IP Library Granted Patent US 7,450,057
Granted Patent B2
US 7,450,057 · App. 11/584,212 · Granted Nov 11, 2008

Signal processing for accelerating moving targets

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,450,057
App. No.
11/584,212
Granted
Nov 11, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for performing signal processing for accelerating moving targets, in one implementation, encompasses a method for performing coherent integration of pulses within a CPI for SMTI radar. In an embodiment, the method comprises the steps of determining the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for each pulse, and multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function. The method then proceeds by shifting phase of the pulse-compressed FFT by applying a first factor derived from a ground reference point and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide phase-shifted data, shifting the envelope of the phase-shifted data by applying one factor derived from range history and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide aligned data, and determining the Inverse FFT for the aligned data to provide a set of target data of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index, the latter three indices each referenced to the starting time of the first CPI. In a further embodiment, the invention encompasses first performing coherent integration for each CPI within a dwell of CPIs, then performing non-coherent integration in an efficient way, taking full advantage of the alignment to the starting time of the first CPI.

Claims (2539)

1. A method for processing pulses within a CPI for SMTI radar, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for each pulse;

(b) multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function;

(c) shifting phase of the pulse-compressed FFT by applying a first factor derived from a ground reference point and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide phase-shifted data;

(d) shifting envelope of the phase-shifted data by applying one factor derived from range history and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide aligned data; and

(e) determining Inverse FFT for the aligned data to provide a set of target data of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index.

2. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the SMTI radar has a characteristic transmitted chirp waveform, and the step (b) of multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function further comprises the steps of determining a transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform, determining a conjugate of the transfer function, and multiplying the FFT by the conjugate of the transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform.

3. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein pulse number is indexed by n, and wherein the step (c) of shifting phase of the pulse-compressed FFT by applying a first factor derived from a ground reference point and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide phase-shifted data further comprises the step of:

multiplying the n th pulse in the frequency domain, after multiplication by the pulse compression reference function, by

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

t

p

)

]

}

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

(

[

V

0

(

i

2

)

+

A

(

i

3

)

t

p

]

n

Δ

t

+

1

2

A

(

i

3

)

(

n

Δ

t

)

2

)

}

where:

R G (t) represents range history of a GRP;

V 0 (i 2 ) represents a velocity hypothesis; and

A(i 3 ) represents a range acceleration hypothesis.

4. The method in accordance with claim 3 , wherein the step (d) of shifting envelope of the phase-shifted data by applying one factor derived from range history and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide aligned data further comprises the step of:

multiplying the phase-shifted data by:

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

0

)

]

}

·

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

V

0

(

i

2

)

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

+

1

2

A

(

i

3

)

(

t

p

2

+

2

t

p

n

Δ

t

+

(

n

Δ

t

)

2

)

]

}

where:

s represents range sampling interval;

R G (t) represents range history of a GRP;

M represents number of samples;

k

^

=

{

k

,

k

=

0

,

,

M

/

2

-

1

k

-

M

,

k

=

M

/

2

,

M

-

1

}

;

V 0 (i 2 ) represents a velocity hypothesis;

A(i 3 ) represents a range acceleration hypothesis.

5. The method in accordance with claim 4 , further comprising the steps of:

selecting a set of velocity hypotheses given by

V

0

(

i

2

)

=

(

i

2

-

N

2

-

1

2

)

Δ

V

,

i

2

=

0

,

,

N

2

-

1

;

and

selecting a set of acceleration hypotheses given by

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1.

6. The method in accordance with claim 5 , further comprising the step of:

multiplying the pulse-compressed FFT by

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

t

p

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

·

n

Δ

t

]

}

.

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

0

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

]

}

where:

M represents number of samples; and

k

^

=

{

k

,

k

=

0

,

,

M

/

2

-

1

k

-

M

,

k

=

M

/

2

,

M

-

1

}

.

7. The method in accordance with claim 6 , further comprising the steps of:

determining

fact

(

n

,

k

)

=

2

π

[

1

λ

n

Δ

t

·

(

2

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

+

k

^

2

sM

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

2

]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1; and

determining

W

(

k

)

=

exp

[

j

2

πΔ

V

Δ

t

(

2

λ

+

k

^

sM

)

]

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and

FFT{W(k) −n 2 /2 }.

8. The method in accordance with claim 7 , further comprising the steps of:

for i 3 =0, . . . ,N 3 −1, performing the following operations:

(a) multiply the result of the multiplication of claim 6 by

exp [jA(i 3 )fact(n,k)]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1, yielding a result of the form F(k,n,i 3 );

(b) perform a transformation from the pulse index n to the velocity hypothesis index i 2 by a Chirp-Z Transform computation comprising:

G ( k,i 2 ,i 3 )=Σ n=0 N−1 F ( k,n,i 3 ) W ( k ) i 2 n

 for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

(c) multiply G(k,i 2 ,i 3 ) by

exp

(

j

2

πΔ

Vt

p

k

^

sM

i

2

)

 for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

(d) perform an IFFT with respect to k to yield an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ).

