IP Library Granted Patent US 8,868,442
Granted Patent B1
US 8,868,442 · App. 11/616,269 · Granted Oct 21, 2014

System for categorizing a seller relative to a vendor

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,868,442
App. No.
11/616,269
Granted
Oct 21, 2014
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods for competitive pricing are implemented in software for commerce in an electronic marketplace. A vendor may identify rivals: competitors against which the vendor most directly competes by dint of having similar reputation and market positioning. Using specified pricing models applied to filtered price data periodically gathered by spider-crawling competitors on the Internet, a vendor may adjust product prices to match rivals while accounting for overall marketplace price trends.

Claims (20)

1. A system that is adapted to categorize a seller relative to a vendor comprising:

a processor;

a memory;

an overall pricing model for a vendor being stored in the memory, wherein the overall pricing model comprises a position within an ordinal range of pricing levels, and wherein said overall pricing model relates to a composite representation of item pricing models for a set of on-sale items;

product-specific data for a first set of items being stored in the memory, wherein said first set comprises a plurality of items;

a first set of instructions being stored in the memory that, when executed, determines a product mix comprising a plurality of items from said first set of items and stores said product mix in the memory;

a second set of instructions stored in the memory that, when executed, read said product mix as a basis for search, whereby finding, via network connection, for a first set of sellers, current prices for a result set of items, wherein said first set of sellers comprises at least a first seller, wherein said first set of sellers does not include said vendor, as current prices for a plurality of on-sale items in said product mix by said vendor are available from a database without network search, and wherein said result set of items comprises a plurality of items in said product mix;

storing prices for said result set item prices;

a third set of instructions stored in the memory that, when executed,

(a) statistically characterize respective item price data by determining data representative of an item price curve for respective items in said result set of items,

(b) store said item price curve data in the memory,

(c) derive respective seller item pricing models for a plurality of items in said result set of items, wherein a said item pricing model comprises a position within a relative range of pricing levels for said plurality of items based upon said item price curve data;

determining an overall pricing model for said first seller using a plurality of said first seller item pricing models;

a fourth set of instructions stored in the memory that, when executed, categorize said first seller by at least in part comparing said first seller's overall pricing model to at least one threshold of similarity to said vendor's overall pricing model; and

storing said first seller categorization.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein a determination is made as to whether said first seller is a rival to said vendor based, at least in part, upon a plurality of factors calculated by computer and input by a computer user, wherein a rival comprises the highest threshold of similarity to said vendor.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the product mix is determined, at least in part, upon at least one statistical measure of a said item's financial significance to said vendor.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the product mix is determined using a predetermined item categorization.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the product mix comprises a representational cross-section of items offered on-sale by said vendor.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein a determination is made as to whether the first seller is a rival to said vendor using, at least in part, statistical analysis or input received from at least one user interface device.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 23, 2014
From: CHINOOK LICENSING, LLC
To: SALMON LICENSING TX, LLC
Reel/Frame 032959/0279 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2014
From: FTE EXCHANGE LLC
To: CHINOOK LICENSING LLC
Reel/Frame 032218/0967 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2013
From: TIERRA INTELECTUAL BORINQUEN, INC.
To: FTE EXCHANGE, LLC
Reel/Frame 030722/0978 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2012
From: ODOM, GARY
To: FTE EXCHANGE, LLC
Reel/Frame 029535/0270 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2012
From: FTE EXCHANGE, LLC
To: TIERRA INTELECTUAL BORINQUEN, INC.
Reel/Frame 029535/0469 →