IP Library Granted Patent US 7,463,098
Granted Patent B2
US 7,463,098 · App. 11/557,091 · Granted Dec 9, 2008

Feedback system incorporating slow digital switching for glitch-free state changes

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,463,098
App. No.
11/557,091
Granted
Dec 9, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A feedback system such as a phase locked loop (PLL) includes a second feedback loop which responds when a VCO control voltage is near either end of its range, by slowly adjusting additional tuning elements which control the VCO frequency. The second feedback loop is arranged to cause a slow enough change in the VCO frequency that the first traditional feedback loop adjusts the control voltage quickly enough in a direction toward its mid-range value to keep the VCO frequency substantially unchanged. The second feedback loop advantageously incorporates one or more digital control signals which preferably change no more than one bit at a time and with a controlled slow ramp rate. As a result, the PLL maintains phase accuracy so that the operation of the PLL, including subtle specifications such as input data jitter tolerance or output jitter generation when used for clock and data recovery applications, is not negatively impacted. An impedance tuning feedback system provides a resistance between two nodes which is proportional to a reference resistance, and preferably incorporates slow digital switching to result in near perturbation-free state changes over the tuning range of the resistance.

Claims (63)

1. An electronic feedback system comprising:

a first feedback loop for controlling a first operating parameter of the feedback system; and

a second feedback loop including a plurality of digital control signals to influence the feedback system in a manner which, absent the first feedback loop, would result in a change to the controlled first operating parameter when one or more of the digital control signals change value;

wherein the second feedback loop is configured to affect a larger controlled range of the controlled first operating parameter than the first feedback loop is configured to affect; and

wherein the second feedback loop is arranged to influence the feedback system slowly enough, relative to the first feedback loop, to allow the first feedback loop to maintain the controlled first operating parameter without significant perturbation.

2. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked loop; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises a phase or phase/frequency error of the phase locked loop.

3. The system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the first feedback ioop is responsive to a second operating parameter for controlling the first operating parameter; and

the second feedback ioop is also responsive to the second operating parameter.

4. The system as recited in claim 3 wherein:

the second operating parameter comprises a control node voltage.

5. The system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked loop having a controlled oscillator; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an operating frequency of the controlled oscillator.

6. The system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an effective impedance between two circuit nodes.

7. A method for controlling an electronic feedback system, said method comprising:

controlling a first operating parameter of the feedback system using a first feedback loop; and

controlling a plurality of digital control signals of a second feedback loop to influence the feedback system in a manner which, absent the first feedback loop, would result in a change to the controlled first operating parameter when one or more of the digital control signals change value, but said second feedback loop influencing the feedback system slowly enough relative to the first feedback loop, to allow the first feedback loop to maintain the controlled first operating parameter without significant perturbation;

wherein the second feedback loop is configured to affect a larger controlled range of the controlled first operating parameter than the first feedback loop is configured to affect.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked loop; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises a phase or phase/frequency error of the phase locked loop.

9. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein:

the first feedback loop is responsive to a second operating parameter for controlling the first operating parameter; and

the second feedback loop is also responsive to the second operating parameter.

10. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein:

the second operating parameter comprises a control node voltage.

11. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked loop having a controlled oscillator; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an operating frequency of the controlled oscillator.

12. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein:

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an effective impedance between two circuit nodes.

13. A method for making an electronic feedback system product, said method comprising:

forming a first feedback loop for controlling a first operating parameter of the feedback system;

forming a second feedback loop including a plurality of digital control signals to influence the feedback system in a manner which, absent the first feedback loop, would result in a change to the controlled first operating parameter when one or more of the digital control signals change value;

configuring the second feedback loop to affect a larger controlled range of the controlled first operating parameter than the first feedback loop is configured to affect; and

arranging the second feedback loop to influence the feedback system slowly enough, relative to the first feedback loop, to allow the first feedback loop to maintain the controlled first operating parameter without significant perturbation.

14. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked loop; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises a phase or phase/frequency error of the phase locked loop.

15. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein:

the first feedback loop is responsive to a second operating parameter for controlling the first operating parameter; and

the second feedback loop is also responsive to the second operating parameter.

16. The method as recited in claim 15 wherein:

the second operating parameter comprises a control node voltage.

17. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked ioop having a controlled oscillator; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an operating frequency of the controlled oscillator.

18. The method as recited in claim 13 wherein:

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an effective impedance between two circuit nodes.

19. An electronic feedback system comprising:

means for controlling a first operating parameter of the feedback system using a first feedback loop;

means for controlling a plurality of digital control signals of a second feedback loop to influence the feedback system in a manner which, absent the first feedback loop, would result in a change to the controlled first operating parameter when one or more of the digital control signals change value; and

means for influencing the feedback system slowly enough relative to the first feedback loop, upon one or more of the digital control signals of the second feedback loop changing value, to allow the first feedback loop to compensate for the influence of the second feedback loop upon the controlled first operating parameter and thus maintain the controlled first operating parameter without significant perturbation;

wherein the second feedback loop is configured to affect a larger controlled range of the controlled first operating parameter than the first feedback loop is configured to affect.

20. The system as recited in claim 19 wherein:

the electronic feedback system comprises a phase locked loop; and

the controlled first operating parameter comprises a phase or phase/frequency error of the phase locked loop.

21. The system as recited in claim 19 wherein:

the controlled first operating parameter comprises an effective impedance between two circuit nodes.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 054486/0422 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2020
From: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC; RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054198/0029 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2020
From: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC; RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054244/0566 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2018
From: RPX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 046486/0433 →
RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001) Recorded Jan 2, 2018
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
Reel/Frame 044970/0030 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 9, 2016
From: RPX CORPORATION; RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038041/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 23, 2014
From: SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 033373/0941 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2014
From: BAIRD, REX T.; HUANG, YUNTENG; PERROTT, MICHAEL H.
To: SILICON LABORATORIES INC.
Reel/Frame 033198/0365 →