IP Library Granted Patent US 8,139,541
Granted Patent B2
US 8,139,541 · App. 11/639,938 · Granted Mar 20, 2012

Method and system for bypassing media gateways in wireless networks

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,139,541
App. No.
11/639,938
Granted
Mar 20, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A call processing method and system in which the use of the MGW between the RNC and the peer party is limited to only certain situations. This invention uses RFC 3267 (AMR/IETF) on the RNC. This will avoid inserting a MGW context for framing conversion only. This invention provides an optimization that sets up calls from the RNC, thus avoiding the need for a MGW in the path for basic calls. With this optimization, the usage of DSP and packet resources and the number of MGW chassis, as well as bearer path delay, are all reduced.

Claims (44)

1. A method of processing calls in a wireless telecommunications network, the method comprising:

receiving a call from a calling party to a called party at a Mobile Switching Center (MSC);

determining whether a Media Gateway (MGW) is necessary at the MSC to begin to process the call;

setting up a call bearer path between the calling party and the called party via a Radio Network Controller (RNC) controlled by the MSC and via an MGW at the MSC only if necessary to process the call, wherein the framing on a path between the RNC and the MGW is selected to be the same as the framing on a path from the MGW towards the remainder of the network;

after the call has been set up, receiving a call event at the MSC while the call is in process, wherein the call event triggers a change in the current state of the call;

determining whether an MGW at the MSC is necessary to process the call event; and

inserting or removing an MGW at the MSC during the call depending on the requirements of the call event.

2. The method defined in claim 1 , wherein the wireless telecommunications network comprises a Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS).

3. The method defined in claim 1 , wherein the call event comprises call answer, a tone, an announcement, call conferencing, resuming to a 2-party call, wire tapping, handover to another RNC or to a GSM system, call forwarding, or multi-party conferencing.

4. A method of processing calls in a wireless telecommunications network whereby a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) does not

allocate a Media Gateway (MGW) resource at the beginning of a call, the method comprising:

performing initial bearer negotiation with media capability information but without media connection information until media capability negotiation is complete; and

determining that no condition exists requiring the inclusion of an MGW resource;

and further comprising: determining that no condition exists by identifying that no transcoding is required and a single framing protocol may be used, and that the originating MSC does not need to provide a service requiring an MGW, including providing generation of call progress tone, conference circuits, or CALEA, or the terminating MSC does not need to provide a service requiring an MGW, including providing generation of call progress tone.

5. The method defined in claim 4 , further comprising including media connection information in subsequent bearer negotiation messages that does not reference any MGW resource.

6. The method defined in claim 4 , wherein the originating MSC is the local MSC associated with the calling subscriber.

7. The method defined in claim 4 , wherein the terminating MSC is the local MSC associated with the called subscriber.

8. The method defined in claim 4 , wherein initial bearer negotiation is performed though the exchange of SDP information contained in SIP INVITE, PRACK, 18X or 200 OK signaling messages.

9. The method defined in claim 4 , wherein media capability information comprises the codec information and associated parameters.

10. The method defined in claim 4 , wherein media connection information comprises IP address and port.

11. The method defined in claim 4 , wherein subsequent bearer negotiation is performed through the exchange of SDP information in (re)INVITE, UPDATE, PRACK, 200 OK SIP signaling messages.

12. A system for processing calls in a wireless telecommunications network, the system comprising at least one server operative to:

receive a call from a calling party to a called party at a Mobile Switching Center (MSC);

determine whether a Media Gateway (MGW) is necessary at the MSC to begin to process the call;

set up a call bearer path between the calling party and the called party via a Radio Network Controller (RNC) controlled by the MSC and via an MGW at the MSC only if necessary to process the call;

after the call has been set up, receive a call event at the MSC while the call is in process, wherein the call event triggers a change in the current state of the call;

determine whether an MGW at the MSC is necessary to process the call event; and

insert or remove an MGW at he MSC during the call depending on the requirements of the call event.

13. The system defined in claim 12 , wherein the wireless telecommunications network comprises a Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS).

14. The system defined in claim 12 , wherein the call event comprises call answer, a tone, an announcement, call conferencing, resuming to a 2-party call, wire tapping, handover to another RNC or to a GSM system, call forwarding, or multi-party conferencing.

15. A system for processing calls in a wireless telecommunications network whereby a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) does not allocate a Media Gateway (MGW) resource at the beginning of a call, the system comprising at least one server operative to:

perform initial bearer negotiation with media capability information but without media connection information until media capability negotiation is complete;

determine that no condition exists requiring the inclusion of an MGW resource, wherein the at least one server is further operative to:

determine that no condition exists by identifying that no transcoding is required and a single framing protocol may be used, and that the originating MSC does not need to provide a service requiring an MGW, including providing generation of call progress tone, conference circuits, or CALEA, or the terminating MSC does not need to provide a service requiring a MGW, including providing generation of call progress tone.

16. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein the at least one server is further operative to:

include media connection information in subsequent bearer negotiation messages that does not reference any MGW resource.

17. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein the originating MSC is the local MSC associated with the calling subscriber.

18. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein the MSC comprises a terminating MSC that is the local MSC associated with the called subscriber.

19. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein the at least one server is further operative to:

perform initial bearer negotiation through the exchange of SDP information contained in SIP INVITE, PRACK, 18X or 200 OK signaling messages.

20. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein media capability information comprises the codec information and associated parameters.

21. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein media connection information comprises IP address and port.

22. The system defined in claim 15 , wherein the at least one server is further operative to:

perform subsequent bearer negotiation through the exchange of SDP information in (re)INVITE, UPDATE, PRACK, 200 OK SIP signaling messages.

Assignments (13)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2023
From: RPX CORPORATION
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063429/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 28, 2021
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: RPX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 059352/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 058363/0723 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKETS SERVICES LLC
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 058983/0104 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 14, 2019
From: NOKIA USA INC.
To: NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC.
Reel/Frame 048370/0682 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
To: NOKIA USA INC.
Reel/Frame 043879/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY; NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS BV; ALCATEL LUCENT SAS
To: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 043877/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2017
From: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC; PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP, LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 043967/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 033868/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 30, 2013
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 029821/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2012
From: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 027565/0205 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 11, 2012
From: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.
Reel/Frame 027513/0876 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2006
From: EJZAK, RICHARD P.; CALME, JAMES A.; GAFRICK, JOHN M.
To: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 018717/0666 →