9. A method for processing pulses within a CPI for SMTI radar, wherein the SMTI radar has a characteristic transmitted chirp waveform, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for each pulse;

(b) multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function to provide a pulse-compressed FFT by:

determining a transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform;

determining a conjugate of the transfer function; and

multiplying the FFT by the conjugate of the transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform;

(c) selecting a set of velocity hypotheses given by

V

0

(

i

2

)

=

(

i

2

-

N

2

-

1

2

)

Δ

V

,

i

2

=

0

,

,

N

2

-

1

and selecting a set of acceleration hypotheses given by

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1

;

(d) multiplying the pulse-compressed FFT by

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

t

p

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

·

n

Δ

t

]

}

.

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

0

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

]

}

where:

M represents number of samples; and

k

^

=

{

k

,

k

=

0

,

,

M

/

2

-

1

k

-

M

,

k

=

M

/

2

,

M

-

1

}

;

(e) determining

fact

(

n

,

k

)

=

2

π

[

1

λ

n

Δ

t

·

(

2

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

+

k

^

2

sM

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

2

]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1;

(f) determining

W

(

k

)

=

exp

[

j

2

πΔ

V

Δ

t

(

2

λ

+

k

^

sM

)

]

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and

FFT{W(k) −n 2 /2 };

(g) for i 3 =0, . . . ,N 3 −1, performing the following operations:

(1) multiply the result of step (d) by

exp [jA(i 3 )fact(n,k)]

 for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1, yielding a result of the form F(k,n,i 3 );

(2) perform a transformation from the pulse index n to the velocity hypothesis index i 2 by a Chirp-Z Transform computation comprising:

G ( k,i 2 ,i 3 )=Σ n=0 N−1 F ( k,n,i 3 ) W ( k ) i 2 n

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0,. . . ,N 2 −1;

(3) multiply G(k,i 2 ,i 3 ) by

exp

(

j

2

πΔ

Vt

p

k

^

sM

i

2

)

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

(4) perform an IFFT with respect to k to yield an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index.

10. A method for processing radar data over a dwell of CPIs for SMTI radar, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) performing coherent integration for each CPI within the dwell to provide an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index;

(b) establishing an increment value ΔA′ between acceleration hypotheses such that

Δ

A

β

λ

T

C

T

D

 where:

β denotes a fraction of a velocity resolution cell that an actual velocity is allowed to migrate through due to acceleration mismatch;

T D denotes dwell time; and

T C denotes length of a CPI;

(c) introducing an increased number of acceleration hypotheses corresponding to

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1

 where:

i 3 ′ denotes an index associated with the increased number of acceleration hypotheses; and

N 3 ′ denotes total number of increased acceleration hypotheses;

(d) choosing an acceleration index according to the relation

i

~

3

=

N

3

-

1

2

+

round

[

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

Δ

A

]

;

(e) choosing a velocity hypothesis index according to the relation

i

~

2

=

i

2

+

round

{

[

A

(

i

3

)

-

A

(

i

~

3

)

]

t

p

Δ

V

}

;

(f) summing power over all CPIs in the dwell to complete the NCI process through the relation

Σ p=0 P−1 |H ( p,i 1 ,ĩ 2 ,ĩ 3 )| 2 ;

where:

P is the total number of CPIs in the dwell.

11. The method in accordance with claim 10 , further comprising reducing dimensionality of NCI output by computing a maximum with respect to the acceleration hypothesis according to the following relation:

max_power( i 1 ,i 2 )=max i 3 ′ Σ p=0 P−1 |H ( p,i 1 ,ĩ 2 ,ĩ 3 )| 2 .

12. The method in accordance with claim 10 , wherein the step (a) of performing coherent integration for each CPI within the dwell further comprises the steps of:

(a) determining Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for each pulse;

(b) multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function;

(c) shifting phase of the pulse-compressed FFT by applying a first factor derived from a ground reference point and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide phase-shifted data;

(d) shifting envelope of the phase-shifted data by applying one factor derived from range history and a second factor derived from a velocity-acceleration hypothesis to provide aligned data; and

(e) determining Inverse FFT for the aligned data to provide a set of target data of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index.

13. The method in accordance with claim 12 , wherein the SMTI radar has a characteristic transmitted chirp waveform, and the step (b) of multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function further comprises the steps of determining a transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform, determining a conjugate of the transfer function, and multiplying the FFT by the conjugate of the transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform.

