COMBINED ALGORITHMIC AND EDITORIAL-REVIEWED MOBILE CONTENT SEARCH RESULTS
In embodiments of the present invention improved capabilities are described for reviewing mobile content to determine relevance such that presenting the reviewed content to a mobile communication facility may be based at least in part on the relevance. The reviewed content may be subject to an algorithmic review, an editorial review, or a combined algorithmic-editorial review. The reviewed content may be blacklisted and prevented from being presented, whitelisted and permitted to be presented to the mobile communication facility, or given a relevance score based at least in part on appropriateness of content. Portions of the reviewed content may be removed or replaced with appropriate content prior to presentation to the user.
1 . A method comprising:
reviewing a mobile content, wherein the review is a combination of an algorithmic review and an editorial review to produce a reviewed mobile content;
determining a search query relevance based at least in part on information relating to the reviewed mobile content; and
presenting the reviewed mobile content on a mobile communication facility based at least in part on the relevance.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the editorial review includes categorization of content types.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the editorial review includes blacklisting the mobile content.
4 . (canceled)
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the editorial review includes whitelisting the mobile content.
6 . (canceled)
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the editorial review removes an unnecessary branch within the mobile content.
8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the unnecessary branch includes an errant link.
9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the editorial review includes checking the appropriateness of a mobile content.
10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the appropriateness is based at least in part on the presence of adult matter in the mobile content.
11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the appropriateness is based at least in part on the presence of a foreign language in the mobile content.
12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the appropriateness is based at least in part on a preference of a wireless carrier.
13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the editorial review includes increasing a keyword relevance based at least upon a criterion.
14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the criterion is a geographic location.
15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the criterion is a time.
16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the criterion is a keyword combination.
17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the algorithmic review includes a review of website content.
18 - 22 . (canceled)
23 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the algorithmic review includes a review of metadata associated with the mobile content.
24 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the mobile content is a website.
25 . (canceled)
26 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the relevance is a score.
27 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the review is a combination of an editorial review and an algorithmic review.
28 . A system comprising:
a review facility adapted to review a mobile content, wherein the review is a combination of an algorithmic review and an editorial review to produce a reviewed mobile content;
a determination facility adapted to determine a search query relevance based at least in part on information relating to the reviewed mobile content; and
a presentation facility adapted to present the reviewed mobile content on a mobile communication facility based at least in part on the relevance.
29 - 53 . (canceled)