts an auction in which the automated entity agents have the ability to view each other's quotations and, in response, to submit revised quotations.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the list submitted by the representative includes requirements specified in a structured manner, in accordance with a previously published format.

11. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the list also includes unstructured requirements.

12. A method according to claim 11 , wherein all of the requirements are communicated to each automated entity agent that is requested to submit a quotation.

13. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the automated bidding agent automatically incorporates said best quotations into the master price quotation.

14. A method for generating a master price quotation, comprising:

(a) a deal architect (i) creating a list that includes a plurality of items to be included within a master price quotation and (ii) submitting the list to an automated bidding agent;

(b) in response, the automated bidding agent by executing instructions on a processor-based system dividing the list into groups of items, each group comprising at least one item, and communicating requests for quotations to different automated entity agents for different groups; and

(c) the automated bidding agent by executing instructions on the processor-based system receiving the quotations from the automated entity agents, selecting a best quotation for each different group, and communicating the best quotations to the deal architect for inclusion within the master price quotation.

15. A method according to claim 14 , wherein at least one of the automated entity agents is configured to respond to requests for quotation from the automated bidding agent automatically, without human interaction, based on a local pricing model, in specified circumstances.

16. A method according to claim 15 , wherein the automated bidding agent automatically incorporates said best quotations into the master price quotation.

17. A method according to claim 15 , wherein the at least one of the automated entity agents generates its quotation based on a pricing model that was specially modified for a particular project to which the master price quotation applies.

18. A computer-readable medium storing computer-executable process steps for generating a master price quotation, said process steps comprising:

(a) obtaining a list that includes a plurality of items to be included within a master price quotation;

(b) in response, dividing the list into different groups of items, each group comprising at least one item, and then, for the different groups, communicating requests for quotations to different entities; and

(c) receiving the quotations from the different entities, selecting a best quotation, and incorporating the best quotation into at least an initial draft of the master price quotation.

19. A computer-readable medium according to claim 18 , wherein the requests for quotations with respect to at least one of the different groups include requirements specified in a structured manner, in accordance with a previously published format, and also include unstructured requirements.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 044183/0718 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC (F/K/A ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC); BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.; SERENA SOFTWARE, INC; ATTACHMATE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC. (F/K/A NOVELL, INC.); NETIQ CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062746/0399 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 044183/0577 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC (F/K/A ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC)
Reel/Frame 063560/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 25, 2020
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC
Reel/Frame 052010/0029 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC; ARCSIGHT, LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 044183/0577 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: ATTACHMATE CORPORATION; BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; NETIQ CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE, INC.; ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC; ARCSIGHT, LLC; SERENA SOFTWARE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 044183/0718 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2017
From: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
To: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
Reel/Frame 042746/0130 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2015
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 037079/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 24, 2006
From: KUNO, HARUMI ANNE; SMATHERS, KEVIN LEE; SHAHOUMIAN, TROY
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 018434/0226 →