IP Library Granted Patent US 8,914,885
Granted Patent B2
US 8,914,885 · App. 11/592,726 · Granted Dec 16, 2014

Methods and apparatus for delivering control messages during a malicious attack in one or more packet networks

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,914,885
App. No.
11/592,726
Granted
Dec 16, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus are provided for reliably delivering control messages to a central filter, for example, during a malicious attack, in one or more packet networks without requiring responses or acknowledgements from the central filter to the detector. A detector defends against unwanted traffic by a target victim by determining that unwanted traffic is received by the target victim based on an analysis of packets received from one or more source IP addresses; and transmitting a denunciation message to a central filter associated with a service provider, the denunciation message identifying a source address of at least one source computing device whose transmission of packets to the target victim is to be one or more of limited, dropped or allowed and wherein the denunciation message is transmitted using a Denunciation Protocol that does not require a prompt acknowledgement from the central filter. In addition, the denunciation messages can be sent redundantly to the central filter and are preferably self contained.

Claims (33)

1. A method for defending against unwanted traffic by a target victim, the target victim having one or more destination addresses, the method comprising the steps of:

determining that unwanted traffic is received by said target victim based on an analysis of packets received from one or more source IP addresses; and

transmitting a denunciation message to a central filter associated with a service provider, said denunciation message identifying a source address of at least one source computing device whose transmission of packets to said target victim are specified in said denunciation message to be one or more of limited, dropped and allowed and wherein said denunciation message is transmitted using a Denunciation Protocol that does not require a substantially immediate acknowledgement from said central filter, wherein said Denunciation Protocol comprises at least two communication channels, wherein said at least two communication channels comprise a first, substantially secure communication channel and a second communication channel in which the denunciation message is transmitted, wherein the second channel of the Denunciation Protocol does not require said substantially immediate acknowledgement from said central filter.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said denunciation message comprises one or more source/destination address pairs.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said unwanted traffic comprises a malicious attack or a Denial of Service attack.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said denunciation messages are sent redundantly to said central filter.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said denunciation message is self contained.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said Denunciation Protocol provides a coarse clock synchronization.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of receiving a shared state from said central filter and maintaining any changes to said state.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising the step of updating said shared state in response to a status request.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said Denunciation Protocol includes one or more features to avoid a malicious attack aimed at said Denunciation Protocol.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said denunciation message includes a sequence number.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein said sequence number allows conflicting denunciation messages from a plurality of said target victims to be reconciled.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein said sequence number allows a malicious attack aimed at said Denunciation Protocol to be avoided.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein said sequence number allows duplicate copies of said denunciation message to be discarded.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of authenticating with said central filter an identity of an originator of said denunciation message.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein said central filter authenticates said denunciation message and associates a zone with said denunciation message based on an identity of an originator of said denunciation message.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein said authentication employs a cryptographic hash based on a content of said denunciation message and a time counter.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein said second communication channel comprises a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) channel.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first communication channel comprises a Transport Layer Security (TLS) channel.

19. An apparatus for defending against unwanted traffic by a target victim, the target victim having one or more destination addresses, the apparatus comprising:

a memory; and

at least one processor, coupled to the memory, operative to:

determine that unwanted traffic is received by said target victim based on an analysis of packets received from one or more source IP addresses; and

transmit a denunciation message to a central filter associated with a service provider, said denunciation message identifying a source address of at least one source computing device whose transmission of packets to said target victim are specified in said denunciation message to be one or more of limited, dropped and allowed and wherein said denunciation message is transmitted using a Denunciation Protocol that does not require a substantially immediate prompt acknowledgement from said central filter, wherein said Denunciation Protocol comprises at least two communication channels,

wherein said at least two communication channels comprise a first, substantially secure communication channel and a second communication channel in which the denunciation message is transmitted, wherein the second channel of the Denunciation Protocol does not require said substantially immediate acknowledgement from said central filter.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein said denunciation messages are sent redundantly to said central filter.

21. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein said denunciation message is self contained.

22. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein said second communication channel comprises a User Datagram Protocol (UDP) channel.

23. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the first communication channel comprises a Transport Layer Security (TLS) channel.

24. An article of manufacture for defending against unwanted traffic by a target victim, the target victim having one or more destination addresses, comprising a non-transitory machine readable recording medium containing one or more programs which when executed implement the steps of:

determining that unwanted traffic is received by said target victim based on an analysis of packets received from one or more source IP addresses; and

transmitting a denunciation message to a central filter associated with a service provider, said denunciation message identifying a source address of at least one source computing device whose transmission of packets to said target victim are specified in said denunciation message to be one or more of limited, dropped and allowed and wherein said denunciation message is transmitted using a Denunciation Protocol that does not require a substantially immediate acknowledgement from said central filter, wherein said Denunciation Protocol comprises at least two communication channels, wherein said at least two communication channels comprise a first, substantially secure communication channel and a second communication channel in which the denunciation message is transmitted, wherein the second channel of the Denunciation Protocol does not require said substantially immediate acknowledgement from said central filter.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2020
From: ALCATEL LUCENT SAS
To: PIECE FUTURE PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 052033/0603 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2014
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 034357/0111 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 033949/0016 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2013
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 030510/0627 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 19, 2011
From: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 027085/0988 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2007
From: GREENWALD, MICHAEL B.; GROSSE, ERIC H.
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 018788/0366 →