14. The method in accordance with claim 12 , wherein performing coherent integration for each CPI within the dwell further comprises the steps of:

selecting a set of velocity hypotheses given by

V

0

(

i

2

)

=

(

i

2

-

N

2

-

1

2

)

Δ

V

,

i

2

=

0

,

,

N

2

-

1

;

and

selecting a set of acceleration hypotheses given by

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1.

15. The method in accordance with claim 12 , further comprising the step of:

multiplying the pulse-compressed FFT by

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

t

p

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

·

n

Δ

t

]

}

·

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

0

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

]

}

where:

M represents number of samples; and

k

^

=

{

k

,

k

=

0

,

,

M

/

2

-

1

k

-

M

,

k

=

M

/

2

,

M

-

1

}

.

16. The method in accordance with claim 15 , further comprising the steps of:

determining

fact

(

n

,

k

)

=

2

π

[

1

λ

n

Δ

t

·

(

2

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

+

k

^

2

sM

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

2

]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1; and

determining

W

(

k

)

=

exp

[

j2πΔ

V

Δ

t

(

2

λ

+

k

^

sM

)

]

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and

FFT{W(k) −n 2 /2 }.

17. The method in accordance with claim 16 , further comprising the steps of:

for i 3 =0, . . . ,N 3 −1, performing the following operations:

(a) multiply the result of the multiplication of claim 15 by

exp [jA(i 3 )fact(n,k)]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1, yielding a result of the form F(k,n,i 3 );

(b) perform a transformation from the pulse index n to the velocity hypothesis index i 2 by a Chirp-Z Transform computation comprising:

G ( k,i 2 ,i 3 )=Σ n=0 N−1 F ( k,n,i 3 ) W ( k ) i 2 n

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

(c) multiply G(k,i 2 ,i 3 ) by

exp

(

j2πΔ

Vt

p

k

^

sM

i

2

)

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

(d) perform an IFFT with respect to k to yield an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ).

18. An SMTI radar system for processing radar data over a dwell of CPIs comprising:

means for performing coherent integration for each CPI within the dwell to provide an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index;

means for establishing an increment value ΔA′ between acceleration hypotheses such that

Δ

A

β

λ

T

C

T

D

 where:

β denotes a fraction of a velocity resolution cell that an actual velocity is allowed to migrate through due to acceleration mismatch;

T D denotes dwell time; and

T C denotes length of a CPI;

means for introducing an increased number of acceleration hypotheses corresponding to

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1

 where:

i 3 ′ denotes an index associated with the increased number of acceleration hypotheses; and

N 3 ′ denotes total number of increased acceleration hypotheses;

means for choosing an acceleration index according to the relation

i

~

3

=

N

3

-

1

2

+

round

[

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

Δ

A

]

;

means for choosing a velocity hypothesis index according to the relation

i

~

2

=

i

2

+

round

{

[

A

(

i

3

)

-

A

(

i

~

3

)

]

t

p

Δ

V

}

;

means for summing power over all CPIs in the dwell to complete the NCI process through the relation

Σ p=0 P−1 |H ( p,i 1 ,ĩ 2 ,ĩ 3 )| 2 ;

where:

P is the total number of CPIs in the dwell.

19. The SMTI radar system of claim 18 , further comprising means for reducing dimensionality of NCI output by means for computing a maximum with respect to the acceleration hypothesis according to the following relation:

max_power( i 1 ,i 2 )=max i 3 ′ Σ p=0 P−1 |H ( p,i 1 ,ĩ 2 ,ĩ 3 )| 2 .

20. The SMTI radar system of claim 18 , wherein the means for performing coherent integration for each CPI within the dwell further comprises:

means for selecting a set of velocity hypotheses given by

V

0

(

i

2

)

=

(

i

2

-

N

2

-

1

2

)

Δ

V

,

i

2

=

0

,

,

N

2

-

1

;

and

means for selecting a set of acceleration hypotheses given by

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1.

21. The SMTI radar system of claim 20 , further comprising:

means for multiplying the pulse-compressed FFT by

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

t

p

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

·

n

Δ

t

]

}

·

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

0

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

]

}

where:

M represents number of samples; and

k

^

=

{

k

,

k

=

0

,

,

M

/

2

-

1

k

-

M

,

k

=

M

/

2

,

M

-

1

}

.

22. The SMTI radar system of claim 21 , further comprising:

means for determining

fact

(

n

,

k

)

=

2

π

[

1

λ

n

Δ

t

·

(

2

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

+

k

^

2

sM

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

2

]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1; and

means for determining

W

(

k

)

=

exp

[

j2πΔ

V

Δ

t

(

2

λ

+

k

^

sM

)

]

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and

FFT{W(k) −n 2 /2 }.

