IP Library Granted Patent US 7,996,910
Granted Patent B2
US 7,996,910 · App. 11/564,943 · Granted Aug 9, 2011

Techniques for detecting and preventing unintentional disclosures of sensitive data

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,996,910
App. No.
11/564,943
Granted
Aug 9, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Protection is provided to prevent a computer user from unintentionally giving away sensitive data (e.g., security credentials, credit card number, PINs, personal data, or bank account number) to an illegitimate or unintended entity by means of a client application capable of communicating the sensitive data across a network to other computer users. To provide the protection, user input is monitored to detect a user entry of the sensitive data into the client application for communication to other users. When such an entry occurs, action is taken to reduce the likelihood of an unintentional giveaway of the sensitive data or to reduce the effects of an unintentional giveaway.

Claims (55)

1. A computer-implemented method of protecting against an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data by a computer user to an illegitimate or unintended entity, the method comprising:

monitoring data being entered by a computer user into a client application, wherein the client application includes a web page with an input form, and the monitoring comprises:

determining whether a provider of a communication mechanism provided to the client application is an ISP;

determining whether the provider is globally trusted, wherein globally trusted providers include web domains that are external to an ISP network that are known to the ISP to have trusted web pages with input forms; and

determining whether the provider is personally trusted, wherein personally trusted providers include web domains that are known to a user of the client application to have trusted web pages with input forms;

accessing a set of pattern generating functions;

generating a set of string matching patterns by applying the set of pattern generating functions to sensitive data;

determining that the data being entered into the client application matches one or more of the string matching patterns in the set of string matching patterns; and

in response to determining that the data being entered into the client application matches one or more of the string matching patterns in the set of string matching patterns, performing one or more of the following actions: requesting that the computer user confirm a communication of the data; warning the computer user that communicating the data might result in an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data to an illegitimate or unintended entity; preventing the client application from communicating the data; or logging a communication of the data by the client application.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein monitoring data being entered into a client application includes using a list that comprises a first list of ISP client form ids, a second list of globally trusted web domains, and a third list of personally trusted web domains such that determining whether the provider is a trusted provider comprises:

using the first list to determine whether the provider is the ISP;

using the second list to determine whether the provider is the globally trusted web domain; and

using the third list to determine whether the provider is the personally trusted web domain.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising detecting that the web page is provided from a web domain that is not on a list of trusted web domains.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising detecting that the web page is provided from a web domain that is on a list of suspect web domains.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

passing the data entered into the client application to a matcher program or object; and

passing at least one of the string-matching patterns to the matcher program or object.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

selecting at least one matcher program or object; and

detecting an entry or partial entry of a variation of the sensitive data by:

passing data entered into the client application to the selected matcher program or object;

passing the sensitive data to the matcher program or object; and

comparing the data entered to a variation of the sensitive data encoded in the matcher program or object.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether a sequence of events preceding the entry of the data is known to be characteristic of an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data to an illegitimate or unintended entity.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether a sequence of events preceding the entry of the data is known to be characteristic of a submission of sensitive data to a legitimate or intended entity.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether an intended recipient of the data entered into the client application is known to be an illegitimate or unintended entity.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether an intended recipient of the data entered into the client application is known to be a legitimate or intended entity.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether a provider of a communication mechanism provided to the client application for communicating data is not a trusted provider.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the action comprises preventing the client application from communicating the data.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the action comprises warning the computer user that communicating the data might result in an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data to an illegitimate or unintended entity.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the action comprises logging a communication of the data by the client application.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the action comprises requesting that the computer user confirm a communication of the data.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the data comprises security credentials.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 wherein the security credentials comprise security credentials used to log onto an ISP's network.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 wherein the security credentials comprise security credentials used to log onto a website.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the data comprises a credit card number.

20. A non-transitory computer-usable medium storing a computer program for protecting against an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data by a computer user to an illegitimate or unintended entity, the computer program comprising instructions for causing a computer to:

monitor data being entered by a computer user into a client application, wherein the client application includes a web page with an input form, and the monitoring comprises:

determining whether a provider of a communication mechanism provided to the client application is an ISP;

determining whether the provider is globally trusted, wherein globally trusted providers include web domains that are external to an ISP network that are known to the ISP to have trusted web pages with input forms; and

determining whether the provider is personally trusted, wherein personally trusted providers include web domains that are known to a user of the client application to have trusted web pages with input forms;

access a set of pattern generating functions;

generate a set of string matching patterns by applying the set of pattern generating functions to sensitive data;

determine that the data being entered into the client application matches one or more of the string matching patterns in the set of string matching patterns;

in response to determining that the data being entered into the client application matches one or more of the string matching patterns in the set of string matching patterns, perform one or more of the following actions: requesting that the computer user confirm a communication of the data; warning the computer user that communicating the data might result in an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data to an illegitimate or unintended entity; preventing the client application from communicating the data; or logging a communication of the data by the client application.

21. A computer-implemented method of protecting against an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data by a computer user to an illegitimate or unintended entity, the method comprising:

monitoring, via a processor, data being entered by a computer user into a client application, wherein the client application includes a web page with an input form, and the monitoring comprises:

determining whether a provider of a communication mechanism provided to the client application is an ISP;

determining whether the provider is globally trusted, wherein globally trusted providers include web domains that are external to an ISP network that are known to the ISP to have trusted web pages with input forms; and

determining whether the provider is personally trusted, wherein personally trusted providers include web domains that are known to a user of the client application to have trusted web pages with input forms;

accessing, via the processor, a set of pattern generating functions;

generating, via the processor, a set of string matching patterns by applying the set of pattern generating functions to sensitive data;

determining, via the processor, that the data being entered into the client application matches one or more of the string matching patterns in the set of string matching patterns;

in response to determining that the data being entered into the client application matches one or more of the string matching patterns in the set of string matching patterns, performing one or more of the following actions: requesting that the computer user confirm a communication of the data; warning the computer user that communicating the data might result in an unintentional giveaway of sensitive data to an illegitimate or unintended entity; preventing the client application from communicating the data; or logging a communication of the data by the client application.

Assignments (8)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 2, 2017
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 044101/0405 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 7, 2014
From: BRIGHT SUN TECHNOLOGIES
To: GOOGLE INC.
Reel/Frame 033488/0331 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2014
From: MARATHON SOLUTIONS LLC
To: BRIGHT SUN TECHNOLOGIES
Reel/Frame 031900/0494 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 6, 2012
From: AOL INC.
To: MARATHON SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 028911/0969 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Nov 16, 2010
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N A
To: AOL INC; AOL ADVERTISING INC; GOING INC; LIGHTNINGCAST LLC; MAPQUEST, INC; NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; QUIGO TECHNOLOGIES LLC; SPHERE SOURCE, INC; TACODA LLC; TRUVEO, INC; YEDDA, INC
Reel/Frame 025323/0416 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 31, 2009
From: AOL LLC
To: AOL INC.
Reel/Frame 023720/0309 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 31, 2009
From: AMERICA ONLINE, INC.
To: AOL LLC
Reel/Frame 023720/0426 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 14, 2009
From: AOL INC.; AOL ADVERTISING INC.; BEBO, INC.; ICQ LLC; GOING, INC.; LIGHTNINGCAST LLC; MAPQUEST, INC.; NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; QUIGO TECHNOLOGIES LLC; SPHERE SOURCE, INC.; TACODA LLC; TRUVEO, INC.; YEDDA, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICAN, N.A. AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 023649/0061 →