23. The SMTI radar system of claim 22 , further comprising:

for i 3 =0, . . . ,N 3 −1:

means for multiplying the result of the multiplication of claim 21 by

exp [jA(i 3 )fact(n,k)]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1, yielding a result of the form F(k,n,i 3 );

means for performing a transformation from the pulse index n to the velocity hypothesis index i 2 by a Chirp-Z Transform computation comprising:

G ( k,i 2 ,i 3 )=Σ n=0 N−1 F ( k,n,i 3 ) W ( k ) i 2 n

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

means for multiplying G(k,i 2 ,i 3 ) by

exp

(

j2πΔ

Vt

p

k

^

sM

i

2

)

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

means for performing an IFFT with respect to k to yield an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ).

24. A method for processing radar return pulse data over a dwell of CPIs for SMTI radar, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for each pulse;

(b) multiplying the FFT by a pulse compression reference function to provide a pulse-compressed FFT by:

determining a transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform;

determining a conjugate of the transfer function; and

multiplying the FFT by the conjugate of the transfer function of the transmitted chirp waveform;

(c) selecting a set of velocity hypotheses given by

V

0

(

i

2

)

=

(

i

2

-

N

2

-

1

2

)

Δ

V

,

i

2

=

0

,

,

N

2

-

1

and selecting a set of acceleration hypotheses given by

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1

;

(d) multiplying the pulse-compressed FFT by

exp

{

j

4

π

λ

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

t

p

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

·

n

Δ

t

]

}

·

exp

{

j

2

π

s

k

^

M

[

R

G

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

-

R

G

(

0

)

-

N

2

-

1

2

Δ

V

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

]

}

where:

M represents number of samples; and

k

^

=

{

k

,

k

=

0

,

,

M

/

2

-

1

k

-

M

,

k

=

M

/

2

,

M

-

1

}

;

(e) determining

fact

(

n

,

k

)

=

2

π

[

1

λ

n

Δ

t

·

(

2

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

+

k

^

2

sM

(

t

p

+

n

Δ

t

)

2

]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1;

(f) determining

W

(

k

)

=

exp

[

j2πΔ

V

Δ

t

(

2

λ

+

k

^

sM

)

]

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and

FFT{W(k) −n 2 /2 };

(g) for i 3 =0, . . . ,N 3 −1, performing the following operations:

(1) multiply the result of step (d) by

exp [jA(i 3 )fact(n,k)]

for n=0, . . . ,N−1, and k=0, . . . ,M−1, yielding a result of the form F(k,n,i 3 );

(2) perform a transformation from the pulse index n to the velocity hypothesis index i 2 by a Chirp-Z Transform computation comprising:

G ( k,i 2 ,i 3 )=Σ n=0 N−1 F ( k,n,i 3 ) W ( k ) i 2 n

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1;

(3) multiply G(k,i 2 ,i 3 ) by

exp

(

j2πΔ

Vt

p

k

^

sM

i

2

)

for k=0, . . . ,M−1, and i 2 =0, . . . ,N 2 −1; and

(4) perform an IFFT with respect to k to yield an output of the form H(p,i 1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ), where p is CPI number, i 1 is range index, i 2 is velocity index, and i 3 is coarse acceleration index;

(h) establishing an increment value ΔA′ between acceleration hypotheses such that

Δ

A

β

λ

T

C

T

D

 where:

β denotes a fraction of a velocity resolution cell that an actual velocity is allowed to migrate through due to acceleration mismatch;

T D denotes dwell time; and

T C denotes length of a CPI;

(i) introducing an increased number of acceleration hypotheses corresponding to

A

(

i

3

)

=

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

,

i

3

=

0

,

,

N

3

-

1

 where:

i 3 ′ denotes an index associated with the increased number of acceleration hypotheses; and

N 3 ′ denotes total number of increased acceleration hypotheses;

(j) choosing an acceleration index according to the relation

i

~

3

=

N

3

-

1

2

+

round

[

(

i

3

-

N

3

-

1

2

)

Δ

A

Δ

A

]

;

(e) choosing a velocity hypothesis index according to the relation

i

~

2

=

i

2

+

round

{

[

A

(

i

3

)

-

A

(

i

~

3

)

]

t

p

Δ

V

}

;

(k) summing power over all CPIs in the dwell to complete the NCI process through the relation

Σ p=0 P−1 |H ( p,i 1 ,ĩ 2 ,ĩ 3 )| 2 ;

where:

P is the total number of CPIs in the dwell.

25. The method in accordance with claim 24 , further comprising reducing dimensionality of NCI output by computing a maximum with respect to the acceleration hypothesis according to the following relation:

max_power( i 1 ,i 2 )=max i 3 ′ Σ p=0 P−1 |H ( p,i 1 ,ĩ 2 ,ĩ 3 )| 2 .

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2010
From: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP.
To: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 023915/0446 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2009
From: NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORTION
To: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS CORP.
Reel/Frame 023699/0551 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 20, 2006
From: CLARK, DAVID CHARLES
To: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSIONS SYSTEMS CORP.
Reel/Frame 018448/0393 →